Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
NCT Number: NCT05613257
This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the use of two different surgical techniques--free-hand versus distal targeting jig-based for distal interlock screw--placement and their effects on total operative time and intraoperative radiation exposure.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Interlocking screw placement in intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial shaft fractures improves rotational and length stability. However, free-hand perfect circle techniques can be technically challenging and may take up to an hour with increased radiation exposure to the surgeon and patient. Newer technologies aimed at reducing fluoroscope use such as electromagnetically-based aiming devices may increase the operative time. Proximally-based jigs have been shown to reduce fluoroscopy time in cadavers, however, have not been studied clinically. This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing a modern proximally-based distal targeting device and free-hand techniques for placement of interlocking screws in lower extremity nailing.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients in this arm will have an assistive targeting device used for interlocking screw placement. The targeting device is attached to the nail proximally or distally (for antegrade or retrograde nailing, respectively) to guide screw placement through the other end of the intramedullary device.
Patients in this arm will have no assistive targeting device use and the surgeon will use a free-hand technique for the placement of interlocking screws. With this technique, fluoroscopic images are taken such that the interlocking holes of the intramedullary device are "perfect circles" and indicate that a screw introduced in the same plane that the fluoroscopic image was taken would seat perpendicularly to the intramedullary device. This is the most commonly employed technique for interlocking screw placement through intramedullary devices.
Time frame: During surgery: The first fluoroscopy shot for distal interlocking screw placement to final fluoroscopy shot confirming the final screw's placement
Number of fluoroscopic images taken intraoperatively for screw placement and cumulative radiation exposure (in grays)
Time frame: During surgery: the first fluoroscopy shot to localize the jig or obtain a perfect circle (start) to the last shot to confirm complete seating of the screw (end time)
time taken to place interlocking screws
Time frame: Intraoperatively (at end of surgery)
Correct screw placement is at a right (90-degree) angle from the intramedullary nail, through the interlocking screw hole
Time frame: During surgery: The first fluoroscopy shot for distal interlocking screw placement to final fluoroscopy shot confirming the final screw's placement
Total radiation exposure during distal screw placement
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Other
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Free-Hand Versus Distal Targeting Jig-Based for Distal Interlock Screw Placement
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04761302
Femoral Fractures, Femur Fracture
San Juan, Puerto Rico
View Trial DetailsNCT00793637
Arm Injuries, Femoral Fractures
Innsbruck, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT06586190
Ankle Injuries, Femoral Fractures
View Trial DetailsNCT07434258
Biofilms, Femoral Fractures
View Trial Details