Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06060912

LAmbre Versus AMPLATZER Amulet Left AtrIal Appendage Occluder for StRoke ProphylaxIs

The objective of this trial is to compare two different commercially available left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices in patients with non-valvular Atrial fibrillation/ atrial flutter (AF) at increased risk for stroke with regard to safety and efficacy.

The investigators hypothesize that LAAO using the LAmbre occlusion device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) is non-inferior to LAAO using the AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (Abbott Medical, Chicago, ILL, USA) with regards to the primary endpoint, which is peri-device leak (PDL) size 3 months after LAAO, as assessed with transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in patients with non-valvular AF.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München

Munich, Bavaria, 80636, Germany

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Tobias Rheude, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+49 89 1218 2985

About this study

AMPIRI is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multi-center, open-label, non-inferiority other clinical investigation. All consecutive patients with non-valvular AF at increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism based on CHA2DS2-VASc score not eligible for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy will qualify for screening. Patients with confirmed eligibility and who have given written informed consent will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to group A (LAmbre LAAO device) or group B (AMPLATZER Amulet LAAO device). Clinical indication, technique, and timing of LAAO will be at the operator's discretion.

The investigators hypothesize that LAAO using the LAmbre occlusion device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) is non-inferior to LAAO using the AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (Abbott Medical, Chicago, ILL, USA) with regards to the primary endpoint, which is PDL size 3 months after LAAO, as assessed with TOE in patients with non-valvular AF.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years and able to give consent
  • Documented paroxysmal, persistent or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation/ atrial flutter (AF) at high risk of stroke or systemic embolism defined by CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 (male) or ≥ 3 (female)
  • Patient not eligible for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy
  • Deemed suitable for percutaneous LAAO
  • Able to comply with the required medication regimen after LAAO device implantation
  • Written informed consent
  • LAA anatomy can accommodate either a LAmbre or AMPLATZER Amulet LAAO device, as per manufacturer's instruction for use (IFU) (the anatomy and sizing must be appropriate for both devices in order to be enrolled in the trial)
  • For women of childbearing potential, negative pregnancy test and agree to use reliable method of birth control during the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Indication for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy for a condition other than AF (i. e. pulmonary embolism, mechanical heart valve)
  • LAA is obliterated or surgically ligated
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the LAAO devices or components of the required medication regimen
  • Prior atrial septal defect (ASD) repair or implantation of ASD closure device
  • Active endocarditis or other infection producing bacteremia
  • Significant symptomatic carotid artery disease
  • Participation in a concurrent clinical trial, which may confound the results of this trial
  • Patient cannot adhere to or complete the trial protocol for any reason

Or any of the following echocardiographic exclusion criteria:

  • Intracardiac thrombus
  • Intracardiac tumor
  • Existing, clinically relevant circumferential pericardial effusion
  • Significant mitral valve stenosis

Treatment and study plan

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Device

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion will be performed according to current international standards by experienced operators under TOE and angiographic guidance. Either a LAmbre occlusion device (group A) or an AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (group B) will be implanted depending on treatment allocation.

Primary outcomes

  1. PDL size after 3 months

    Time frame: three months

    Peri-device leak size (in mm) three months after successful LAAO as assessed with TOE.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Device Sucess

    Time frame: at index prozedure

    Defined as device deployed and implanted in correct position.

  2. Procedural Duration

    Time frame: at index procedure

    End time (closing of X-Ray) minus start time (access site puncture).

  3. Technical success

    Time frame: during index hospitalization

    Defined as exclusion of the LAA with residual peri device leak size ≤ 5mm and no device-related complications during index hospitalization.

  4. Procedural success

    Time frame: at index procedure

    defined as technical success with no procedure-related complications, except for uncomplicated (minor) device embolization

  5. Device-related complications

    Time frame: at three months

    All complications which are a result of the presence of the device and require either a surgical or percutaneous intervention or other medical treatment (device embolization, device erosion, clinically significant device interference with surrounding structure, device thrombus, device fracture, device infection/pericarditis, endocarditis, device perforation/laceration or device allergy)

  6. Procedure-related complications

    Time frame: during index hospitalization

    Pericardial effusion with or without tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or surgical intervention.

  7. Major bleeding

    Time frame: during index hospitalization

    Defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥ 3.

  8. Large residual peri-device leak size > 5mm

    Time frame: at three months

    Large peri device leak size (in mm) >5 mm three months after successful LAAO as assessed with TOE.

  9. Device thrombus

    Time frame: at three months

    Device thrombus at three months after successful LAAO as assessed with TOE.

  10. All-cause death or cardiovascular death

    Time frame: during index hospitalization and up to 24 months

    Cardiovascular Death:

    • Death due to proximate cardiac cause, e.g. myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, worsening heart failure, and endocarditis.
    • Death caused by non-coronary, non-CNS vascular conditions such as pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular disease.
    • Death from vascular CNS causes from haemorrhagic stroke or from ischaemic stroke.
    • All procedure-related deaths, including those related to a complication of the procedure or treatment for a complication of the procedure.
    • Sudden or unwitnessed death defined as non-traumatic, unexpected fatal event occurring within 1 hour of the onset of symptoms in an apparently healthy subject. If death is not witnessed, the definition applies when the victim was in good health 24 hours before the event.
    • Death of unknown cause:

    Non-cardiovascular death: Death of a primary cause that is clearly related to another condition (e.g. trauma, cancer, suicide).

  11. Composite of ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism

    Time frame: during index hospitalization and up to 24 months

    Incidence of ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism, as described below.

  12. All-stroke

    Time frame: during index hospitalization and up to 24 months

    Defined as an acute episode of focal or global neurological deficit with at least one of the following: change in the level of consciousness, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, one-sided numbness or sensory loss, dysphasia or aphasia, hemianopia, amaurosis fugax or any other neurological signs or symptoms consistent with stroke. It is caused by brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction. A transient ischemic attack (TIA) should be clearly distinguished from ischemic stroke, based on focal neurological symptoms lasting <24 hours and imaging-confirmed absence of acute brain infarction. Therefore, it is mandatory to recommend imaging confirmation as part of the diagnosis. Stroke assessment requires a neuroimaging and neurological examination, preferably by a neurologist.

  13. Systemic embolism

    Time frame: during index hospitalization and up to 24 months

    Systemic embolism: Acute vascular insufficiency or occlusion of the extremities or any non-central nervous system organ associated with clinical, imaging, surgical/autopsy evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanism (e.g., trauma, atherosclerosis, or instrumentation). When there is presence of prior peripheral artery disease, angiographic or surgical or autopsy evidence is required to show abrupt arterial occlusion.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Michael Joner, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4989-1218-2869

Tobias Rheude, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4989-1218-2985

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Other

Collaborators

  • Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

Registry information

Official study title

LAmbre Versus AMPLATZER Amulet Left AtrIal Appendage Occluder for StRoke ProphylaxIs: The Randomized AMPIRI Trial

Acronym: AMPIRI

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 29, 2023
Registry last updated
Jan 9, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.