Episodic Future Thinking
BehavioralParticipants will be instructed to use their episodic future cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.
Other names: EFT
NCT Number: NCT03664726
The proposed research will translate research on delay discounting to the prevention of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in persons with prediabetes. In this study, the investigators will verify target engagement (DD) by examining if EFT improves DD under conditions shown to increase discounting of the future. Prediabetics will be randomized to receive EFT/ERT in a factorial design when experiencing simulated poverty/neutral conditions, respectively. The effects will be measured on DD. The investigators predict that poverty conditions will increase discounting of the future for ERT subjects, but those receiving EFT will show levels of DD similar to levels observed for participants in the wealth condition.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University at Buffalo, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Buffalo, New York, United States
The prevention of Type 2 diabetes in an obese person with prediabetes requires developing a healthier lifestyle. The rational approach for someone with prediabetes would be to eat healthier, be more active, lose weight, and manage their comorbidities. However, preliminary research suggests that individuals with Type 2 diabetes discount the future and engage in behaviors that maximize current pleasure and short-term gain; thus, daily choices needed to improve future health are rare in this population. Delay discounting (DD) describes the choice of smaller immediate versus larger delayed rewards. This behavioral process is related to a wide variety of health choices, ranging from preventive health to behavioral and medical regimen adherence, including regimens used for Type 2 diabetes. The investigators believe that DD provides a target for one type of self-regulation that can improve a wide variety of health behaviors and medical adherence.
Research from our laboratories has shown that episodic future thinking (EFT), a form of prospection which reduces the bias towards immediate gratification, activates brain regions involved in planning and prospection such that future rewards have increased value and the extent of delay discounting is reduced. Cueing individuals to think about future events during inter-temporal decision-making reduces the rate of DD, eating in and outside of the laboratory, and smoking behavior. The overarching goal of this research is to use an experimental medicine approach to translate basic research on DD and EFT into clinical interventions to prevent the transition from prediabetes to a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prior participation in similar studies: Individuals who have recently participated in a laboratory study using similar methods may also be excluded.
Participants will be instructed to use their episodic future cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.
Other names: EFT
Participants will be instructed to use their episodic recent cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.
Other names: ERT
Participants will read a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset, in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have lost their job and have no current secondary income.
Other names: Scarcity
Participants will read a narrative in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have been transferred between departmental jobs, with little change in salary/commute.
Other names: Neutral
Time frame: Delay Discounting will be measured at baseline (session 1) and after receiving EFT/ERT and Scarcity/Narrative (within about 2 weeks)
Delay Discounting will be measured using monetary Delay Discounting tasks with $100 as the delayed reward. Delay discounting is assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC), or time*indifference point/delay. AUC for delay discounting included time (x-axis) and indifference point (y-axis), or the amount of money at which the immediate and delayed options are approximately equal. Indifference points are a percentage of the max amount (range 0 - 100). AUC adds the calculated areas for each timepoint from the previous timepoint. Ordinal AUC was used as the measure. Ordinal AUC normalizes the horizontal axis time points to have equal distances between them. AUC ranges from 0 (most impulsive, did not choose delay) to 100 (least impulsive, always chose delay).
This is the difference in delay discounting between session 2 and session 1. Larger numbers indicate a decrease in discounting, or less impulsive, while smaller/negative numbers indicate an increase in discounting, or more impulsive.
Time frame: Session 2
Reinforcing value of food was measured using the relative reinforcing efficacy questionnaire in which participants are asked how many portions of food they would purchase at various prices. Intensity is the number of portions they would purchase and consume when the price is $0.
Time frame: Working Memory will be measured at baseline (session 1) and after receiving EFT/ERT Scarcity/Neutral intervention (up to 2 weeks post-baseline)
Backwards Corsi is a task that assesses visuo-spatial short term working memory. Participants are asked to watch a series of squares on a computer screen and repeat the sequence backwards. This is done several times and the highest number of correctly remembered locations is the span score, with a possible score of 2 - 9 locations total. Span score represents the number of locations that can be recalled backwards. Larger span scores indicate more locations can be remembered and recalled correctly backwards. This is the difference in score between session 2 and session 1. Larger numbers indicate greater change during the experimental manipulation or better working memory, while smaller or negative numbers indicates lower working memory during the experimental manipulation versus baseline. Numbers close to 0 represent little to no change.
Leonard Epstein
Other
Delay Discounting as a Target for Self-Regulation in Prediabetes
Acronym: MINDD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07618663
Diabetes Mellitus, Endocrine System Diseases
Lahore, Shaikhupura, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT05351359
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Prague, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT07713394
Behavior, Body Weight
Erzurum, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07710898
Diabete Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial Details