University of Petra
Amman, 11196, Jordan
NCT Number: NCT07511530
This study evaluates the effectiveness of Scigates foam mouth sanitizer 2 in 1 toothpaste and mouthwash in reducing tooth sensitivity and improving tooth whitening compared to Lacalut® White & Repair toothpaste. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Scigates group or the Lacalut control group and will use the assigned product three times daily for 8 weeks. Tooth sensitivity and dental staining will be assessed at multiple time points using standardized clinical scales. Safety will also be monitored throughout the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Amman, 11196, Jordan
This study is a randomized, parallel-group, controlled post-marketing clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Scigates foam mouth sanitizer 2 in 1 toothpaste and mouthwash compared to Lacalut® White & Repair toothpaste in reducing tooth sensitivity and improving tooth whitening.
Healthy adult participants aged 18 to 65 years with mild to moderate tooth staining and self-reported tooth sensitivity were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the test group, receiving Scigates foam mouth sanitizer 2 in 1 toothpaste and mouthwash, or the control group, receiving Lacalut® White & Repair toothpaste. Participants used the assigned product three times daily for a period of 8 weeks according to standardized instructions.
A total of 57 participants were enrolled. The study was conducted as an exploratory post-marketing investigation and was concluded at this sample size to provide preliminary estimates of treatment effects, variability, and feasibility, which may inform the design and statistical powering of future larger-scale confirmatory studies.
Efficacy was assessed using validated clinical measures. Tooth sensitivity was evaluated using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale, and dental extrinsic staining was assessed using the Modified Lobene Stain Index. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 to monitor changes over time.
Safety was evaluated throughout the study by recording adverse events and conducting clinical assessments. Participants were instructed to avoid the use of other dental treatments during the study period unless approved by the investigator.
Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods, including parametric and non-parametric tests, with an intention-to-treat approach. The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will use Scigates foam mouth sanitizer 2 in 1 toothpaste and mouthwash three times daily for 8 weeks by applying the product directly to the toothbrush and brushing for 2-3 minutes according to standardized instructions.
Participants will use Lacalut® White and Repair toothpaste three times daily for 8 weeks by applying the product directly to the toothbrush and brushing for 2-3 minutes according to standardized instructions.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 8
Tooth sensitivity will be assessed using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale. This is a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 3, where:
0 = No response to air stimulus (best outcome)
Interpretation: Lower scores indicate less tooth sensitivity (better outcome), while higher scores indicate greater sensitivity (worse outcome).
Assessments will be performed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 8.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 8
Dental extrinsic staining will be assessed using the Modified Lobene Stain Index (MLSI). This index evaluates both extent and intensity of staining, each scored on a scale from 0 to 3:
Extent of Staining (0-3):
0 = No stain
Intensity of Staining (0-3):
0 = No stain
Scores from extent and intensity (for specified teeth) are summed to generate a composite score, with a possible range from 0 to 12.
Interpretation: Lower scores indicate less staining (better outcome), while higher scores indicate more severe staining (worse outcome).
Stain assessment will be performed on the labial surface of the upper left central incisor and upper left canine (or right counterparts if needed) at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 8.
Prof. Mayyas Al-Remawi
Other
Post Marketing Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Scigates Foam Mouth Sanitizer 2 in 1 Toothpaste and Mouthwash in Tooth Whitening and Treating Tooth Sensitivity in a Control Group Using Standardized Methods and Criteria
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07669818
Dentin Hypersensitivity, Dentin Sensitivity
Cairo, Other, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07669324
Dentin Hypersensitivity, Dentin Sensitivity
Banī Suwayf, Beni Suweif Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07593508
Dental Pulp Diseases, Dental Pulp Exposure
Huế, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT07297732
Dentin Hypersensitivity, Dentin Sensitivity
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial Details