minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum
Proceduresubsternal insertion of a metal bar
NCT Number: NCT04751266
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a metal wear debris after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum and if there's a clinical relevance. Our hypothesis is that the metal bar after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum leads to a locally and systemic immune reaction due to elevated metal contamination.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year–45 year
All sexes
Observational
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
substernal insertion of a metal bar
Time frame: 4 years
measurement of:
at the time points:
We will compare the mean metal values at each time point post implantation with the mean metal values pre implantation. Clinical data like body weight etc. won't be relevant for the analysis.
Time frame: 4 years
measurement of: 2) chromium in urine (in µg/l)
at the time points:
We will compare the mean metal values at each time point post implantation with the mean metal values pre implantation. Clinical data like body weight etc. won't be relevant for the analysis.
Time frame: 3 years
measurement of: 3) chromium in tissue (in µg/g)
at the time points:
We will compare the mean metal values at explantation with the mean metal values before implantation. Clinical data like body weight etc. won't be relevant for the analysis.
Time frame: 4 years
measurement of: 4) nickel in blood (in µg/l)
at the time points:
We will compare the mean metal values at each time point post implantation with the mean metal values pre implantation. Clinical data like body weight etc. won't be relevant for the analysis.
Time frame: 4 years
measurement of: 5) nickel in urine (in µg/l)
at the time points:
We will compare the mean metal values at each time point post implantation with the mean metal values pre implantation. Clinical data like body weight etc. won't be relevant for the analysis.
Time frame: 3 years
measurement of: 6) nickel in tissue (in µg/g)
at the time points:
We will compare the mean metal values at explantation with the mean metal values before implantation. Clinical data like body weight etc. won't be relevant for the analysis.
Time frame: 4 years
observation (description) of clinical symptoms of a metal allergy like
for the time the bar is in place (3 years) and the metal values are evaluated.
-> Then compare the mean metal values (see above) with the baseline and the other patients (with and/or without problems)
No records when the patients don't have any problems.
Dr. Caroline Fortmann
Other
Examination of Metal Contamination After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum (MIRPE) and the Clinical Relevance
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05451108
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07300748
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07498699
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Heerlen, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05731973
Agnosia, Bone Diseases
Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands
View Trial Details