Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06995898

The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer

The Vanguard Study is a feasibility study to explore several aspects of evaluating multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests in a future definitive randomized controlled trial. An MCD test measures markers in the blood in order to screen for multiple cancers simultaneously. There is a need to understand how MCDs may work as cancer screening tools. The goal of cancer screening is to reduce the burden of cancer by identifying cancers before they show symptoms or signs, when treatment is likely to be most effective. In this study, adults aged 45-75 without cancer will be randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: 2 separate MCD test groups or a control group. These two MCD tests will not be compared to each other but will be compared to cancers detected in the control group. This study will provide early information on how well MCD tests perform as cancer screening tools. It will also help researchers understand how patients and their doctors make decisions about their care when the MCD test result comes back as normal (negative) or abnormal (positive).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

45 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kaiser Permanente-Division of Research, Pleasanton, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Assess the feasibility of recruitment and adherence to protocol-required baseline and follow-up data and blood collection.

II. Assess the feasibility of achieving representative enrollment across participating recruitment sites.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the impact of participant blinding on willingness to participate, adherence to protocol required baseline and follow-up data, blood collection, and rates of standard of care screening.

II. To determine the timeliness of returning test results to participants. III. To understand the factors contributing to lack of diagnostic resolution of an abnormal MCD test.

IV. To examine the effects of participant characteristics, including cancer risk factors and social determinants of health, on all aspects of feasibility.

V. To estimate the proportion of participants receiving an MCD test outside of the trial.

VI. To assess the feasibility of a staggered introduction of the second MCD assay intervention arm.

VII. To estimate the proportion of abnormal MCD tests that are diagnostically resolved, and the time to resolution.

VIII. To compare the proportion of participants who receive standard of care screening during follow-up between the intervention and control arms.

IX. To assess the accuracy of tissue of origin prediction for each MCD assay. X. To estimate the incidence of complications related to diagnostic evaluation of an abnormal MCD test result.

XI. To assess the effect of an abnormal MCD test and diagnostic workup on anxiety and cancer worry.

XII. To evaluate the clinical diagnostic performance of the MCD assays.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate rates of late-stage cancer, and the distribution of cancer stage.

II. To estimate assay-targeted cancer-specific mortality of each MCD assay, all cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality.

III. To develop preliminary estimates of the total and incremental budget impact of MCD testing compared to current screening practice from the payor perspective.

IV. To develop preliminary estimates of the economic burden and impact of MCD testing from the participant perspective.

V. To assess the willingness of participants who reported military service to describe military-related environmental exposures by completing the Military Exposure Questionnaire.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.

ARM I: Participants undergo blood collection for Shield MCD testing at enrollment and after one year on study. Participants at unblinded sites are provided results of tests and those with abnormal results follow up with their clinician for additional testing. Participants at blinded sites are provided abnormal results and will follow up with their clinician for additional testing.

ARM II: Participants undergo blood collection for Avantect MCD testing at enrollment and after one year on study. Participants at unblinded sites are provided results of tests and those with abnormal results follow up with their clinician for additional testing. Participants at blinded sites are provided abnormal results and will follow up with their clinician for additional testing.

ARM III (Control): Participants undergo blood collection at enrollment and after one year on study.

After completion of study intervention, participants are followed passively up to 10 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 45-75 years old
  • Agree to provide blood samples for possible MCD testing at enrollment and at 1 year following enrollment
  • Agree to allow collection of information from their medical records for study-related purposes
  • Understand and be able to complete informed consent and participant questionnaires in English, Spanish, or Arabic
  • Note: Eligibility for Spanish and Arabic languages are at the Hub's discretion

Exclusion criteria

  • Solid malignant tumor or blood cancer diagnosis, with or without treatment, within the last 5 years
  • Note: Persons with a history of in situ cancers (e.g., ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, cervical cancer in situ, atypical melanocytic hyperplasia or melanoma in situ) or nonmelanoma skin cancer are eligible
  • Ongoing cancer diagnostic work-up
  • Ongoing participation in another study of an investigational cancer screening test or technology
  • Currently breastfeeding or pregnant, or planning to become pregnant in the next year

Treatment and study plan

Biospecimen Collection

Procedure

Undergo blood collection

Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection

Device Usage

Device

Evaluation of MCD tests

Other names: Usage of Device

Electronic Health Record Review

Other

Obtain health data

Multi-Cancer Detection Test

Procedure

Undergo Shield MCD test

Other names: MCD Assay, MCD Test, MCED Assay, MCED Test, Multi Cancer Detection Assay, Multi Cancer Detection Test, Multi Cancer Early Detection Assay, Multi Cancer Early Detection Test, Multi-Cancer Detection Assay, Multi-Cancer Early Detection Assay, Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Study specific questionnaires

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of enrollment onto study

    Time frame: At time of randomization

    The number of participants enrolled into the study compared to trial goals.

  2. Proportion of participants who complete baseline and follow-up questionnaires within 60 days of receipt

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    The proportion of participants who are complete questionnaires and timing of completion.

  3. Proportion of participants who provide the required blood sample for year 1 for Multi-Cancer Detection (MCD) testing within 90 days of recommended time point

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The proportion of participants who have a second blood draw and the timing of the blood draw.

  4. Proportion of participants considered lost to follow-up within 2 years of randomization

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The proportion of participants who do not complete study procedures and are not able to be contacted.

  5. Representative enrollment

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Meeting or exceeding the trial enrollment goals on a population basis.

