Hospital Universitario Dexeus
Barcelona, 08022, Spain
NCT Number: NCT03292770
Despite these revolutionary changes in the laboratory, little has changed with the process of embryo transfer (ET). A study to prospectively evaluate the role of cervical mucus removal prior to embryo transfer on pregnancy rates in ART will be undertaken.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 40 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Barcelona, 08022, Spain
ET involves placing the embryo(s) obtained before assisted reproduction technology (ART) into the uterus via a catheter advanced through the cervical canal. Yet this is the final, and in some respects the most critical, process in the sequential events that encompass an ART cycle. If an embryo cannot be delivered to the uterine cavity atraumatically and in a location for optimal implantation, the steps of ovarian hyperstimulation, oocyte retrieval, embryo culture, and embryo selection will have no benefit. Contamination of the catheter with blood may be a marker for difficult ET and has also been linked to poor ET outcomes. When retrospectively assessing outcomes, Goudas et al. (1) demonstrated a clinical pregnancy rate of 50% with no blood, and this rate fell by half when a small amount of blood was noted on the catheter tip. Pregnancy rates fell even further, to 10%, when there was a significant amount of blood (1). Similarly, in a preliminary study, blood or mucus on the tip was associated with a significantly lower pregnancy outcome (2). Blood and mucus were associated with an increased risk for unsuccessful transfers with odds ratios of 1.9 and 1.8, respectively. Although all these data suggest a possible role of cervical mucus in embryo transfer, there is no clinical evidence on the effect of removal of cervical mucus on the outcome of IVF/ICSI. In view of this uncertainty, a study to prospectively evaluate the role of cervical mucus removal prior to embryo transfer on pregnancy rates in ART will be undertaken. It is hypothesized that removal of cervical mucus will achieve higher clinical pregnancy rates.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A catheter will be used to performed a flushing of the cervical canal with culture media.
Time frame: 20 days after embryo transfer
Defined as the proportion of patients with a gestational sac seen 20 days after embryo transfer
Time frame: 9 days after embryo transfer
Defined as the proportion of patients with ≥25 mIU/L of serum βhCG 9 days after embryo transfer
Time frame: 20 days after embryo transfer
Defined as the proportion of patients with a pregnancy loss following a positive pregnancy test and/or a detectable gestational sac
Fundacion Dexeus
Other
EFFICACY STUDY OF THE UTILIZATION OF A FLUSHING CATHETER FOR REMOVAL OF CERVICAL MUCUS BEFORE AN EMBRYO TRANSFER: A RANDOMIZED PILOT CONTROLLED TRIAL
Acronym: MUCRET
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07499817
Embryo Transfer, Genital Diseases
Banī Suwayf, Beni Suweif Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07020975
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Girne Kepuveia, Keryneia, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT06659692
Genital Diseases, Infertility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06924437
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB), Endometrial Polyp
Sohag, Egypt
View Trial Details