Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03663803

Live Your Life Without Diabetes

Aim: To examine the effect of a brief theory-based health promotion intervention delivered in the community on health behaviour and diabetes-related risk factors among Danish adults at high risk of diabetes.

Methods: A randomised trial was conducted among 127 individuals aged 28 to 70 with fasting plasma glucose: 6.1-6.9 mmol/l and/or HbA1c : 6.0-<6.5% (42- < 48 mmol/mol) recruited from general practice in Holstebro, Denmark. Participants were randomised to a control group or to receive the intervention delivered over four 2 h group sessions during five weeks, and two further sessions after one and six months. Questionnaire data and clinical measures were collected at baseline, three months and one year after intervention.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • resident in the Municipality of Holstebro
  • aged <70 years
  • a measurement of fasting plasma glucose: 6.1-6.9 mmol/l (the thresholds for Impaired Fasting Glucose according to clinical guidelines) and/or HbA1c : 6.0-<6.5% (42- <48 mmol/mol) within the previous six months.

Exclusion criteria

  • none

Treatment and study plan

Brief theory-based health promotion intervention (group-based)

Behavioral

The intervention is depicted using a PaT Plot in the published paper: Juul, L et al. Effectiveness of a brief theory-based health promotion intervention among adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes: One-year results from a randomised trial in a community setting. Primary Care Diabetes 1 0 ( 2 0 1 6 ) 111-120.

Primary outcomes

  1. weight

    Time frame: baseline to one-year follow-up

    change in weight / the proportion with weight reduction >5% of baseline weight at one-year

  2. total-fat intake <30% of energy intake

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Information on diet was obtained using a validated self-administrated 198-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), the Inter99 FFQ. Portion size was set according to gender. Daily nutrient intake was translated into energy intake and nutrient intake using the Danish Food Com- position Databank (version 7.01) and the software program FoodCalc version 1.3

  3. saturated-fat intake <10% of energy intake

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Information on diet was obtained using a validated self-administrated 198-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), the Inter99 FFQ. Portion size was set according to gender. Daily nutrient intake was translated into energy intake and nutrient intake using the Danish Food Com- position Databank (version 7.01) and the software program FoodCalc version 1.3

  4. fibre-intake ≥15g/1000kcal changes in physical activity level.

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Information on diet was obtained using a validated self-administrated 198-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), the Inter99 FFQ. Portion size was set according to gender. Daily nutrient intake was translated into energy intake and nutrient intake using the Danish Food Com- position Databank (version 7.01) and the software program FoodCalc version 1.3

  5. changes in physical activity.

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Physical activity was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Increased MET (min/week)=increased physical activity

Secondary outcomes

  1. patient activation

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    patient activation was measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM)

  2. waist circumference

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Waist circumference was recorded as the average of two measurements of waist circumference using a tape measure halfway between the lowest point of the rib cage and the anterior supe- rior iliac crests when standing.

  3. total energy intake

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Information on diet was obtained using a validated self-administrated 198-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), the Inter99 FFQ. Portion size was set according to gender. Daily nutrient intake was translated into energy intake and nutrient intake using the Danish Food Com- position Databank (version 7.01) and the software program FoodCalc version 1.3

  4. blood pressure, systolic and diastolic

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was calculated as the mean of three measurements performed after at least 10 min rest, while participants were seated with the cuff on the right arm at the level of the heart.

  5. HbA1c

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Blood tests were analysed in a central laboratory.

  6. cholesterol

    Time frame: change from baseline to one-year follow-up

    Total, LDL, HDL, Blood tests were analysed in a central laboratory.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of a Brief Theory-based Health Promotion Intervention Among Adults at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: One-year Results From a Randomised Trial in a Community Setting

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Sep 10, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 10, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.