Tanta University Hospital
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, 31527, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07679217
Post-traumatic atrophic scars are characterized by skin depressions caused by loss of collagen and can lead to cosmetic and psychological concerns. Several treatment options have been proposed, including fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser resurfacing and autologous nanofat grafting, both of which may improve scar appearance through skin remodeling and regeneration. This prospective comparative study evaluates the safety and efficacy of fractional CO2 laser alone, autologous nanofat injection alone, and combination therapy in patients with post-traumatic atrophic scars. Sixty participants were assigned to one of three treatment groups and were assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale, physician global assessment, patient satisfaction, dermoscopic examination, and histopathological evaluation. The study aims to determine whether combining fractional CO2 laser and nanofat injection provides superior clinical and regenerative outcomes compared with either treatment alone while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, 31527, Egypt
Post-traumatic atrophic scars are characterized by dermal collagen loss, epidermal thinning, and alterations in skin texture and pigmentation. These scars may result in significant cosmetic disfigurement and negatively affect patients' quality of life. Despite the availability of multiple treatment modalities, no single intervention has consistently demonstrated optimal efficacy.
Fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser induces controlled microthermal injury that stimulates collagen remodeling and skin regeneration. Autologous nanofat grafting, which is rich in adipose-derived regenerative cells and growth factors, has emerged as a promising regenerative treatment for improving skin quality and scar remodeling. Combining these two modalities may provide synergistic effects by enhancing tissue regeneration and improving both structural and aesthetic outcomes.
This prospective comparative study was conducted to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of fractional CO2 laser monotherapy, autologous nanofat injection monotherapy, and combination therapy in the treatment of post-traumatic atrophic scars. Clinical efficacy was assessed using physician evaluation, Vancouver Scar Scale scores, and patient satisfaction, while dermoscopic and histopathological examinations were performed to investigate treatment-induced structural changes and the mechanisms underlying scar improvement.
The study aimed to determine whether combined therapy offers superior clinical and regenerative outcomes compared with either treatment alone while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A single session of intradermal injection of autologous nanofat prepared from centrifuged and mechanically emulsified adipose tissue for treatment of post-traumatic atrophic scars.
Other names: Autologous Nanofat
Fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser (10,600 nm) administered in three sessions at one-month intervals for treatment of post-traumatic atrophic scars.
Other names: Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after completion of treatment
The change in scar severity assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), including vascularity, pigmentation, and pliability, from baseline to the post-treatment assessment.
Time frame: 3 months after completion of treatment
Clinical improvement evaluated by three blinded dermatologists using a quartile grading scale (poor: 0-25%, fair: 25-50%, good: 50-75%, excellent: 75-100% improvement).
Tanta University
Other
Safety and Efficacy of Nanofat Injection and Fractional CO2 Laser: Monotherapy Versus Combined Therapy in Post-Traumatic Atrophic Scars
Acronym: NANOCO2-PTS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05461157
Cicatrix, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07673484
Allergic Contact Dermatitis, Cicatrix
Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03057964
Cicatrix, Fibrosis
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05408117
Cicatrix, Fibrosis
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details