University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT04092153
This study evaluates outcomes of robotic-arm assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty [MA TKA] versus robotic-arm assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty [FA TKA]. Half the study will receive MA TKA and half will receive FA TKA.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
Total knee arthroplasty [TKA] is an estabilshed treatment for symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis, but there is a higher disatisfaction rate when compared to total hip arthroplasty. The exact aetiology of this is not clear but recent studies have shown one possible reason to be conventional TKA with mechanical alignment [MA] may force the knee into an unnatural position. This may lead to altered knee anatomy and kinematics that may compromise patient satisfaction.
Total knee arthroplasty using functional alignment [FA] aims to restore the patient's prearthritic knee anatomy and native joint kinematics. Early clinical and functional outcome studies have reported promising outcomes in TKA with FA but results of longer term studies have not yet been published.
There are very few prospective studies exploring clinical and radiological outcomes in MA versus FA for TKA. It is possible to improve on previous studies by recording a more comprehensive range of clinical and functional outcome measures, blinding patients and observers recording outcomes of interest, and using longer follow-up times.
Robotic-arm assistance can be used to improve the accuracy of implant positioning. Clinical and functional outcomes should also be correlated to longer-term outcomes to better establish the "safe zone" for functional alignment. The findings of this study will enable an improved understanding of the clinical and functional benefits of FA compared to MA. These outcomes will improve our understanding of the optimal TKA alignment with possible improved outcomes; improved cost-effectiveness by reduced revisions and better patient satisfaction and function; and improved long-term implant survival.
100 patients will be enrolled in a 1:1 ratio between the two treatment groups. Trial patient will be allocated to either the MA TKA ['Control group'] or to the FA TKA ['Investigation group']. Outcomes will be recorded at specific milestones.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgical implantation of prosthetic knee using robotic-arm assist
Time frame: 2 years post-intervention
Patient recorded outcome questionnaire evaluating pain, stiffness and disability in affected joint
Time frame: pre op and 6 weeks post op
Assessed using Computerised Tomography (CT) scanogram. Measurements of the hip-knee-angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), femoral flexion angle, and posterior tibial slope will be recorded preoperatively and postoperatively
Time frame: interoperative
Operating time [minutes]
Time frame: Documented when participant leaves hospital, an average of 72 -96 hours
Time to discharge from admission until documented discharge from hospital (hours)
Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op
Patient recorded outcome measure via questionnaire. Score cumulative with -100 being best score and 0 being worst score
Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op
Patient recorded outcome measure via questionnaire. 48 is best score and 0 worst score
Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op
Patient recorded outcome measure. Questions concerning attitudes to physical and mental heath with 12 questions combined to give overall norm-based values; higher score better, lower score worse.
Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op
Patient recorded outcome measure via questionnaire. 6 separate domains including pain, stiffness, quality of life, symptoms, and function; each domain creates percentage with overall cumulative percentage achieved; best score 100%
Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op
Patient recorded outcome measure via questionnaire. Patient records current level of activity; 10 best possible score, 0 worst possible score
Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op
Patient recorded outcome measure with 5 domains; score -1 to 1, with 1 being best score
Time frame: during inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6- weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
description of any mobility aids used to assist with ambulation; can describe wheelchair, walker, crutches, sticks or no need for any mobility aid
Time frame: during inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6- weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Mobilisation distance (metres)
Time frame: inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Range of movement (degrees) in knee joint
Time frame: postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Femoral and tibial implant early migration as assessed using RSA
Time frame: performed postoperatively at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively
Walking on an instrumented treadmill with force plates
Time frame: during inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6- weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Complications relating to surgery
University College, London
Other
A Prospective Randomised Control Trial Comparing Mako Robotic-arm Assisted Functionally Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Mako Robotic-arm Assisted Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04748510
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06032442
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT04730271
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03913442
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial Details