Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07506291

HOME-PE2 : Home Treatment Versus Hospitalization in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism, no Clinical Severity Criteria, and Either Right Ventricular Dysfunction or Elevated Troponin: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study (HOME-PE2) is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing home treatment versus hospitalization in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who have no clinical severity criteria according to the Hestia rule but present either right ventricular dysfunction or elevated cardiac troponin levels.

While outpatient management is considered safe for low-risk PE patients, the optimal management of patients without clinical severity but with signs of right ventricular strain or myocardial injury remains uncertain, and current guidelines are inconsistent. As a result, most of these patients are still hospitalized despite limited evidence supporting this approach.

The primary objective is to assess whether home treatment is non-inferior to hospitalization in terms of safety, defined by the 7-day rate of adverse events according to the EARTH consensus. Secondary objectives include evaluation of net clinical benefit, quality of life, functional status, and healthcare resource utilization, as well as exploration of sex-related differences and cost-effectiveness.

A total of 568 adult patients with confirmed PE will be randomized (1:1) to either home treatment with early discharge or standard hospitalization. Patients will be followed for 90 days.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Angers University Hospital, Emergency Department, Angers, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PE is a common and potentially life-threatening condition with a wide spectrum of clinical severity. In recent years, outpatient management has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in selected low-risk patients, particularly those without hemodynamic instability or significant comorbidities. Risk stratification tools such as the Hestia rule are widely used to identify patients eligible for home treatment based on clinical criteria.

However, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal management of patients who, despite having no clinical severity criteria according to the Hestia rule, present signs of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) on imaging or elevated cardiac troponin levels. These markers are associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in some populations and are used in certain guidelines to classify patients as intermediate risk, often leading to hospitalization. In contrast, other recommendations do not require systematic cardiac assessment in clinically stable patients and support outpatient care in the absence of clinical severity criteria. As a result, clinical practice remains heterogeneous, and hospitalization is still frequently preferred in this subgroup despite limited prospective evidence.

The HOME-PE2 study is designed to address this gap by comparing two commonly used management strategies-home treatment and hospitalization-in this specific population. The trial aims to determine whether outpatient management is non-inferior to hospitalization in terms of short-term safety, while also evaluating broader patient-centered and health system outcomes.

HOME-PE2 is an international, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial with blinded adjudication of clinical outcomes. Eligible adult patients presenting to the emergency department with objectively confirmed acute PE will be assessed for clinical severity using the Hestia rule. Patients without clinical criteria requiring hospitalization but with either RVD on imaging or elevated cardiac troponin levels will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either home treatment or hospitalization. Randomization will be stratified by country and by the qualifying cardiac abnormality.

Patients allocated to the home treatment group will be discharged early after inclusion, according to predefined timelines consistent with outpatient management. Patients assigned to the hospitalization group will receive standard inpatient care according to local practice. In both groups, anticoagulant therapy will be initiated and managed according to current guidelines and local protocols.

The study incorporates pragmatic features, including the comparison of usual care management strategies and flexibility in anticoagulation treatment according to local practice, thereby enhancing the generalizability of the findings to real-world clinical settings.

All patients will receive structured follow-up over a 90-day period. Clinical follow-up will include scheduled assessments shortly after inclusion and at later time points, either through in-person visits aligned with routine care or via telephone contact. In addition, patient-reported outcomes will be collected longitudinally using validated instruments assessing health-related quality of life and functional status. Data on healthcare utilization, including hospital readmissions and length of stay, will also be collected.

An independent clinical events committee, blinded to treatment allocation, will adjudicate all suspected outcome events based on predefined criteria to ensure consistency and reliability of endpoint assessment.

Beyond safety, the study will evaluate the overall net clinical benefit of home treatment compared with hospitalization, integrating multiple clinically relevant outcomes in a hierarchical framework. It will also assess the impact of management strategy on patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life and functional recovery, as well as healthcare resource use.

In addition, exploratory analyses will examine the influence of sex and living conditions on outcomes, in order to better understand potential differences in the feasibility and impact of outpatient care. A health-economic evaluation will be conducted to compare cost-utility and to estimate the potential budget impact of implementing outpatient management strategies in this population.

By rigorously comparing home treatment and hospitalization in patients with acute PE without clinical severity but with cardiac involvement, the HOME-PE2 trial aims to generate high-quality evidence to inform clinical guidelines, improve patient-centered care, and optimize the use of healthcare resources.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presentation to the Emergency Department or unscheduled consultation in one of the participating centers
  • Symptomatic PE objectively confirmed according to the European Society of Cardiology criteria 4 (either by i) a high-probability ventilation/perfusion lung scan, ii) a new contrast filling defect on spiral computed tomography, or iii) a new documentation by ultrasonography of a proximal DVT, i.e., thrombus in the popliteal vein or above, along with clinical signs of PE. All radiological tests used to diagnose PE will be interpreted by on-site radiologists or angiologists)
  • No clinical criteria mandating hospitalization according to the Hestia rule, i.e., negative Hestia rule
  • Right ventricular dysfunction - defined as a right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) diameter ratio > 1.0 on echocardiography (apical four-chamber or subcostal four-chamber view) or on CTPA (transverse plane) OR High-sensibility cardiac troponin I or T concentration above the upper limit of local normal value
  • Insurance cover according to local legislation
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Signed free informed consent (or oral consent if possible according to local regulation).

