Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02363231

Maximal Inspiratory Pressure at Extubation: Relationship With Mortality

The process of weaning from mechanical ventilation was decided after clinical judgment and weaning predictive index. Nevertheless, indexes predicting weaning outcome like Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) are frequently inaccurate. However the long-term involvement of respiratory muscles in critically ill patients has not been established. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship on MIP at extubation on one-year mortality in critically ill patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Le Havre, Jacques Monod Hospital

Montivilliers, 76290, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mechanical ventilation at least at 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

  • Delirium
  • Cognitive dysfunction
  • refusal to participate

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Time frame: One year after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to mechanical ventilation weaning

    Time frame: During Intensive care unit hospitalization

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Feb 13, 2015
Registry last updated
Jan 12, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.