Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03649360

Knee Pain After Intramedullary Nailing in the Tibia

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome after inserting an intramedullary nail in patients with a tibial shaft fracture using an injury-specific questionnaire.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Copenhagen University Hospital of Hvidovre

Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark

About this study

Introduction

The treatment of choice for unstable diaphyseal fractures in the tibia is reamed insertion of an intramedullary nail (IMN) with the additional placement of interlocking screws. The most common complication after insertion of an IMN as treatment of tibial shaft fractures is chronic knee pain with reported rates between 10 % and 87 % with a mean of 47,4 % in metaanalyses.

Methods

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome after inserting an IMN in patients with a tibial shaft fracture using an injury-specific questionnaire.

This study includes patients operated on five Danish hospitals. A database search was made using operational codes for insertion of an IMN in a five-year period. Patients aged 18 years or older, alive and residing in Denmark at the time of follow-up could be included in the study. These patients then received a Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) questionnaire by mail with questions regarding knee-specific symptoms, stiffness, pain, function and quality of life. Questionnaires were filled out and returned to the corresponding physician for further analyze. Patients who were unable to fill out the questionnaire due to concomitant physical condition or who had undergone amputation or further surgery on the affected limb were excluded.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older, alive and residing in Denmark at the time of follow-up could be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who were unable to fill out the questionnaire due to concomitant physical condition or who had undergone amputation or further surgery on the affected limb were excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Knee Pain after Tibial Shaft Fracture Treated with Intramedullary Nailing

    Time frame: 1st of November 2009 till 30th of October 2014.

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome after inserting an IMN in patients with a tibial shaft fracture using an injury-specific questionnaire. We used the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire to collect patient data. It is used to assess patient's subjective opinion about symptoms related to the knee and other associated problems. The questionnaire has been translated and validated in Danish and consists of 5 subscales: pain, symptoms, function in daily living (ADL) function in sports and recreation and knee-related QOL. Each subscale has between 4 and 17 questions (a total of 42 questions) with each question having 5 options ranging from no symptoms to severe symptoms. Each question gets a score from 0-4 and a score from 0-100 is calculated. 100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicates major symptoms.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Knee Pain After Tibial Shaft Fracture Treated With Intramedullary Nailing

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2016
First posted
Aug 28, 2018
Registry last updated
Aug 28, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.