Phoebe Rich, MD
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
NCT Number: NCT00446043
This was a multi-center, open-label, non-comparative study that evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy profile of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Gel.
Subjects were evaluated at Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
Safety was evaluated by spontaneous reports of Adverse Events (AEs), the Local Tolerability Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, and Stinging/Burning), routine laboratory testing (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis), and monitoring of suspected sensitizations. Efficacy was evaluated by analysis of Percent Change from Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts, and by the Subject's Assessment of Acne.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Adapalene 0.1 percent (%) [weight by weight (W/W)] and benzoyl peroxide 2.5 % (W/W) gel topically daily in the evening.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 LOCF
Percent change in inflammatory, noninflammatory and total lesions at Month 12 was measured from baseline lesions. The noninflammatory lesion count was the sum of open comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind an open follicular orifice (blackhead) and closed comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind a closed follicular orifice (whitehead). The inflammatory lesion count was the sum of papules (a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter) and pustules (a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate). The total lesion count was the sum of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. Missing adapalene and benzoyl peroxide data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Time frame: At Month 6
Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse.
Time frame: At Month 12
Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Local tolerability assessment for erythema (abnormal redness of the skin) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no erythema), mild (1- slight pinkness present), moderate (2- definite redness, easily recognized), severe (3- intense redness). The worst severity scores were generally mild or moderate, and rarely severe.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Local tolerability assessment for scaling (abnormal shedding of the stratum corneum) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follow; none (0- no Scaling), mild (1- barely perceptible shedding, noticeable only on light scratching or rubbing), moderate (2- obvious but not profuse shedding), severe (3- heavy scale production).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Local tolerability assessment for dryness (brittle and/or tight sensation) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no dryness), mild (1- slight but definite roughness), moderate (2 -moderate roughness), severe (3- marked roughness).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Local tolerability assessment for stinging/burning [prickling pain sensation immediately after (within 5 minutes of) dosing] was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no stinging/ burning), mild (1- slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation; not really bothersome), moderate (2- definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat), severe (3- hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort).
Time frame: Baseline up to Month 14
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Time frame: Baseline up to Month 14
Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported.
Galderma R&D
Industry
A Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of a Fixed Combination of Adapalene 0.1% and Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% (Adapalene and Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Gel) Gel in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05080764
Acne Vulgaris, Acneiform Eruptions
Fountain Valley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07652112
Acne Vulgaris, Acneiform Eruptions
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06415279
Acne Vulgaris, Acneiform Eruptions
High Point, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07244887
Acne Vulgaris, Acneiform Eruptions
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details