Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07032025

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Research Objective:

To prospectively compare the efficacy and safety of a pre-collaboratively developed ultra-thin PTFE minimally invasive thrombectomy system versus standard pharmacological therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), both administered on top of standard care.

Research Content:

Patients meeting all the following criteria will be enrolled:

Aged 18-75 years (male or female)

Clinically diagnosed with acute PE

Right ventricular/left ventricular diameter ratio (RV/LV) ≥0.9 on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)

Provision of voluntary written informed consent.

Study Design:

After confirming eligibility, subjects will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio into two groups:

Innovative Device Group: Minimally invasive thrombectomy

Standard Pharmacological Therapy Group: Pharmacological thrombolysis + anticoagulation

Study Endpoints:

Primary Efficacy Endpoint:

Reduction in RV/LV ratio (measured by CTPA) from baseline to 48 hours post-treatment.

Primary Safety Endpoint:

Incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) from baseline to 48 hours post-treatment, defined as:

Procedure-related death

Major bleeding (per VARC-2 criteria: life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding)

Treatment-related clinical deterioration, including:

Unplanned mechanical ventilation

Arterial hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for >1 hour or requiring vasopressors) or shock

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Sustained deterioration in oxygenation

Emergency surgical embolectomy.

Key Terminology Notes:

RV/LV: Right Ventricular/Left Ventricular diameter ratio (standard medical abbreviation retained).

VARC-2: Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (internationally recognized bleeding criteria).

PTFE: Polytetrafluoroethylene (material name preserved).

MAE: Major Adverse Events (acronym defined at first use).

Clinical deterioration: Explicitly specified with objective clinical indicators.

This translation maintains scientific precision while adhering to international clinical trial reporting standards (ICH-GCP). The structure aligns with typical English-language study protocols for clarity and reproducibility.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Early Phase 1

About this study

  • Research Objective To prospectively evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of a novel ultra-thin polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) minimally invasive thrombectomy system versus guideline-directed pharmacological thrombolysis in patients with acute intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), both administered as adjuncts to standard anticoagulation therapy.
  • Study Population

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18-75 years (all genders)

Acute PE confirmed by computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) within 14 days of symptom onset

Right ventricular dysfunction defined as RV/LV diameter ratio ≥0.9 on baseline CTPA

Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Absolute contraindications to thrombolysis (e.g., active bleeding, recent intracranial hemorrhage, major surgery within 14 days)

Hemodynamic instability requiring immediate rescue therapy (systolic BP <90 mmHg with end-organ hypoperfusion)

Severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m²) or hepatic failure (Child-Pugh Class C)

Life expectancy <6 months due to non-PE comorbidities

  • Study Design Design: Prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial with blinded endpoint adjudication

Randomization: Eligible subjects stratified by PE severity (RV/LV: 0.9-1.0 vs. >1.0) and thrombus burden (main/lobar vs. segmental PA involvement), then randomized 1:1 via centralized web-based system.

Intervention Groups:

Group A (Innovative Device):

Ultra-thin PTFE thrombectomy catheter deployed under fluoroscopic guidance via femoral access

Procedure completion within 90 minutes; mandatory peri-procedural unfractionated heparin (target ACT 250-300 s)

Post-procedure: Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID → transitioned to rivaroxaban 20 mg OD at 24 hours

Group B (Standard Therapy):

Alteplase infusion: 10 mg bolus + 90 mg over 2 hours (max 100 mg)

Concurrent heparin infusion (target aPTT 60-80 s) → switched to rivaroxaban 15 mg BID (Day 1-21) → 20 mg OD thereafter

  • Endpoint Definitions Primary Efficacy Endpoint Absolute reduction in RV/LV ratio from baseline to 48 hours post-intervention, measured by blinded core-lab CTPA analysis.

