Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06553131

Median Versus Ulnar Nerve Quantitative Electromyography Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring Comparison

Medications used to relax the muscles are used during surgery. The amount of muscle relaxation can monitored with devices that stimulate a specific nerve and evaluate the muscle response. The response to, and recovery from, medications that relax the muscles are best described for a nerve in the arm called the ulnar nerve. The investigators believe that other nerves in the arm, such as the median nerve, could be used to monitor the amount of muscle relaxation. The purpose of this study is to compare the muscle response at two different nerve sites after giving medications to relax the muscles.

This study is going to measure the depth of muscle relaxation during surgery at two different sites. The muscle response to stimulation of the ulnar nerve (located in the arm) will be compared to the muscle response to stimulation of the median nerve (also located in the arm).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Loma Linda University Troesch Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Edgardo E Reynoso, BA

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Lauren S Pineda, MS

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Melissa D McCabe, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Melissa M McCabe, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

909-558-4475

Michael Benggon, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Morgan E Blazy, BS

CONTACT

[email protected]

9095584227 ext. 44256

Morgan E Blazy, BS

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Richard L Applegate, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Ryan Lauer, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This is a single-center prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing ulnar versus median nerve electromyography transmission.

Neuromuscular blockade is used to provide muscle relaxation during surgery. The depth of neuromuscular blockade can be monitored with nerve stimulation or electromyography. The response to and recovery from non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade is best described for the ulnar nerve. The investigators postulate that the median nerve may provide comparable information about the response non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Electromyography electrodes will be positioned to stimulate the ulnar nerve in one arm and the median nerve in the other arm. The response to, and recovery from, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade will be compared between the ulnar and median nerve.

The location of median nerve monitoring will be randomized to the dominant or non-dominant hand.

The randomized arm will have electrodes positioned to stimulate the median nerve and the other arm will have electrodes positioned to stimulate the ulnar nerve (standard site for monitoring neuromuscular transmission during anesthesia).

The purpose of the study is to compare the response to, and recovery from, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade between the ulnar and median nerves.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults 18 - 75 years of age who are able to provide consent
  • Scheduled for elective surgery requiring muscle relaxation, in a supine position under general anesthesia, with an anticipated duration of at least 1.5 hours

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to rocuronium use
  • Comorbidities that may prolong the duration of neuromuscular blockade or alter pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics, such as:
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Expected or known difficult airway
  • Rocuronium allergy
  • BMI < 18.5 or > 40
  • History of adhesive allergy
  • Upper extremity weakness, limb deformity, or absence of all or part of an upper limb
  • Patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass

Treatment and study plan

Neuromuscular Transmission Monitoring

Device

A neuromuscular transmission module connected to electrodes applied to the skin and positioned to provide stimulation of a single nerve and monitor the muscular response to nerve stimulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Neuromuscular transmission nerve monitoring concordance

    Time frame: Change in time between administration of rocuronium at beginning of surgery and the appearance of one post-tetanic twitch on a monitor, typically 20 minutes after sedation

    The length of time between rocuronium administration and first post-tetanic twitch for both nerves

Secondary outcomes

  1. Non-inferiority of median nerve neuromuscular monitoring compared to ulnar nerve neuromuscular monitoring - first train of four

    Time frame: Change in time between administration of rocuronium at beginning of surgery and the appearance of the first Train-of-Four twitch on a monitor, typically 30 minutes after appearance of post-tetanic twitch

    Time from rocuronium administration to the patient having 1 Train-of-Four twitch after appearance of first post-tetanic twitch, on both monitors

  2. Non-inferiority of median nerve neuromuscular monitoring compared to ulnar nerve neuromuscular monitoring - second train of four

    Time frame: Change in time between administration of rocuronium at beginning of surgery and the appearance of the first instance of 2 Train-of-Four twitches on a monitor, typically 30 minutes after appearance of first train-of-four twitch

    Time from rocuronium administration to the patient having 2 Train-of-Four twitches after appearance of first Train-of-Four twitch, on both monitors

  3. Non-inferiority of median nerve neuromuscular monitoring compared to ulnar nerve neuromuscular monitoring - reversal

    Time frame: Change in time between administration of sugammadex at end of surgery and the appearance of a Train-of-Four ratio greater than or equal to 0.9 on a monitor, typically 5 minutes after sugammadex administration

    Time from reversal at 2 or more Train-of-Four twitches with sugammadex administration to the patient having a Train-of-Four ratio greater than or equal to 0.9, or 90 percent, on both monitors

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Melissa D McCabe, MD, MSCR

CONTACT

[email protected]

909 558 4475 ext. 44475

Michael Benggon, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

909 558 4475 ext. 44475

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 14, 2024
Registry last updated
Jan 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.