The University of Texas Health Science Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900, United States
NCT Number: NCT00223379
This protocol is for a clinical trial evaluating the clinical success of root canal therapy performed on teeth with chronic apical periodontitis of pulpal origin with either large or small apical root canal preparation techniques.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900, United States
This randomized clinical trial will compare the clinical success of two commonly used techniques for performing non-surgical endodontic procedures on teeth with chronic apical periodontitis of pulpal origin. The first method, termed the "GT method" uses a commercially available rotary file system to instrument the root canal systems from the crown to the apical portion of the root. After completion of this technique, the apical portion of the root is prepared to the same standardized ISO size #20 in all roots (i.e., 0.2 mm cross-sectional diameter). The second method, termed the "Lightspeed method" uses a different commercially available rotary file system to shape the root canal systems from the apical to the crown portion of the root. After completion of this technique, the apical preparation is often larger in cross-sectional diameter than that observed after the GT method; however, an equally important distinction is that the Lightspeed method customizes the final cross-sectional diameter for each root canal system, and thus each root has a similar enlargement of apical preparation size due to proportionate removal of infected dentin at the end of the root. Although the Lightspeed method may result in reduced bacteria in the apical portion of root canal systems, there is no evidence to date that this effect improves clinical success rates. This study will test the hypothesis that the larger apical preparation size produced by the Lightspeed instrumentation system will produce a higher percentage of clinically successful treatments of teeth with apical periodontitis (AP) as compared to the GT method
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparison of two commonly used techniques for performing root canal treatment: 1) Lightspeed method 2)Buchannan method
Time frame: 2 year
Time frame: 2 years
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06833515
Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin, Mouth Diseases
Karaköprü, Şanlıurfa, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT00223470
Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin, Neurologic Manifestations
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06587048
Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin, Periapical Lesions
Rohtak, Haryana, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06643676
Bone Cysts, Cysts
Rohtak, Haryana, India
View Trial Details