Per Henrik Lambert
Aalborg, Ålborg, 9000, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT01530152
Aim:
The aim of the method evaluation study is a comparing study of Truview PCD™ (Picture Capture Device) laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope. The result of this study will form a basis for a possible recommendation of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope in our organisation.
The laryngoscopes are compared according to their ability to visualize the glottis area measured by the Cormack Lehane (CL) grade and the time used to get the best CL grade.
A registration of any damage of tissue/teeths caused by the laryngoscopes, and a possible decrease of the saturation will also be made.
Hypothesis:
The Truview PCD™ laryngoscope provides a better view of the vocal cords and thereby makes the intubation les difficult.
CL 1 is achieved in 90 percent of intubations with the Macintosh laryngoscope, and the hypothesis of the study is that CL 1 can be increased to 98 percent by use of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aalborg, Ålborg, 9000, Denmark
The unexpected difficult intubation is, like the difficult mask ventilation, a feared complication to anaesthesia.
A difficult intubation occurs in approx. 1.2 - 3.8 percent of all anaesthesias .
The standard procedure of intubation in Denmark is to use the curved Macintosh blade. This method, however, has some limits, as it requires a direct view of the area of the vocal cords. For that reason we are looking for new methods of intubation that can give a better overview.
The Truview PCD™ laryngoscope is a commercially available laryngoscope with an integrated optical lens that can be connected to a camera head, and gives a better view of trachea during intubation under a general anaestetic. Furthermore it is possible to connect 8-10 liters of oxygen per minute to the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope, which will prevent fog on the viewtube and slow down the rate of desaturation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The aim of the method evaluation study is a comparing study of Truview PCD™ laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope. The result of this study will form a basis for a possible recommendation of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope in our organisation.
The laryngoscopes are compared according to their ability to visualize the glottis area measured by the Cormack Lehane (CL) grade and the time used to get the best CL grade. (See figure 1.) A registration of any damage of tissue/teeths caused by the laryngoscopes, and a possible decrease of the saturation will also be made.
Other names: laryngoscopi, generel anaesthesia, lidocain spray
Time frame: The seconds during intubation where the anaesthesiologist view the vocal cords to determine the CL grade..
At the first laryngoscopy the patient is sprayed between plica vocalis with Lidocaine 4%, then the patient is ventilated by a mask. During the next laryngoscopy the intubation is performed (the endotracheal tube is placed in trachea).
The patients are randomized by lottery as to which laryngoscope to be used first.
After anesthesia induction, preceded by 3 minutes of preoxygenering, the first laryngoscope is used when spraying the patient with Lidocaine. Subsequently the patient is ventilated for 2 minutes, and then the intubation is performed by using the other laryngoscope.
Aalborg University Hospital
Other
Method Evaluation Study of Truview PCD Versus MacIntosh Laryngoscope
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07730918
Hemodynamic Instability During Anesthesia, Induction Anesthesia
Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05825560
Intubation
Nîmes, Gard, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05719194
Intubation, Mechanical Ventilation
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07125495
Infection, Infections
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details