total-body irradiation
RadiationRadiation
Other names: TBI
NCT Number: NCT00322101
RATIONALE: Giving chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide, and total-body radiation therapy before a donor peripheral stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. It is not yet known whether low-dose chemotherapy and total-body radiation therapy is more effective than high-dose chemotherapy in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia.
PURPOSE: This phase III trial is studying low-dose conditioning to see how well it works compared to high-dose conditioning followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplant in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine whether the conditioning intensity affects outcomes after HCT in patients with MDS or AML who have < 5% marrow myeloblasts at the time of HCT.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I (Nonmyeloablative regimen):
CONDITIONING: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV on days -4 to -2 and undergo low-dose total-body irradiation on day 0.
TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion on day 0.
GRAFT-VS-HOST DISEASE PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive cyclosporine every 12 hours on days -3 to 57 with taper on days 57-177 or cyclosporine every 12 hours on days -3 to 100 with taper on days 101-177. Patients also receive oral mycophenolate mofetil every 12 hours on days 0-27 or every 8 hours on days 0-40 with taper on days 41-96.
Arm II (Myeloablative regimen):
CONDITIONING: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups.
Group A: Patients receive fludarabine IV once daily and oral busulfan four times daily or busulfan IV over 3 hours on days -5 to -2.
Group B: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours on days -3 and -2 and oral busulfan four times daily or busulfan IV over 3 hours on days -7 to -4.
TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo PBSC infusion on day 0.
GRAFT-VS-HOST DISEASE PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV continuously or orally every 12 hours on days -1 to 56 and taper on days 57-200. Patients also receive methotrexate IV on days 1, 3, 6, and 11.
Treatment in both arms continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Radiation
Other names: TBI
Undergo allogeneic transplantation
Given IV
Other names: CPM, CTX, Cytoxan, Endoxan, Endoxana
Given orally
Other names: Cellcept, MMF
Given IV or orally
Other names: BSF, BU, Misulfan, Mitosan, Myeloleukon
Given IV or orally
Other names: ciclosporin, cyclosporin, cyclosporin A, CYSP, Sandimmune
Given IV
Other names: 2-F-ara-AMP, Beneflur, Fludara
Undergo transplantation
Other names: PBPC transplantation, PBSC transplantation, peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation, transplantation, peripheral blood stem cell
Undergo allogeneic transplantation
Correlative studies
Correlative studies
Correlative studies
Correlative studies
Other names: fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
Correlative studies
Other names: pharmacological studies
Correlative studies
Given IV or orally
Other names: FK 506, Prograf
Given IV
Other names: amethopterin, Folex, methylaminopterin, Mexate, MTX
Time frame: At 2 years
Time frame: After stem cell infusion to date of last follow up.
IWG criteria was used to determine disease progression
Time frame: At 100 days
Time frame: After stem cell infusion to day 28
Chimerism analysis was performed in patients who recieved nonmyeloablative tranplsnat. In this group the definition of engraftment was a CD3 count greater than 50%. In the myeloablative group, engraftment was defined as an absolute neutrophil count greater than 50%.
Time frame: After stem cell infusion to date of last follow up.
Disease progression/relapse was defined by IWG criteria
Time frame: After transplantation
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Other
A Multi-center Phase III Study Comparing Myeloablative to Nonmyeloablative Transplant Conditioning in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00856388
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Multilineage Dysplasia Following Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01093586
Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Multilineage Dysplasia Following Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00890747
AIDS-related Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma, AIDS-related Diffuse Mixed Cell Lymphoma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00343798
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Multilineage Dysplasia Following Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details