Exclusion criteria

  • Shock or hypotension (defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or a systolic pressure drop by ≥40 mmHg, for >15 minutes, if not caused by new-onset arrhythmia, hypovolemia, or sepsis)
  • Combined right ventricular dysfunction (RV/LV > 1.0 on imaging) AND troponin concentration above the upper limit of local normal value
  • Free floating thrombi in the right atrium or ventricle, if identified by routine echocardiography or CTPA
  • Active cancer other than basal or squamous-cell skin cancer defined at least with one of the following: i) cancer diagnosed within the last 6 months, ii) current anti-cancer treatment or during the 6 months before enrollment, iii) locally advanced or metastatic cancer
  • PE diagnosis established since more than 24 hours
  • 48 hours or more elapsed between ED presentation and potential inclusion or other reason making home discharge impossible within the 48 hours since ED presentation
  • Limited life expectancy or any other reason making 3-month follow-up impossible
  • Pregnant or parturient patient
  • Patient in detention by judicial or administrative decision, under a legal protection measure or undergoing compulsory psychiatric treatment

Treatment and study plan

Home treatment

Other

Outpatient management strategy for acute pulmonary embolism, including early discharge after diagnosis and initiation of anticoagulation therapy, with follow-up according to current guidelines and local practice.

Hospitalization

Other

Inpatient management strategy for acute pulmonary embolism, including hospital admission and standard care with anticoagulation therapy according to current guidelines and local practice.

Primary outcomes

  1. 7-day composite incidence of adverse events (EARTH criteria)

    Time frame: Within 7 days following randomization

    Composite outcome defined according to the EARTH consensus, including the occurrence of any of the following events within 7 days after randomization: death possibly or confirmed to be related to pulmonary embolism (including death of undetermined cause), hemodynamic failure, respiratory failure, cardiac rhythm disorders requiring urgent treatment, major bleeding (according to ISTH definition), or recurrent venous thromboembolism (symptomatic pulmonary embolism or proximal deep vein thrombosis requiring treatment or modification of anticoagulation). All outcome events are adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee blinded to treatment allocation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Net benefit at 7 days (hierarchical composite outcome)

    Time frame: Within 7 days following randomization

    Hierarchical composite outcome assessed using a win-ratio approach, including the following components in order of priority: death possibly or confirmed to be related to pulmonary embolism (including death of undetermined cause), hemodynamic failure, respiratory failure, cardiac rhythm disorders requiring urgent treatment, major bleeding (ISTH definition), recurrent venous thromboembolism (symptomatic pulmonary embolism or proximal deep vein thrombosis requiring treatment or modification of anticoagulation), non-major clinically relevant bleeding, unscheduled hospital presentations (all causes), and cumulative length of hospital stay.

  2. Global health quality-of-life (short term)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 3, Day 7

    Change over time in health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

  3. Functional status (short term)

    Time frame: Pre-pulmonary embolism status estimated at inclusion, Day 0, Day 3, and Day 7

    Change over time in patient-reported functional status assessed using the Post-VTE Functional Status (PVFS) scale.

  4. Composite incidence of major adverse events

    Time frame: Within 14 days, 30 days, and 90 days following randomization

    Composite of all cause-death, recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding

  5. Individual components of safety outcomes

    Time frame: Within 14 days, 30 days, and 90 days following randomization

    Incidence of all cause-death, recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, non-major clinically relevant bleeding, pulmonary embolism -related mortality and fatal bleeding.

  6. Health-related quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Days 3, 7, 14, 30, and 90

    Longitudinal assessment of EQ-5D-5L scores over 90 days

  7. Functional status

    Time frame: Pre-pulmonary embolism status estimated at inclusion, Day 0 and Days 3, 7, 14, 30 and 90

    Longitudinal assessment of the Post-VTE Functional Status (PVFS) over 90 days

  8. Hospital resources utilization

    Time frame: Within 14 days, 30 days, and 90 days following inclusion

    Number of unscheduled hospital presentations and cumulative lenght of in-hospital stay

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Matthieu LE LAY

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 (0)2 41 35 58 91

Pierre-Marie ROY, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+ 33 (0)2 41 35 37 18

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Angers

Other Gov

Registry information

Acronym: HOME-PE2

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Apr 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.