Nintedanib
DrugNintedanib 150 mg BID
Other names: OFEV
NCT Number: NCT05799755
This research study will evaluate safety and how well the study drug, nintedanib improve symptoms in participants with myositis associated interstitial lung disease (MA-ILD). Interstitial lung disease is a disorder caused by the abnormal accumulation of cells structures between air sacs of the lungs resulting in thickening, stiffness and scarring of the tissues of the lung.
This study will enroll a total of 134 participants across 15 clinical sites located in the United States. A subset of participants will be enrolled remotely via telemedicine utilizing certified mobile home research nurses and various remote monitoring devices.
The research visits may include a physical exam, vital signs (such as blood pressure, heart rate, etc.), pulmonary function tests (PFT and/or home spirometry), Computerized Tomography (or CT) scans of the chest, blood draws, wearing a physical activity monitor and completing questionnaires. Some of these events may be done at home, at a local facility or remotely (via telemedicine).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Participants enrolled in the study will receive either study drug or placebo for 12 weeks plus the participant's normal standard of care medication for the participant's disease. Placebo is an inactive substance that contains no medicine. Following the initial treatment phase, participants will receive the active study drug (nintedanib) for an additional 12-week period.
Nintedanib is a drug that is currently used and has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and has been shown to slow the rate of decline in pulmonary function among patients with IPF as well as interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with systemic sclerosis or scleroderma. In addition, in March 2020, the FDA approved nintedanib oral capsules to treat patients with chronic fibrosing (scarring) interstitial lung diseases (ILD) with a progressive phenotype (trait).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Glucocorticoid (maximum dose ≤20 mg/day; prednisone equivalent). Mycophenolate mofetil (max dose 3 gm/day) Mycophenolic acid (max dose 2,160 mg/day) Azathioprine (max dose 2.5 mg/kg/day) Methotrexate (max dose 25 mg/week Tacrolimus (max dose 10 mg/day) Cyclosporine (max dose 200 mg/day) Leflunomide (max dose 20 mg/day) Sulfasalazine (max dose 3 gm/day) JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib max does 11 mg/day, upadacitinib max dose 15 mg/day, baricitinib max does 4 mg/day) IVIG (Intravenous immunoglobulin) or SQIG (subcutaneous immunoglobulin) (max dose 2 gm/kg/month) is allowed and not considered as SOC IS therapy Rituximab (maximum dose 1000 mg x 2 (2 weeks apart) or 375mg/m2 weekly dose x 4, repeated every > 4 months) Hydroxychloroquine is allowed and not considered as SOC IS therapy. Orencia (max dose of 125 mg SQ once a week or 1 gm monthly IV infusion)
Should remain stable throughout the study.
Exclusion criteria
Highly effective contraception examples are:
-
Nintedanib 150 mg BID
Other names: OFEV
Placebo comparator
Maximum of 2 standard of care immunosuppressant (IS) drugs are allowed, one being a glucocorticoid (GC) and the other being a non-GC IS drug OR 2 non-GC IS drugs in the event that the patient is not on a GC). The patient should be on the IS drug(s) for at least 12 weeks (at least 4 weeks or more for GC) before the screening. The doses should be stable for at least 4 weeks (at least 2 weeks for GC) before the screening visit.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire is a 44 item questionnaire with two modules: Symptoms (23 items) and Impacts (21 items).
The Symptoms module yields three domain scores: 1) dyspnea, 2) cough and 3) fatigue as well as a total Symptoms score. The Impacts module yields a single Impacts score. Symptoms and Impacts scores are summed to yield a total L-PF score. Scoring is performed as a summary score, the mean of the dimension ratings multiplied by 100. Summary score range from 0-100, the higher the score the greater the impairment.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire is a 44 item questionnaire with two modules: Symptoms (23 items) and Impacts (21 items).
The Symptoms module yields three domain scores: 1) dyspnea, 2) cough and 3) fatigue as well as a total Symptoms score. The Impacts module yields a single Impacts score. Symptoms and Impacts scores are summed to yield a total L-PF score. Scoring is performed as a summary score, the mean of the dimension ratings multiplied by 100. Summary score range from 0-100, the higher the score the greater the impairment.
