Light Therapy and Occupational Therapy Fatigue Management-Based Intervention for Patients With Genitourinary Cancers

The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy [if any] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL).

The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy [if any] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL).

The effects of light therapy and occupational therapy (OT) on FACIT will be evaluated by comparing light therapy to no-light therapy and comparing occupational therapy to no-occupational therapy. Analysis of variance test will be used for the factorial comparisons, with a two-sided statistical significance level (alpha = 0.05). The interaction between occupational therapy and light therapy will be explored (to understand whether the effect of light therapy [if any] on FACIT would change with occupational therapy and vice versa). The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the Quality of Life (QoL).

Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL.

Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL.

Will evaluate whether the longitudinal change in FACIT-Fatigue scores, is significantly different between the intervention groups, including the control group. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT- fatigue scale) is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the better the QoL.

Will determine if an OT-based intervention can improve self-reported occupational performance from preassessment to immediately after time point 2 (session 6) This outcome measure is Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Its administration involves four steps: (a) the patient is asked to identify occupations that are difficult for him or her in self-care, productivity and leisure; (b) the importance of these problem occupations is rated on a scale of 1-10 in terms of importance (1 = least important, 10 = most important); (c) patients' perceptions of performance and satisfaction with their five most important problems are rated on two separate 10-point scales (performance 1 = not able to do it, 10 = able to do it extremely well; satisfaction 1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied) and finally (d) at reassessment both the performance and satisfaction ratings are repeated (and the change between assessment and reassessment is evaluated).

Will determine if an OT-based intervention can improve self-reported occupational performance from preassessment to immediately after time point 2 (session 6) This outcome measure is Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Its administration involves four steps: (a) the patient is asked to identify occupations that are difficult for him or her in self-care, productivity and leisure; (b) the importance of these problem occupations is rated on a scale of 1-10 in terms of importance (1 = least important, 10 = most important); (c) patients' perceptions of performance and satisfaction with their five most important problems are rated on two separate 10-point scales (performance 1 = not able to do it, 10 = able to do it extremely well; satisfaction 1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied) and finally (d) at reassessment both the performance and satisfaction ratings are repeated (and the change between assessment and reassessment is evaluated).