Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04682080

Pain Perception With a Comfort-ın Jet Injection and Conventional Dental Injection

The investigators aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Comfort-in system, which is a jet injection type, and infiltrative anesthesia with a traditional injector, and to measure the effect of children's anxiety on the severity of pain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

4 year–10 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Dentistry

Tokat Province, Center, 60250, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Among the children between the ages of 4 and 10 who were admitted to clinic between 2018-2020, whose clinical and radiographic examinations were completed; Patients with deciduous teeth that needed the same dental treatment (filling or amputation) with symmetrical local anesthesia application and positive (3) or definitely positive (4) according to the Frankl Behavior Evaluation Scale were included in the study. In study with a split-mouth design, infiltration anesthesia was applied with a conventional dental injector to one of the symmetrical teeth requiring the same treatment, while the Comfort-in jet injection system was applied to the other by the same physician. Patients were randomized into two grups according to the injection technique.

Group1: Needle-free injection system(Comofrt-In) 2:Dental injection method. The pain intensity was assessed during anesthesia(Pain 1), during treatment(Pain 2), at the end of the treatment(Pain 3) and on the postoperative 1st day (Pain 4)by the specially 7 colors (white, yellow, green, blue, magenta, red, black) using the Wong-Baker facial expressions and pain grading scale.Anxiety levels were recorded using the Modified Children's Dental Anxiety Scale face version.

The data were analyzed by IBM SPSS Statistics 19, the significance level was taken as p <0.05.The datas were analyzed with a three-way variance method in repeated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 4-10 years
  • Having no developmental or systemic disorder or no history of allergy
  • Having "positive" or "definitely positive" cooperation level according to the Frankl Behavior Scale
  • Having sufficient mouth opening
  • Operation only on primary teeth
  • Having decayed teeth that require anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients younger than four years, older than 10 years,
  • Patients with systemic or developmental disorders
  • Children with an allergy history
  • 'Negative' or 'definitly negative' behavior rating according to the Frankl scale
  • Patients whose mouth opening is not sufficient for dental treatment
  • Operating only on permanent teeth
  • Teeth that are beyond the treatment stage
  • When pain occurred during treatment, supplemental anesthetics administrated, and these children were excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Needle-free injection

Behavioral

This study was performed among children aged 4-10 years who required dental treatment and were treated at the Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziosmanpasa University. A total of 120 patients were evaluated in accordance with the exclusion criteria and 94 children (39 girls and 55 boys) were included in this study. Children who needed dental treatment were randomly divided into two groups. All dental injections were administered by the same operator (MB), a pediatric dentist with two years of experience in using the Comfort-In system.

In both groups, the children were asked to rate their pain intensity by choosing the closest statement on the colorful Wong-Baker Pain Scale at four time points: immediately after injection (Pain 1), during treatment (Pain 2), at the end of the treatment (Pain 3) and postoperative first day.Anxiety levels were recorded using the Modified Children's Dental Anxiety Scale face version

Other names: Dental injection

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain at different anesthesia methods

    Time frame: after dental treatments to 24 hour

    The pain perception scores in the two anesthesia methods were assessed with Wong-Baker Pain Scale (Wong-Baker Scale is pain assessment method.It consists of 6 facial expressions that are evaluated from 0 to 10 according to the severity of the pain. Values between 0-4 indicate mild pain, values between 4-6 indicate moderate pain, values between 6-8 indicate severe pain and values between 8-10 indicate unbearable pain).

  2. Anxiety level of children

    Time frame: after dental treatments(40 minutes)

    Anxiety level of children were assesed with Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale is anxiety assessment method. It consist of 8 questions about dental procedures. Each questions are evaluated 5 faces from smiles to cries according to the severity of tne anxiety. Patients with a Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale value below 26 have less anxiety, and patients with a value of 26 and above have a high level of anxiety.

  3. Color of pain during anesthesia.

    Time frame: immediately after injection(2 minutes),

    The pain perception scores in the two anesthesia methods were assessed with 7 colorful (white,yellow, green, blue, purple, red and black) Wong-Baker Pain Scale (Wong-Baker Scale is pain assessment method.It consists of 6 facial expressions that are evaluated from 0 to 10 according to the severity of the pain. Values between 0-4 indicate mild pain, values between 4-6 indicate moderate pain, values between 6-8 indicate severe pain and values between 8-10 indicate unbearable pain)

  4. Children's preferred anesthesia method

    Time frame: After using each dental injection method(2 weeks).

    Children's preferred anesthesia method was asked for children after two different injection tecniques used.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Evaluation of Pain Perception With a Comfort-in Jet Injection and Convantional Dental Injection in Children: a Randomized, Split-mouth, Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 23, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 23, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.