the Regional Research Clinic, School of Dentistry at the University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98025, United States
NCT Number: NCT03272828
The purpose of the study is to compare two different types of dental implants which will be used to support/retain a removable denture in the edentulous mandible. Subjects will have one implant placed in the midline of the mandible after which the patient's existing denture will be modified to fit the implant. The population of this study consists of healthy edentulous individuals 20-75 years of age who have complete dentures in the upper and lower arch.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98025, United States
Titanium dental implants have been frequently used in the rehabilitation of edentulous patients. Implants may provide adequate denture stability, improve oral function and oral health related quality of life. There is evidence that implants supporting fixed and removable prostheses have excellent long term success rates. Factors such as implant surface characteristics, length, diameter and shape (parallel sided or tapered) may play and important role for the outcome of the treatment especially when the immediate loading protocol (loading of the implant the same day it is surgically placed) is utilized. There are reports indicating that dental implants placed according to the immediate loading protocol can be used to support removable prostheses in the mandible. Such protocol would minimize the number of surgical procedures and significantly shorten the overall treatment time. Further, increased oral health related quality of life has been reported from studies on mandibular implant overdentures. Traditionally two implants have been suggested for the support of a mandibular overdenture. However, high patient satisfaction rates and appropriate denture retention have been reported among patients with a single implant placed in the mid-line. It is also important to further evaluate and compare various implant designs to determine clinical outcomes. The two dominating types of implant body design on the market are the parallel-sided (straight) and the tapered (conical) shaped. Both implants have similar threads, and the surgical procedure for placing the implants in the bone tissue is similar, but the drills used have a slightly different design and shape. There are today no randomized controlled studies evaluating differences in outcomes with respect to the external implant design i.e. parallel sided or tapered.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: From implant placement (baseline) to 5 years
Implant failure defined as an implant that has lost osseointegration and no longer is stable and supported by the surrounding bone (no bone to implant contact).
Time frame: 5 years
The implant stability quotient (ISQ) value is a measurement of the mechanical implant stability in the bone and is measured directly after surgical implant placement and then at follow-ups. It is obtained by resonance frequency with a device that sends out a signal to a metal rod placed in the implant and then reads the value of the signal when it bounces back. The value ranges from 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better bone-to-implant contact and greater stability.
Time frame: From implant placement (baseline) to 5 years
The measure of bone loss in millimeters (mm) around the implant at 5 years compared to bone height at baseline. Changes in bone level are measured on intraoral radiographs and compared with the bone level measure immediately after surgical implant placement (baseline). The implant platform was used as the reference point and measurements of the bone were made to the nearest thread. The bone level is measured on both sides (mesial & distal) of the implant using the thread on the implant as reference. The distance between the threads is 0.6 mm.
University of Washington
Other
A Prospective Randomized Study on the Immediate Loading of Mandibular Overdentures Supported by Parallel Sided or Tapered Dental Titanium Implants
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07346391
Dental Implants
HỒ CHÍ MINH, VIỆT NAM, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT05722041
Dental Implants, Immediate Dental Implant Placement
Alicante, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07671456
Aggressive Periodontitis, Chronic Disease
View Trial DetailsNCT07608523
Dental Implants, Gingival Diseases
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details