Jean Brown Research Clinical Research
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States
NCT Number: NCT03879408
Study assessing efficacy and safety of concomitantly dosed naproxen sodium with acetaminophen, compared with naproxen sodium, hydrocodone/acetaminophen and Placebo in a postoperative dental pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me17 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107, United States
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of concomitantly administered naproxen sodium 440 mg with acetaminophen 1000 mg and concomitantly administered naproxen sodium 220 mg with acetaminophen 650 mg, compared with a fixed combination of hydrocodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 650 mg, naproxen sodium 440 mg, and placebo over a twelve-hour period after surgical extraction of four third molars.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
440 mg naproxen sodium with 1000 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of two naproxen sodium 220 mg tablets and two acetaminophen 500 mg tablets
Other names: Naproxen Sodium with Acetaminophen - High Dose
220 mg naproxen sodium with 650 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of one naproxen sodium 220 mg tablet and two acetaminophen 325 mg tablets and one placebo tablet
Other names: Naproxen Sodium with Acetaminophen - Low Dose
10 mg hydrocodone with 650 mg acetaminophen administered as a single dose of two hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg tablets and two placebo tablets
Other names: Commercial Hydrocodone + Acetaminophen Tablet
440 mg naproxen sodium administered as a single dose of two naproxen sodium 220 mg tablets and two placebo tablets
Other names: Naproxen sodium
Single dose of four placebo tablets
Time frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 6 hours post-dose
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) score was measured using a Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). The possible range of SPID for 0-6 hours was from -60 to 60. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. PID was the difference between baseline pain intensity and pain intensity at assessment. Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point and adding these time-weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0 to 6 hours.
Time frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference score was measured using a PI-NRS ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). The possible range of SPID for 0-12 hours was from -120 to 120. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. PID was the difference between baseline pain intensity and pain intensity at assessment (12 hours). Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point and adding these time-weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0 to 12 hours.
Time frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 6 hours post-dose
Time-weighted total pain relief (TOTPAR) was measured using a Pain Relief Numerical Rating Scale (PR-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no relief, 10 = complete relief). Total pain relief scores (TOTPARs) were calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each postdose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The minimum value was 0, and the maximum value was 60. Higher scores was indicative of more pain relief.
Time frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 8 hours post-dose
TOTPAR was measured using a PR-NRS ranging from 0-10 (0 = no relief, 10 = complete relief). Total pain relief scores (TOTPARs) were calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each postdose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The minimum value was 0, and the maximum value was 80. Higher scores was indicative of more pain relief.
Time frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
TOTPAR was measured using a PR-NRS ranging from 0-10 (0 = no relief, 10 = complete relief). Total pain relief scores (TOTPARs) were calculated by multiplying the pain relief score at each postdose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values. The minimum value was 0, and the maximum value was 120. Higher scores was indicative of more pain relief.
Time frame: Baseline (0 hour) up to 8 hours post-dose
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference score was measured using a PI-NRS ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). The possible range of SPID for 0-8 hours was from -80 to 80. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. PID was the difference between baseline pain intensity and pain intensity at assessment (8 hours). Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point and adding these time-weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0 to 8 hours.
Time frame: 0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 0.75 hours, 1 hours, 1.25 hours, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, 10 hours, 11 hours, and 12 hours
Participants answered a question at individual time points: "how much relief do you have from your starting pain?" on a 11-point PR-NRS. Scale ranged from 0=no relief to 10=complete relief. Higher score indicated improvement in pain.
Time frame: 0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 0.75 hours, 1 hours, 1.25 hours, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, 10 hours, 11 hours, and 12 hours
Pain Intensity was self-reported over 12 hours, using a pain rating of 0-10 on the PI-NRS, with score ranged from 0-10 (0= no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). Pain intensity differences were calculated with respect to baseline at each time point after study drug administration.
Time frame: Up to 12 hours
Participants were asked to rate their overall impression of the study medication using the following scale: poor (0), fair (1), good (2), very good (3), and excellent (4) where higher score represented better outcome.
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division
Industry
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo And Active Controlled, Study To Evaluate Two Strengths Of Concomitantly Dosed Naproxen Sodium With Acetaminophen, Compared With Naproxen Sodium and Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen In Postoperative Dental Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07279285
Facial Pain, Injection Pain
Amman, Jordan
View Trial DetailsNCT05761574
Facial Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04447040
Facial Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04682080
Anesthesia, Anxiety
Tokat Province, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details