Yantai affiliated hospital of Binzhou Medical University
Yantai, Shandong, 264100, China
NCT Number: NCT07345663
This observational study aims to compare two techniques for closing the common bile duct incision (choledochotomy) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with T-tube drainage. Interrupted suturing is commonly used, but it can be time-consuming during laparoscopic surgery. A modified continuous suturing approach may improve efficiency while maintaining safety.
We will retrospectively review patients who underwent LCBDE with T-tube drainage at our institution. Patients will be grouped according to the choledochotomy closure technique used during routine clinical care (modified continuous suturing versus conventional interrupted closure). To reduce baseline differences between groups, propensity score matching based on preoperative and intraoperative characteristics will be applied.
The primary outcome is choledochotomy closure time. Secondary outcomes include total operative time and perioperative safety outcomes, such as bile leakage and other postoperative complications, as well as short-term postoperative recovery indicators. This study will provide comparative evidence on operative efficiency and safety of continuous versus interrupted choledochotomy closure in the setting of LCBDE with T-tube drainage.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Yantai, Shandong, 264100, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Modified continuous suture was performed using 4-0 knotless barbed polydioxanone sutures (Quill™, Surgical Specialties Corporation). A continuous full-thickness suture was placed from the distal (duodenal) end to the proximal (hepatic) end, with bites of approximately 2 mm and a stitch interval of 3-4 mm. After completion of the continuous closure, 1-2 reinforcing stitches were placed in the opposite direction (from proximal to distal), and the suture was secured by tying to the tail end of the initial stitch.
Interrupted suture was performed using 4-0 antibacterial monofilament polydioxanone sutures (PDS™ Plus, Ethicon, LLC). Interrupted sutures were placed from the distal (duodenal) end to the proximal (hepatic) end, with bites of approximately 2 mm and a stitch interval of 3-4 mm; each stitch was tied separately. An additional 1-2 reinforcing stitches (transverse or figure-of-eight) were placed around the T-tube exit site to enhance apposition between the choledochotomy edge and the tube wall.
Time frame: Closure time is measured intraoperatively during the procedure and recorded once closure is complete.
The time taken to complete choledochotomy closure, from the beginning of suturing to the completion of the final knot. This measure is recorded in minutes for each patient.
Time frame: The total operative time is measured during the procedure, from the first incision to the final closure.
The total time from the initiation of the procedure to the completion of the surgery. This includes all steps of the surgery, from incision to closure.
Time frame: Blood loss is recorded intraoperatively at the end of the surgery, based on visual estimation and suction collection.
The total estimated blood loss during the surgery, as measured by the surgeon and recorded at the end of the procedure. This is typically recorded in milliliters.
Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University
Other
Modified Continuous Versus Interrupted Choledochotomy Closure in LCBDE With T-Tube Drainage: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07058740
Biliary Tract Diseases, Calculi
Yantai, Shandong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05945797
Bile Duct Diseases, Bile Duct Neoplasms
Gujranwala, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06676241
Acute Pancreatitis (AP), Bile Duct Diseases
Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT06672991
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia
View Trial Details