Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07345663

Modified Continuous Versus Interrupted Choledochotomy Closure in LCBDE With T-Tube Drainage

This observational study aims to compare two techniques for closing the common bile duct incision (choledochotomy) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with T-tube drainage. Interrupted suturing is commonly used, but it can be time-consuming during laparoscopic surgery. A modified continuous suturing approach may improve efficiency while maintaining safety.

We will retrospectively review patients who underwent LCBDE with T-tube drainage at our institution. Patients will be grouped according to the choledochotomy closure technique used during routine clinical care (modified continuous suturing versus conventional interrupted closure). To reduce baseline differences between groups, propensity score matching based on preoperative and intraoperative characteristics will be applied.

The primary outcome is choledochotomy closure time. Secondary outcomes include total operative time and perioperative safety outcomes, such as bile leakage and other postoperative complications, as well as short-term postoperative recovery indicators. This study will provide comparative evidence on operative efficiency and safety of continuous versus interrupted choledochotomy closure in the setting of LCBDE with T-tube drainage.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Yantai affiliated hospital of Binzhou Medical University

Yantai, Shandong, 264100, China

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • (1) age ≥18 years; (2) imaging-confirmed CBDS; (3) intraoperative placement of a T-tube; and (4) Common bile duct (CBD) diameter ≥6 mm

Exclusion criteria

  • coagulopathy, severe cognitive impairment, multiple intrahepatic stones, biliary stricture, malignancy, liver cirrhosis, severe acute pancreatitis (BISAP score ≥3), and acute cholangitis complicated by septic shock, classified as Grade III according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018

Treatment and study plan

Modified continuous suture

Procedure

Modified continuous suture was performed using 4-0 knotless barbed polydioxanone sutures (Quill™, Surgical Specialties Corporation). A continuous full-thickness suture was placed from the distal (duodenal) end to the proximal (hepatic) end, with bites of approximately 2 mm and a stitch interval of 3-4 mm. After completion of the continuous closure, 1-2 reinforcing stitches were placed in the opposite direction (from proximal to distal), and the suture was secured by tying to the tail end of the initial stitch.

Interrupted suture

Procedure

Interrupted suture was performed using 4-0 antibacterial monofilament polydioxanone sutures (PDS™ Plus, Ethicon, LLC). Interrupted sutures were placed from the distal (duodenal) end to the proximal (hepatic) end, with bites of approximately 2 mm and a stitch interval of 3-4 mm; each stitch was tied separately. An additional 1-2 reinforcing stitches (transverse or figure-of-eight) were placed around the T-tube exit site to enhance apposition between the choledochotomy edge and the tube wall.

Primary outcomes

  1. Choledochotomy Closure Time

    Time frame: Closure time is measured intraoperatively during the procedure and recorded once closure is complete.

    The time taken to complete choledochotomy closure, from the beginning of suturing to the completion of the final knot. This measure is recorded in minutes for each patient.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Operative Time

    Time frame: The total operative time is measured during the procedure, from the first incision to the final closure.

    The total time from the initiation of the procedure to the completion of the surgery. This includes all steps of the surgery, from incision to closure.

Other outcomes

  1. Intraoperative Blood Loss

    Time frame: Blood loss is recorded intraoperatively at the end of the surgery, based on visual estimation and suction collection.

    The total estimated blood loss during the surgery, as measured by the surgeon and recorded at the end of the procedure. This is typically recorded in milliliters.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Modified Continuous Versus Interrupted Choledochotomy Closure in LCBDE With T-Tube Drainage: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.