Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02851927

Mini Thoracoscopy vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Exudative Pleural Effusions

Undiagnosed pleural effusion is a diagnostic dilemma especially in exudative pleural effusions (EPE). 20-40 % are unable to be attributed to a specific diagnosis, even after thoracentesis and closed pleural biopsy. Thoracoscopy has been demonstrated to increase the diagnostic yield in undiagnosed EPE. The diagnostic yield of thoracoscopy in malignant and TB pleural effusion ranges from 91% to 94% and 93% to 100%, respectively.

Rigid thoracoscopy has traditionally been the modality of choice. The recently introduced semirigid thoracoscope provides ease of handling like a flexible bronchoscope. However, there are concerns about the diagnostic yield of semi-rigid thoracoscopy when compared with rigid thoracoscopy. According to the available literature, the yield of semirigid and rigid thoracoscopy is almost similar if adequate pleural biopsy is obtained. However there are concerns that with semi-rigid thoracoscope, there might be greater incidence of inability to obtain adequate pleural biopsy. On the other hand, the use of conventional rigid thoracoscope may be associated with greater procedure related pain.Mini-Thoracoscopy is a newer rigid thoracoscopy instrument which is smaller in diameter (5.5 mm) and may allow pleural biopsy with a smaller incision. There is scant literature on its utility. The investigators hereby propose to undertake a randomized comparison of rigid 'mini thoracoscope' vs semi rigid thoracoscope in undiagnosed pleural effusions.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

New Delhi, 110029, India

About this study

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria and giving prior consent for the study shall be randomised. The randomization sequence will be computer generated with variable block size and the assignments will be placed in opaque sealed envelopes. All patients will undergo hemogram, liver and renal function tests, coagulation profile, an electrocardiogram and Computed tomography (CT) of the chest before entering the study. Chest ultrasound will be performed in all patients to evaluate the rib spaces, amount of pleural fluid and for selection of the entry point.

Instruments The semi-rigid thoracoscope to be used is the autoclavable Olympus LTF-160 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) thoracoscope with 2.8 mm inner channel diameter and 7 mm outer diameter. The forceps is flexible forceps with alligator jaw with spike cusps, 2.8 mm of the outer diameter. The rigid mini thoracoscope is the Richard Wolf 5.5 mm operating endoscope with the working channel.

Thoracoscopy technique Thoracoscopy will be performed in the interventional pulmonology lab. Patients shall be fasting for solids for 8 hours and for liquids 6 hours. Patients shall be having continuous monitoring of blood pressure, pulse rate, and oxygen saturation.

Topical anesthesia will be achieved by infiltrating 2% lidocaine locally at the incision site. The procedure shall be performed under conscious sedation and analgesia using a combination of midazolam and intravenous fentanyl. An incision shall be made at the site of maximum fluid thickness as assessed by pre-procedural USG chest, with the patient in lateral decubitus position and involved side upward. After incision, the appropriately sized trocar shall be placed through the skin into the pleural space. The thoracoscope shall be inserted through the trocar. The pleural surfaces shall then be thoroughly inspected. A minimum of 6-8 pleural biopsy samples shall be obtained by semi-rigid thoracoscope and at least 4 with rigid mini-thoracoscope.

Samples shall be sent for histopathological analysis and mycobacterial cultures. At the end of the procedure, a chest tube shall be placed and removed subsequently.

All patients shall be followed up for a period of six months from the time of procedure if non-specific inflammation/ fibrinous pleuritis is the diagnosis or no definitive diagnosis is made during that time.

Statistical analysis:

Data shall be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or percentage. Differences in continuous variables between the two groups shall be compared using Student's t test (or Mann-Whitney U test); while differences in categorical data shall be compared using the chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test). A p value of less than 0.05 shall be considered statistically significant.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18 years Presence of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion as determined by the criteria detailed by Light et al where a specific diagnosis was not obtained after initial cytological and/or microbiological examinations.

Adequate rib spaces for successful performance of thoracoscopy as judged by clinical examination Adequate pleural fluid space as judged by pre-procedural USG chest

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulopathy (platelet count < 50000/mm3, INR > 1.5)
  • Unstable hemodynamic status ( SBP > 180, DBP> 100 or SBP< 90 mm Hg / heart failure
  • Myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 wk
  • Hypoxemia not correctable with low flow oxygen (SpO2 <90% despite low flow oxygen @ 1-2 l/min)
  • Extensive rib crowding as judged by clinical examination
  • Extensive adhesions and lack of pleural space on USG chest
  • Refusal of consent

Treatment and study plan

Mini Thoracoscopy

Procedure

Pleural biopsy using rigid mini thoracoscope

SemiRigid Thoracoscopy

Procedure

Pleural biopsy using semirigid thoracoscope

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Yield

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Proportion of diagnostic biopsies in the two arms

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sedation dose

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Comparison of sedative and analgesic agent doses between the two groups

  2. Complications

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Complications related to the procedure

  3. Procedural pain

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Patient rated procedural pain on Visual Analogue Scale

  4. Operator rated pain

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Operator rated procedural pain on Visual Analogue Scale

  5. Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction on Visual Analogue Scale

  6. Biopsy Size

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Mean size of biopsy obtained during pleural biopsy procedure

  7. Alternate equipment

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Requirement of conversion to alternate equipment for pleural biopsy

  8. Image quality

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Operator rated image quality of pleural visualization (VAS)

Other outcomes

  1. Ease of biopsy

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Ease of obtaining pleural biopsy on visual analogue scale

  2. Operator rated pain on scope manipulation

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Operator rated pain on scope manipulation on Visual analogue scale (VAS)

  3. Expectation of diagnostic biopsy

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Expectation that biopsy will be diagnostic on Visual Analogue Scale

  4. Ease of manoeuvring thoracoscope

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Ease of scope maneuvering on Visual Analogue Scale

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Rigid 'Mini-thoracoscopy' vs Semirigid Thoracoscopy in Undiagnosed Exudative Pleural Effusions : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: MIST

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 2, 2016
Registry last updated
Dec 27, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.