Time frame: Week 12 to week 24
The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF) scores will include total score, symptoms, cough, energy and impacts scores. The score range is from 0-100, the higher the score, the greater the impairment.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to week 12
Proportion of patients requiring an increased dose or a change in their glucocorticoid (GC) / immunosuppression (IS) agent for clinical worsening/flare of MA-ILD
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 12
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT)as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT)as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time frame: baseline (week 0) at week 12
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Percent change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit.
Time frame: baseline (week 0) at week 24
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Percent change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
FVC (ml) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Time to designated change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit and time since baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Defined as either time for event a, b or c Event a. ≥ 10% decline in FVC (mL) or death or transplant Event b. ILD worsening definition (per protocol) or death or transplant Event c. non-elective hospitalization for ILD worsening/flare or death or lung transplant
Time frame: baseline (week 0) at week 12
FVC (%) are forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary
Time frame: baseline (week 0) at week 24
FVC (%) are forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
FVC (%) is forced vital capacity parameter derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Time to designated change is calculated based on change from baseline to a follow up visit and time since baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Compare the patient recruitment, enrollment, screen failure and drop out rates between patient recruited through local clinical trial sites vs. remote clinical trial site.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Reliability is measured as test (baseline) and re-test (week 1) correlation of FVC in ml using spearman correlation.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
Validity of FVC (ml) by home spirometry is measured as spearman correlation with FVC (ml) obtained by gold standard clinic spirometry.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
DLCO is diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Changes from baseline to follow up will be calculated and compared between two treatment arms.
Time frame: weeks 12 and 24
Connective Tissue Disease (CTD)-ILD outcome as per Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT), which is defined as the occurrence of any of the following: death or lung transplant or FVC ≥10% decline or FVC ≥5% decline with DLCO ≥15% decline Clinical worsening is defined as death, lung transplant, or new/worsening O2 requirement at rest (>2L), or non-elective hospitalization for ILD clinical worsening/flare or ILD worsening definition (per protocol) or out of protocol rescue medication for ILD clinical worsening/flare.
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Comparing change of steroid from baseline to follow up, between 2 treatment groups
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Comparing change in oxygen requirement from baseline to follow up, between 2 treatment groups
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Comparing change in oxygen requirement from baseline to follow up, between 2 treatment groups
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Patient Assessment of Change (also known as Patient Global Impression of Change): Overall Assessment of Change by Patient. Patient overall assessment of change in disease status from baseline, reported as 7-point ordinal scale: no change, minimal, moderate, and major worsening as well as minimal, moderate and major improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Physician's overall assessment of change in disease status of the patient from baseline, reported as 7-point ordinal scale: no change, minimal, moderate, and major worsening as well as minimal, moderate and major improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Cadence: highest step counts performed in a minute for a given day. Higher value is better.
Mean change in cadence from baseline to week 12.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Average daily step count measured by mean of daily step count for 7 days, where daily step counts in a day divided by time the device was worn. Higher value is better.
Mean change in average daily step count from baseline to week 12
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Cadence: highest step counts performed in a minute for a given day. Higher value is better.
Mean change in cadence from baseline to week 24.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Average daily step count measured by mean of daily step count for 7 days, where daily step counts in a day divided by time the device was worn. Higher value is better.
Mean change in average daily step count from baseline to week 24.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks
Evaluate the changes in Sit to Stand test score from baseline to follow up , between two treatment arms
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Evaluate the changes in Sit to Stand test score from baseline to follow up , between two treatment arms
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to 24 weeks
Change in HRCT will be analyzed using semi-quantitative and quantitative image based scoring. Change from baseline to follow up will be calculated and compared between two treatment arm
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
All AEs and tolerance event will be compared between 2 treatment arms
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) to week 24
FEV1 is forced expiratory volume over 1 second (FEV1) derived from a pulmonary function study (PFT) in volume as ml and as percentage predicted of healthy standards (in %), respectively. Changes from baseline to follow up will be calculated and compared between two treatment arms.
Rohit Aggarwal, MD
Other
Nintedanib Plus Standard of Care Immunosuppression Versus Standard of Care Immunosuppression Alone in Patients With Progressive Fibrotic Myositis Associated - Interstitial Lung Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Exploratory Trial
Acronym: MINT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03215927
Interstitial Lung Disease, Lung Diseases
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01862926
Connective Tissue Diseases, Dermatomyositis
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06665256
Connective Tissue Diseases, Dermatomyositis
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06696027
ANCA Associated Vasculitis (AAV), Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial Details