  6. Staggered start of intervention arm 2

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

    Advantages and challenges arising from trial activation with one intervention arm and later addition of a second intervention arm.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact of participant blinding

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Comparisons between blinded and unblinded sites on participation rates, adherence to protocol-required questionnaires and blood collection, and participation in standard of care screening.

  2. Timely return of MCD test result

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The time from receipt of the MCD test result at the Statistics and Data Management Center to the time of receipt of the MCD test result at the ACCESS Hub. The time from receipt of MCD test result at the ACCESS Hub to the time of participant receipt of the MCD test result.

  3. Factors contributing to lack of diagnostic resolution of an abnormal MCD test

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Factors that contribute to the inability to determine if a participant has a cancer or rule out cancer.

  4. Contamination

    Time frame: Up to 3 years

    Estimated as the number of participants receiving MCD testing outside the trial.

  5. Effects of participant characteristics

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Feasibility outcomes will be reported by participant demographics and cancer risk factors.

  6. Diagnostic resolution following an abnormal MCD test result

    Time frame: Within 12 months following an abnormal MCD test result

    The proportion of participants with a "cancer diagnosis" or "no cancer diagnosis" among all participants with an abnormal MCD test result

  7. Time to diagnostic resolution

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The number of days from date of ACCESS Hub receipt of abnormal MCD test result to date of provider-reported diagnostic resolution.

  8. Participation in standard of care screening

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The proportion of participants that receive standard of care cancer screening in each arm.

  9. Accuracy of tissue of origin prediction

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The proportion of diagnosed cancers that match the tissue of origin predicted by an abnormal (positive) MCD test, for each screening episode.

  10. Complications related to diagnostic evaluation of an abnormal MCD test result

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

    Adverse events occurring in participants undergoing a diagnostic workup following receipt of an abnormal MCD test result.

  11. Anxiety and Cancer Worry Questionnaire

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Participant anxiety will be assessed with the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instrument. Cancer-related worry will be assessed using the Lehrman Cancer Worry Scale.

  12. Sensitivity of clinical diagnostic performance of each MCD assay

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Sensitivity will be estimated for each MCD assay. These sensitivities will also be calculated by early- versus late-stage, and for MCD test-targeted cancers and all cancers.

  13. Specificity of each MCD assay

    Time frame: 1 year

    Specificity will be estimated for each MCD assay.

  14. Test positive rates

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The proportion of abnormal MCD tests at each screening episode, and the proportion of participants with at least one abnormal test.

  15. False positives

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The number of participants with an abnormal MCD test and no cancer diagnosis.

  16. (Targeted cancer) Positive predictive value (PPV)

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The proportion of abnormal MCD tests that result in diagnosis of one of the MCD test-targeted cancers among participants with at least one abnormal test, for each screening episode.

  17. (All cancer) PPV

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The proportion of abnormal MCD tests that result in diagnosis of any cancer among participants with at least one abnormal test, for each screening episode.

  18. Interval cancers

    Time frame: 1 year

    The number of MCD test-targeted cancer cases diagnosed within 12 months of a normal MCD test result among participants who received an MCD test, for each screening episode.

  19. Detected cancers

    Time frame: 1 year

    The number of cancer cases diagnosed within a 12-month follow-up period of an abnormal test result among participants who received an MCD test, for each screening episode.

  20. (Targeted cancer) Negative predictive value

    Time frame: 1 year

    The proportion of normal MCD tests that did not result in diagnosis of one of the MCD test-targeted cancers among participants with a normal test, for each screening episode.

Other outcomes

  1. Cancer stage

    Time frame: Up to 12 years

    The stage that a cancer was diagnosed (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER]).

  2. Early and late stages cancer diagnosis

    Time frame: Up to 12 years

    Counts of early and late-stage cancers by arm, separately for each cancer type. Early stage is defined as in situ or localized (SEER). Late stage is defined as regional or distant stage (SEER).

  3. Targeted cancer-specific mortality of each MCD assay

    Time frame: Up to 12 years

    The fraction of MCD-targeted cancers diagnosed during trial participation that resulted in death.

  4. Cancer-specific mortality

    Time frame: Up to 12 years

    The fraction of all cancers diagnosed during trial participation that resulted in death.

  5. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: Up to 12 years

    The probability of participant death by any cause during trial participation, by arm.

  6. Estimated costs associated with MCD testing minus estimated costs associated with standard of care screening

    Time frame: Up to 12 years

    Will estimate average screening costs associated with MCD testing, evaluation of abnormal MCD tests, standard of care screening and evaluation of abnormal standard of care screening results (all MCD arm participants are encouraged to receive standard of care screening), plus cancer site and stage specific treatment costs sourced from the published literature.

  7. Participant out of pocket costs

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Portions of direct medical care costs paid directly by participants (e.g., copays, deductibles and uncovered medical bills) and direct non-medical participant costs; for example, transportation costs, travel time and distance, accommodation costs, childcare or elder-care costs will be elicited through an adapted version of the Costs for Patients Questionnaire.

  8. Participant work loss

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Participant and caregiver time spent away from work will be estimated using an adapted version of the Productivity Cost Questionnaire. The dollar value of hours recorded for participant work loss and caregiver time will be estimated using wages from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

  9. Proportion of participants who complete the Military Exposure Questionnaire

    Time frame: At baseline

    Will evaluate the proportion of participants who complete the Military Exposure Questionnaire, among those who reported military service.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Nih

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
May 30, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.