McMaster Children's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L9H6k6, Canada
NCT Number: NCT04528563
In children and adolescents (older than 6 years in age) who arrive in the pediatric emergency department because they have been having 5 days or less of abdominal pain (possible appendicitis), will patients who are treated with ketorolac get just as much pain relief as those patients treated with morphine?
To answer this research question, we will need a large number of patients in a study. To ensure we have enough patients, we must include many hospitals in different cities and provinces in the same study. Before doing this, though, we must first test a smaller version of the study in our center at McMaster Children's hosptial. The goal of doing this at McMaster first is to make sure or understand:
1. We can enroll enough people in our study over 1 year 2. We can make sure that all the information we collect from patients is complete and nothing is missing 3. Reasons behind why people don't want to participate in the study 4. How satisfied patients and their caregivers were with the study
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Hamilton, Ontario, L9H6k6, Canada
Background/Rationale: Appendicitis is the most common emergent surgical diagnosis among children between 5-17 years in age and accounts for 8000 admissions annually. Diagnosing appendicitis is time consuming (4-6 hours) as it requires laboratory tests and ultrasonography. This occurs while patients experience significant abdominal pain secondary to infection and localized or generalized peritonitis. Opioids have been the most prescribed analgesic for patients with suspected appendicitis, despite an ongoing opioid crisis. Our research shows that 60% of physicians use morphine or other opioids, while 40% will use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or other non-opioids. Even though ketorolac (NSAID) is commonly used in the Emergency Department (ED) for renal colic, abdominal pain and migraine headaches, and has a safer side effect profile than morphine, all such uses in children are "off label" as there are virtually no controlled trials for children to inform practice.
Objective: To determine if it is feasible to conduct a large multi-centre randomized non inferiority trial comparing ketorolac to morphine for treating moderate to severe abdominal pain, in children 6 years in age or older, with clinically suspected appendicitis.
Hypothesis: We hypothesize that it will be feasible to conduct a large trial based on a recruitment rate of ≥40% of eligible patients approached for consent.
Study Design: Our trial is a single-centre, block randomized, non-inferiority, double-dummy, doubleblind, feasibility pilot trial. Patients ≥ 6 years in age, who have ≤ 5 days of moderate-severe pain as defined by our validated 11-point verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) ≥ 5 and are being investigated for suspected appendicitis with intravenous (IV) access in situ or ordered, will be randomized to either: (1) IV ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg up to 30 mg (intervention) + IV morphine placebo, or (2) IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg up to 5 mg (active control) + IV ketorolac placebo. The total sample size is 100 participants. The study drugs will be identical in appearance, consistency and smell. The double-dummy design will ensure blinding is maintained for bedside clinical staff, research personnel and patients. Our study prioritized patient comfort and will largely mimic standard care. Pharmacologic co-interventions will be allowed but limited to acetaminophen (commonly used as first-line therapy). Participants in both groups will be allowed rescue therapy (morphine 0.5 mg/kg) within 60 minutes of our intervention. We will screen the ED daily for eligible patients as well as include all eligible patients for the New Investigator Fund (NIF)-funded quality improvement pathway we employed to streamline care for all ED appendicitis patients. We have a robust research program in the ED that includes students, a full-time research coordinator and several paid research assistants who screen eligible patients and approach them for consent and enrollment. Our entire project can be completed with NIF support within an 18-month study period.
Primary Outcome: Feasibility of our study design is the primary outcome of this pilot trial. Primary feasibility outcomes include: (1) proportion of patients consented from total eligible patients approached; (2) proportion of patients who completed clinical outcome assessment; and, (3) proportion of missing items on individual data collection forms. Our feasibility threshold is to recruit at least 40% of eligible patients who were approached to consent. Other thresholds include recruiting ≥8 participants/month on average and having at least 90% of participants complete all the outcome assessments at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.
Summary: Acute pain in children and youth is an area that is understudied and affects thousands of Canadian children. Despite short -and long-term adverse effects including dependence, and well designed comparative effectiveness trials, opioids continue to be overused in surgical patients. Ketorolac is a promising well-established NSAID that is available for IV, has a better short-term side effect profile and is not known as a substance of misuse. Our pilot will provide valuable feasibility data for a larger, future multicenter trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Non-Steroidal-Anti-Inflammatory given intravenously.
Opioid commonly used for acute abdominal pain given intravenously.
Time frame: 2 hours
proportion of patients consented from total eligible patients approached
Time frame: 2 hours
Proportion of participants who completed outcome assessment at all time points
Time frame: 14 days
Proportion of missing items on individual data collection forms (screening forms, baseline characteristics, outcome assessment, follow up survey)
Time frame: 14 days
Proportion of participants and caregivers who were satisfied with study procedures and interventions, on an 0-11 numeric satisfaction survey
Time frame: 2 hours
percentage and reasons for declining consent
Time frame: 2 hours
proportion of patients who withdrew consent
Time frame: 14 days
proportion of patients who fully completed the study (baseline characteristics, outcome assessment and follow-up survey).
Time frame: 2 hours
Within-group mean and standard deviation differences in pain as measured on verbal numerical pain scale (VNRS) for ketorolac and morphine at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes
Time frame: 2 hours
Proportion of participants who change their baseline pain category (mild 1 to 3, moderate 4 to 6, severe ≥7 on VNRS)
Time frame: 2 hours
Proportion of participants who achieved their desired pain state as determine on a numeric satisfaction scale (0-10)
Time frame: 2 hours
Time to effective analgesia (VNRS <3)
Time frame: 6 hours
Proportion of participants requiring rescue analgesia in each trial arm and the total amount administered as measured by morphine equivalent mg/kg within 6 hours of intervention
Time frame: 14 days
Frequency of missed appendicitis (diagnosed on a return visit within 7 days)
Time frame: 24 hours
Proportion of patients who had complete visualization of the appendix on ultrasound
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Other
Intravenous Ketorolac Vs. Morphine In Children Presenting With Suspected Appendicitis: A Pilot Single Center Non Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial
Acronym: KETO-APP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06160778
Abdomen, Acute, Abdominal Pain
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06296953
Abdomen, Acute, Abdominal Pain
Halmstad, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT04614649
Abdominal Pain, Appendicitis
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06835504
Abdominal Pain, Agnosia
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details