Department of internal medicine and clinical nutrition, University olf Gothenburg
Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07213245
The overall aim of this project is to study the effects of short-term high ultra-processed food intake, compared to nutrient- and energy density matched low ultra-processed food (UPF) intake, on energy intake and appetite.
A total of 24 men and women who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be invited to participate. A randomized 2*2 factorial four-way crossover study will be conducted at the Department of Internal medicine and Clinical Nutrition at the University of Gothenburg, comparing a high-UPF meal to a low-UPF meal also with high and/or low energy density. A supervised breakfast meal will be served, and postprandial blood samples and appetite measures will be collected continuously up to 4 hours after the breakfast meal. Subsequently, an ad libitum lunch meal will be served, and energy intake will be recorded.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Meal high in energy density, high in ultra-processed food
Meal high in energy density, low in ultra-processed food
Meal low in energy density, high in ultra-processed food
Meal low in energy density, low in ultra-processed food
Time frame: Baseline to 8 hours after test meal
Appetite ratings (hunger, fullness, and desire to eat) will be assessed using separate 100-mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), anchored with "not at all" (0 mm) and "extremely" (100 mm). Higher scores indicate greater perceived intensity.
Time frame: 4 hours after test meal
Energy intake estimated by nutrient calculation of leftover food at the ad libitum lunch meal
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Difference between groups in incretins GIP and GLP-1 in response to meal
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Difference between groups in cholecystokinin in response to meal
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Difference between groups in peptide YY (PYY) in response to meal
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Difference between groups in ghrelin in response to meal
Time frame: Baseline til end of study meal
Time it takes to eat the study meal until satisfied
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Difference between groups in postprandial glucose in response to meal.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Difference between groups in postprandial insulin in response to meal.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Difference between groups in postprandial lipid metabolism in response to meal.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Differences between groups in metabolome (plasma) measured using metabolomics in response to meals.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Differences between groups in proteome (plasma) measured using proteomics in response to meals.
Time frame: From 30 min until midnight or bedtime (which ever comes first)
Self-reported prospective energy intake during the remainder of the day
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Differences between groups in immunological responses (cytokines) in response to meal.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Differences between groups in immunological responses (lipopolysaccharides) in response to meal.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Differences between groups in immunological responses (GlycA) in response to meal.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours after test meal
Differences between groups in lipid profile (plasma) measured using lipidomics in response to meals.
Time frame: Baseline
Correlation between baseline proteome measured using proteomics and the primary outcome energy intake
Time frame: Baseline
Correlation between baseline metabolome measured using metabolomics and primary outcome energy intake
Time frame: Baseline
Correlation between baseline body composition (fat percentage and fat free mass percentage) measured using Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and primary outcome energy intake
Time frame: Baseline
Correlation between baseline metabolic markers, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and triglycerides measured via standard clinical chemistry methods, and primary outcome energy intake
Time frame: Baseline
Correlation between baseline self-reported physical activity and primary outcome energy intake
Time frame: Baseline
Correlation between baseline diet (macro- and micronutrient intake, dietary patterns, food group intake) estimated from a 4-day dietary record and primary outcome energy intake
Time frame: Baseline
Correlation between baseline gut microbiome composition-assessed using metagenomic shotgun sequencing and 16S rRNA analysis-and the primary outcome of energy intake.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Linnea Bärebring, PhD
CONTACT
Therese Karlsson, PhD
CONTACT
Göteborg University
Other
Metabolic Effects of Short-term Ultra-processed Food Intake (MEST-UPF): a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07178405
Appetite, Body Weight
Gothenburg, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07611201
Anosmia, Appetite
West Lafayette, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07597382
Appetite, Body Weight
Yongzhou, Hunan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06327464
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial Details