Primary Safety Endpoint

Composite Major Adverse Events (MAEs) within 48 hours, including:

Procedure-related mortality

Major bleeding per VARC-2 criteria:

Fatal bleeding

Intracranial hemorrhage

Bleeding causing ≥3 g/dL hemoglobin drop or transfusion of ≥2 units

Bleeding requiring surgical intervention

Treatment-related clinical deterioration:

Unplanned mechanical ventilation

Sustained hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg for >1 hour requiring vasopressors)

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

New requirement for ECMO or emergency surgical embolectomy

  • Statistical Analysis Plan

Sample Size: 142 subjects/group (total N=284) providing 90% power (α=0.05) to detect:

Efficacy: Mean RV/LR reduction difference of 0.15 (SD=0.3)

Safety: 40% relative risk reduction in MAEs (Group A: 10% vs. Group B: 17%)

Analysis Sets:

Primary analysis: Modified intention-to-treat (mITT; all randomized receiving ≥1 treatment component)

Safety analysis: As-treated population

Methods:

Continuous variables: Mixed-effects repeated measures ANOVA

Categorical variables: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification adjustment

Time-to-event: Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test

  • Quality Assurance Endpoint Adjudication Committee: Blinded to treatment allocation

Data Monitoring: Independent DSMB reviewing unblinded safety data quarterly

Procedure Standardization:

All interventionalists certified via simulation training (≥5 proctored cases)

Centralized core lab for CTPA RV/LV measurements

Ethical Compliance: Approved by institutional review boards at all sites (NCT# pending). Trial conducted per Declaration of Helsinki.

Key Advantages of Expanded Protocol Stratified randomization controls confounding from baseline RV strain heterogeneity.

VARC-2 bleeding criteria enhance comparability with cardiovascular intervention trials.

Core-lab blinded CTPA analysis eliminates measurement bias in efficacy assessment.

Pre-specified safety triggers (e.g., Hb drop thresholds) enable objective MAE classification.

Standardized anticoagulation bridging minimizes post-procedural thrombotic risk variability.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-75 years (male or female)
  • Clinically diagnosed with acute PE
  • Right ventricular/left ventricular diameter ratio (RV/LV) ≥0.9 on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)
  • Provision of voluntary written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Target vessel diameter <6 mm
  • Calcification, plaque, or stenosis in target lesion
  • Sustained systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for >15 minutes or requiring vasopressors to maintain SBP ≥90 mmHg
  • Peak pulmonary artery pressure >70 mmHg
  • Hematocrit <28%
  • History of chronic pulmonary hypertension
  • Pre-existing left bundle branch block
  • Chronic left heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30%
  • Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine >1.8 mg/dL or >159 μmol/L)
  • Known coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis:

Platelet count <50×10⁹/L, or International Normalized Ratio (INR) >3

  • Contraindications to antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy
  • Cardiothoracic or pulmonary surgery within 7 days prior
  • Intracardiac thrombus
  • Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  • Known hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media
  • Significant comorbidities complicating treatment/evaluation:

Active malignancy Acute infectious disease/sepsis Systemic conditions precluding procedure tolerance Life expectancy <1 year

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Concurrent participation in other drug/device trials
  • Other investigator-determined unsuitability

Treatment and study plan

Innovative Device Group

Procedure

Catheter-based thrombectomy is performed within 4 hours after baseline CTPA acquisition. Pre-procedural anticoagulation with either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) is administered prior to thrombectomy. Post-procedural oral anticoagulation is transitioned to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (QD).

Standard Pharmacological Therapy Group

Drug

Following thrombolytic agent administration, anticoagulation with rivaroxaban is initiated and maintained at 15 mg twice daily (BID) for the initial 3 weeks, then switched to 20 mg once daily (QD) thereafter.

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Efficacy Endpoint

    Time frame: 48 hours post-treatment.

    Reduction in RV/LV ratio (measured by CTPA) from baseline to 48 hours post-treatment.

  2. Primary Safety Endpoint:

    Time frame: 48 hours post-treatment

    Incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) from baseline to 48 hours post-treatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

RenJi Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of the Catheter-directed Mechanical Thrombectomy Compared to Standard Anticoagulation for Use in the Treatment of Acute Intermediate-risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 22, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.