Alberta Children's Hospital Emergency Department
Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Angela Wallace
CONTACT
Mohamed Eltorki, MBChB, MSc
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06160778
Appendicitis is a common condition in children 6-17 years of age, and the top reason for emergency surgery in Canada. Children with appendicitis can have very bad pain in their belly. Children often need pain medications given to them through a needle in their arm called an intravenous (IV). The most common IV pain medication is a type of opioid called morphine. We know that opioids work well to improve pain, but there are risks and side effects when taking them. There are non-opioid medications that doctors can give to patients, like ketorolac. Ketorolac helps decrease inflammation and pain and has fewer side effects when a patient takes it for a short period of time. Our past and present overuse of opioids, driven by an unproven assumption that opioids work best for pain, resulted in an Opioid Crisis and doctors are now looking for alternatives. To do this, we need to prove that there are other options to treat children's pain that are just as good as opioids, with less side effects.
The goal of our study is to discover if school aged children who arrive at the emergency department with belly pain, improve just as much with ketorolac as they do with morphine. To answer this question, we will need a very large number of patients in a study that includes several hospitals across Canada. With a flip of a coin, each participant will either get a single dose of morphine or a single dose of ketorolac. To make sure that our pain assessment is impartial, no one will know which medicine the child received except the pharmacist who prepared the medicine.
Interested in participating?
Request Info6 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Angela Wallace
CONTACT
Mohamed Eltorki, MBChB, MSc
CONTACT
Background: Appendicitis, the most common surgical diagnosis in Canadian children aged 6-17 years, accounts for ~8000 admissions annually. Despite an ongoing opioid crisis, prescription narcotics remain a mainstay analgesic for children with suspected appendicitis. Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), which has a safer adverse event (AE) profile than opioids, is commonly used in emergency departments (EDs) for adults; however, use in children is considered off label due to a lack of randomized trials in this patient population. We propose a multi-centre clinical trial to address this knowledge gap,informed by our team's successful pilot trial.
Specific Aim 1: To determine if administering intravenous (IV) ketorolac is non inferior to IV morphine in reducing mean pain scores in children with suspected appendicitis.
Hypothesis: IV ketorolac will be non-inferior to IV morphine
Specific Aim 2: To determine between group differences in rates of AEs. Hypothesis: IV ketorolac will be associated with less AEs than IV morphine.
Design: A randomized quadruple blind (participant, clinician, outcome assessor, investigator) parallel group double-dummy trial in 4 Canadian pediatric EDs. Eligible patients will be 6-17 years with 5-days of moderate-severe pain (vNRS ≥5 ) being investigated for suspected appendicitis, with intravenous (IV) access, will be randomized to either:
Primary outcome: Between-group mean difference in pain on the vNRS at 60 minutes following administration.
Safety outcome: Proportion of children experiencing AEs related to study drug administration.
Secondary Outcomes: Between-group differences: (1) pain relief as measured on vNRS at 30, 90 and 120 minutes and at 6-8 hours; (2) proportion who achieves a 2-point vNRS (minimal important difference) pain score reduction at 60 and 120 minutes; (3) proportion of patients who change their baseline pain category (vNRS: mild 0-3, moderate 4-6, severe ≥7) at each time point; (4) time to effective analgesia as measured by the time when vNRS of <3 is achieved (5) proportion of patients requiring additional analgesia; (6) total opioids administered (i.e., morphine equivalent mg/kg within 8 hours of treatment); (7) frequency of specific types of AEs (e.g., dizziness); (8) frequency of delayed appendicitis diagnosis; and (9) Ramsay Sedation Score at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.
Sample size:With a non-inferiority margin of 1.0 (50% of the minimal important difference), 600 participants would give a power of 0.9 (1- β) to establish non-inferiority of ketorolac vs. morphine (significance level α = 0.05).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intravenous ketorolac given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.
Intravenous morphine given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.
Intravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as morphine) given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.
Other names: Morphine Sulfate Placebo
Time frame: 60 minutes post drug administration
Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal Numerical Rating Scale (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain ever)
Time frame: 30 minutes post drug administration
Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal
Time frame: 90 minutes post drug administration
Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal
Time frame: 120 minutes post drug administration
Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal
Time frame: 6 hours post drug administration
Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal
Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration
score from 0-10 on verbal numerical rating scale
Time frame: 60 minutes post drug administration
Proportion of participants who achieves the 2-point verbal Numerical Rating Scale minimal important difference pain score reduction
Time frame: 120 minutes post drug administration
Proportion of participants who achieves the 2-point verbal Numerical Rating Scale minimal important difference pain score reduction
Time frame: 30 minutes post drug administration
Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe >7)
Time frame: 60 minutes post drug administration
Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe >7)
Time frame: 90 minutes post drug administration
Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe >7)
Time frame: 120 minutes post drug administration
Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe >7)
Time frame: 6 hours post drug administration
Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe >7)
Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration
Duration of time from time of drug administration to time at which a verbal Numerical Rating Scale ≤3 is achieved.
Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration
Proportion of participants requiring any additional analgesia in each trial arm
Time frame: up to 8 hours post drug administration
total morphine-equivalent mg/kg administered for all trial participants
Time frame: 30 minutes post drug administration
Assessment of sedation levels post drug administration; score is 1-6 (1 is alert, 6 is not responsive)
Time frame: 60 minutes post drug administration
Assessment of sedation levels post drug administration; score is 1-6 (1 is alert, 6 is not responsive)
Time frame: 90 minutes post drug administration
Assessment of sedation levels post drug administration; score is 1-6 (1 is alert, 6 is not responsive)
Time frame: 120 minutes post drug administration
Assessment of sedation levels post drug administration; score is 1-6 (1 is alert, 6 is not responsive)
Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration
Frequency of specific adverse event occurrence per participant enrolled
Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration
Frequency of each specific adverse event occurrence
Time frame: post-randomization and up to 8 hours post-intervention.
proportion of participants who had the appendix visualized on ultrasound
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Angela Wallace
CONTACT
Mohamed M Eltorki, MBChB, MSc
CONTACT
University of Calgary
Other
Intravenous Ketorolac Vs. Morphine In Children Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain And/or Suspected Appendicitis: A Multi-centre Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: KETOAPP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05651360
Abdominal Pain, Acute Appendicitis
Odense, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05641363
Abdominal Pain, Acute Pain
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05497830
Acute Pain, Disease Attributes
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT03571737
Acute Musculoskeletal Disease, Acute Pain
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details