University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT03151564
To compare 2 different image creation/processing techniques during a standard CT scan in order to "see" problems in the liver and learn which method provides better image quality. The techniques use new artificial intelligence software to decrease image noise, which helps the radiologist to evaluate.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Primary Objective:
To evaluate whether post-processing software Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR), ASIR-V, Veo 3.0 (GE version of Model-based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR), and Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) is able to preserve lesion detection in the liver and other measures of image quality at reduced radiation doses for computed tomography (CT).
Secondary Objectives:
Assessment of whether post-processing software enhances lesion detection in the liver and other measures of image quality at standard and reduced radiation doses.
Assessment of whether DLIR and GSI DLIR reconstructions perform differently, both in terms of accuracy and image quality metrics such as noise reduction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants undergo routine standard of care CT examination for colon carcinoma restaging, then have an additional scan of the liver at 50% dose reduction.
Other names: CT scan
Participants undergo routine standard of care CT examination for colon carcinoma restaging, then have an additional scan of the liver at 70% dose reduction.
Other names: CT scan
Participants to receive standard-of-care imaging without the artificial intelligence software and imaging technique.
Time frame: 1 day
Primary endpoint is metastasis detection accuracy status of each patient, where the standard of care scan reviewed by ''truth readers'' (independent to the blinded radiologists) serve as the gold standard. If any lesion of a patient is diagnosed as metastasis by "truth readers" or blinded readers' consensus, that patient will be considered true positive and diagnosis positive, respectively. The expected accuracy of standard CT is 95%, and a low dose CT detection be considered non-inferior if its accuracy is 85% or higher.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02465060
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07405476
Colon Carcinoma, Colonic Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06640166
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colon Cancer
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT03064308
Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim), Adenocarcinoma
Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details