Mesh Infection After Hernioplasty: Complete vs Partial Removal - Retrospective Study on Outcomes and Pathogen Analysis

We conducted a single-center, retrospective case series analysis. We included patients who developed mesh infection after tension-free IHR and underwent surgical treatment at our center between January 2016 and December 2025. Patients with mesh infection after incisional, parastomal, or umbilical hernia repair were excluded. We also excluded patients who improved with conservative treatment and did not undergo surgery.

We collected the following data: demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory and imaging results, characteristics of the primary hernia surgery, infection characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes. All data were entered into a standardized database. Follow-up was conducted through outpatient visits and telephone interviews. The last follow-up was on October 30, 2025.

Inclusion criteria

• Patients who underwent tension-free inguinal hernioplasty with mesh placement.
• Patients diagnosed with mesh infection requiring surgical re-intervention.
• Patients who underwent complete or partial mesh removal surgery.
• Availability of complete medical records and follow-up data.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with mesh infection managed conservatively (without surgical removal).
• Patients with missing critical data (e.g., intraoperative findings, pathogen results, or follow-up).
• Patients with concomitant procedures that could confound outcomes (e.g., simultaneous other hernia repair).
• Patients lost to follow-up immediately after discharge (no postoperative assessment).