Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04092153

Mako Functionally Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Mako Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study evaluates outcomes of robotic-arm assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty [MA TKA] versus robotic-arm assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty [FA TKA]. Half the study will receive MA TKA and half will receive FA TKA.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom

About this study

Total knee arthroplasty [TKA] is an estabilshed treatment for symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis, but there is a higher disatisfaction rate when compared to total hip arthroplasty. The exact aetiology of this is not clear but recent studies have shown one possible reason to be conventional TKA with mechanical alignment [MA] may force the knee into an unnatural position. This may lead to altered knee anatomy and kinematics that may compromise patient satisfaction.

Total knee arthroplasty using functional alignment [FA] aims to restore the patient's prearthritic knee anatomy and native joint kinematics. Early clinical and functional outcome studies have reported promising outcomes in TKA with FA but results of longer term studies have not yet been published.

There are very few prospective studies exploring clinical and radiological outcomes in MA versus FA for TKA. It is possible to improve on previous studies by recording a more comprehensive range of clinical and functional outcome measures, blinding patients and observers recording outcomes of interest, and using longer follow-up times.

Robotic-arm assistance can be used to improve the accuracy of implant positioning. Clinical and functional outcomes should also be correlated to longer-term outcomes to better establish the "safe zone" for functional alignment. The findings of this study will enable an improved understanding of the clinical and functional benefits of FA compared to MA. These outcomes will improve our understanding of the optimal TKA alignment with possible improved outcomes; improved cost-effectiveness by reduced revisions and better patient satisfaction and function; and improved long-term implant survival.

100 patients will be enrolled in a 1:1 ratio between the two treatment groups. Trial patient will be allocated to either the MA TKA ['Control group'] or to the FA TKA ['Investigation group']. Outcomes will be recorded at specific milestones.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient has symptomatic knee osteoarthritis requiring primary TKA
  • Patient and surgeon are in agreement that TKA is the most appropriate treatment
  • Patient is fit for surgical intervention following review by surgeon and anaesthetist
  • Patient is between 18-80 years of age at time of surgery
  • Gender: male and female
  • Patient must be capable of giving informed consent and agree to comply with the postoperative review program
  • Patient must be a permanent resident in an area accessible to the study site
  • Patient must have sufficient postoperative mobility to attend follow-up clinics and allow for radiographs to be taken

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient is not suitable for routine primary TKA e.g. patient has ligament deficiency that requires a constrained prosthesis
  • Patient has bone loss that requires augmentation
  • Patient is not medically fit for surgical intervention
  • Patient requires revision surgery following previously failed correctional osteotomy or ipsilateral TKA
  • Patient is immobile or has another neurological condition affecting musculoskeletal function
  • Patient is less than 18 years of age or greater than 80 years of age
  • Patient is already enrolled on another concurrent clinical trial
  • Patient is unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent form specific to this study
  • Patient is unable to attend the follow-up programme
  • Patient is non-resident in local area or expected to leave the catchment area postoperatively

Treatment and study plan

Total knee arthroplasy

Device

Surgical implantation of prosthetic knee using robotic-arm assist

Primary outcomes

  1. Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)

    Time frame: 2 years post-intervention

    Patient recorded outcome questionnaire evaluating pain, stiffness and disability in affected joint

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lower limb alignment

    Time frame: pre op and 6 weeks post op

    Assessed using Computerised Tomography (CT) scanogram. Measurements of the hip-knee-angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), femoral flexion angle, and posterior tibial slope will be recorded preoperatively and postoperatively

  2. Operating time

    Time frame: interoperative

    Operating time [minutes]

  3. Time to discharge

    Time frame: Documented when participant leaves hospital, an average of 72 -96 hours

    Time to discharge from admission until documented discharge from hospital (hours)

  4. Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)

    Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op

    Patient recorded outcome measure via questionnaire. Score cumulative with -100 being best score and 0 being worst score

  5. Oxford Knee Score (OKS)

    Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op

    Patient recorded outcome measure via questionnaire. 48 is best score and 0 worst score

  6. Short form health survey of 12 items (SF-12),

    Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op

    Patient recorded outcome measure. Questions concerning attitudes to physical and mental heath with 12 questions combined to give overall norm-based values; higher score better, lower score worse.

  7. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)

    Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op

    Patient recorded outcome measure via questionnaire. 6 separate domains including pain, stiffness, quality of life, symptoms, and function; each domain creates percentage with overall cumulative percentage achieved; best score 100%

  8. University of California at Los Angeles knee (UCLA)

    Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op

    Patient recorded outcome measure via questionnaire. Patient records current level of activity; 10 best possible score, 0 worst possible score

  9. European Quality of Life questionnaire with 5 dimensions for adults (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op

    Patient recorded outcome measure with 5 domains; score -1 to 1, with 1 being best score

  10. Use of mobility aids

    Time frame: during inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6- weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

    description of any mobility aids used to assist with ambulation; can describe wheelchair, walker, crutches, sticks or no need for any mobility aid

  11. Mobilisation distance

    Time frame: during inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6- weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

    Mobilisation distance (metres)

  12. Range of movement

    Time frame: inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

    Range of movement (degrees) in knee joint

  13. radiosteriometric analysis (RSA)

    Time frame: postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

    Femoral and tibial implant early migration as assessed using RSA

  14. Gait analysis

    Time frame: performed postoperatively at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively

    Walking on an instrumented treadmill with force plates

  15. Complications

    Time frame: during inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6- weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

    Complications relating to surgery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University College, London

Other

Collaborators

  • Stryker Orthopaedics

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Randomised Control Trial Comparing Mako Robotic-arm Assisted Functionally Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Mako Robotic-arm Assisted Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 17, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 9, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.