Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT06850857

Multi-Institutional IMPACT Validation

The goal of this observational study is to validate a novel patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients suffering maxillofacial trauma: The Integrated Modular Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma (IMPACT). The primary question is:

Are the IMPACT modules valid and reliable measures to study quality-of-life (QOL) in patients with maxillofacial trauma?

Patients presenting for routine clinic follow-up for maxillofacial trauma will be invited to complete the IMPACT in addition to the 15 Dimension (15D) QOL survey as a control.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: Maxillofacial trauma literature is dominated by objective and physician-rated outcomes, leaving a paucity of patient-reported outcome (PRO) research. In fact, no PRO measure (PROM) has ever been validated in this population, posing a tremendous barrier to our understanding of the patient experience. This project will overcome this barrier by validating a novel PROM designed by our research group: The Integrated Modular Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma (IMPACT). The IMPACT is the first PROM designed for maxillofacial trauma, providing novel insight into the patient experience. In its current form, it is a 4-module survey instrument: one general module for all patients (IMPACT-G) and 3 modules specific to fractures of the nasal (IMPACT-N), orbital (IMPACT-O), and/or jaw (IMPACT-J) regions. Each module takes 2-5 minutes to complete for a total of 2-20 minutes, depending on the injury.

Objectives: This study will be a multi-institutional field test to determine the validity and reliability of using the IMPACT for measuring QOL in patients suffering maxillofacial trauma. The hypothesis is that each IMPACT module and subscale will significantly and at least moderately correlate with the 15D, an established general QOL survey instrument.

Methods: Patients with maxillofacial trauma presenting for routine follow-up within one year from their injury will be invited to complete the IMPACT and the 15D survey. Patients who completed an initial survey and return within one month will be invited to complete a second follow-up survey. The scores be tested for validity and reliability using multivariable linear regression, Pearson's r, Cronbach alpha, and test-retest reliability. The sensitivity to change and minimally clinically important difference (MCID) will also be calculated.

Impact: Validation of the first PROM for maxillofacial trauma is anticipated to have a significant and lasting impact in the field of maxillofacial trauma. This will allow researchers and clinicians to better understand the patient experience and make management recommendations accordingly. Integrating the IMPACT into future studies may revolutionize the field by providing novel evidence for controversial topics such as maxillomandibular fixation techniques, surgical approaches, adjunctive therapies, and more.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of maxillofacial trauma (fracture of any facial bone[s] and/or soft tissue injury) within 12 months of recruitment date.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients presenting to clinic for reasons not related to maxillofacial trauma.
  • Patients with isolated fractures of the cranium or teeth.
  • Patients who cannot read, write, and/or speak English.
  • Patients who are unable to provide informed consent for themselves (including those who are under 18 years old, incapacitated, intoxicated, or cognitively impaired with a legal guardian)

Treatment and study plan

IMPACT-G Module

Other

Administration of the general IMPACT survey module.

IMPACT-N Module

Other

Administration of the IMPACT-N survey module.

IMPACT-O Module

Other

Administration of the IMPACT-O survey module.

IMPACT-J Module

Other

Administration of the IMPACT-J survey module.

15D Control Survey

Other

Administration of the 15D QOL control survey.

Primary outcomes

  1. Criterion validity: Correlation of IMPACT modules with the 15D QOL control survey

    Time frame: When the initial survey is completed (within 12 months of the injury).

    Criterion validity will primarily be determined by calculating the correlation between each of the IMPACT module total scores and the 15D QOL control survey via Pearson's r, controlling for independent variables that influence survey scores.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reliability: Covariance of each item in the IMPACT modules and subscales

    Time frame: When the initial survey is completed (within 12 months of the injury).

    The reliability of each module and subscale will be measured via Cronbach alpha's measurement of internal consistency,

  2. Sensitivity to Change: Change in IMPACT scores over the treatment course.

    Time frame: At the completion of the second survey.

    The sensitivity to change will be evaluated by comparing consecutive IMPACT module and subscale scores for patients who completed the survey two times.

  3. Sensitivity to Change: Change in IMPACT scores over the treatment course.

    Time frame: Baseline (at recruitement, Day 0) and at 4 weeks.

    Follow-up IMPACT scores will be collected 4 weeks from the baseline recruitment and analyzed for improvement from the baseline scores.

  4. Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID)

    Time frame: When the initial survey is completed (within 12 months of the injury).

    The MCID will be calculated for each IMPACT module and subscale via an anchor-based approach, using a single global question designed to comprehensively assess how the patient feels regarding their facial injury.

Other outcomes

  1. Independent predictors of IMPACT scores

    Time frame: When the initial survey is completed (within 12 months of the injury).

    Independent variables that influence IMPACT scores for each module and subscale will be evaluated, including: demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity), socioeconomic factors (social-vulnerability index, type of insurance), severity of trauma (Comprehensive facial injury [CFI] and Facial Injury Severity Score [score]), primary management (observation, closed treatment, and/or maxillomandibular fixation), multisystem trauma, and level of care (discharged from ED, admitted to floor / stepdown, or admitted to ICU).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Tennessee

Other

Collaborators

  • University of California, Davis
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • University of Maryland
  • Vanderbilt University

Registry information

Official study title

Multi-Institutional Validation of the Integrated Modular Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma (IMPACT)

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 27, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.