Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03105726

Medical Care Versus Ventricular Assist Device for the Management of End-stage Heart Failure (MEVADE)

End-stage heart failure (ESHF) represents a major burden in terms of quality of life, mortality and costs. The current practice in France is to treat patients with ESHF by a combination of drugs and lifestyle interventions before proposing heart transplant (HT) if there is no contraindication. In the Heart and Diabetes Center of Bad Oyenhausen (BO) in Germany, patients presenting with ESHF are preferentially managed by ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of these two strategies in the management of ESHF and associated consumption of resources.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

All patients presenting with end-stage heart failure defined as:

  • A left ventricular ejection fraction ≤25%
  • Or an oxygen consumption peak < 14 mL/kg/min
  • Or severe symptoms (NYHA class III or IV) despite optimal medical treatment
  • Or a cardiogenic shock

Exclusion criteria

  • Age over 70 years
  • Active neoplasia
  • Suspected or active systemic infection
  • Body mass index ≥40 kg/m2
  • Severe chronic obstruction pulmonary disease
  • Evidence of intrinsic hepatic diseases defined as liver enzyme values ≥ 5 times the upper limit of normal within 4 days before the randomisation, or biopsy proven liver cirrhosis
  • Significant chronic renal impairment with persistent creatinine >2.5 or clearance < 25ml/min
  • Pregnant or lactating female
  • Patient under consideration for conventional revascularization procedures, therapeutic valvular repair, left ventricular procedure or cardiomyoplasty
  • Presence of implanted mechanical aortic valve that will not be converted to bioprothesis at the time of ventricular assist device implantation
  • Evidence of intrinsic hepatic diseases defined as liver enzyme values ≥ 5 times the upper limit of normal, or biopsy proven liver cirrhosis
  • Occurrence of stroke within 90 days or history of cerebrovascular disease with major (≥ 80%) extracranial or carotid stenosis documented by Doppler study
  • Confirmation by neurologist of impairment of cognitive function, presence of Alzheimer's disease or any other form of irreversible dementia or both
  • Major peripheral vascular disease accompanied by pain on rest or leg ulceration
  • Recent history of psychiatric disease that is likely to impair compliance
  • Drug or alcohol dependence
  • Difficult social surroundings

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival

    Time frame: two years

    The primary outcome was comparison of survival at two years between the two treatment strategies

Secondary outcomes

  1. Resource consumption

    Time frame: Two years

    One secondary outcomes was comparison of the treatment strategies up to two years of follow-up about resource consumption.

  2. Costs

    Time frame: Two years

    One secondary outcomes was comparison of the treatment strategies up to two years of follow-up about costs.

  3. Costs versus survival

    Time frame: Two years

    One secondary outcomes was comparison of the treatment strategies up to two years of follow-up about costs versus survival.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Joe Elie Salem

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Medical Care Versus Ventricular Assist Device in Patients With NYHA Class IV Congestive Heart Failure: a Non Randomized Comparison of Clinical and Economic Outcomes

Acronym: MEVADE

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2014
First posted
Apr 10, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 27, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.