Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04602923

Keratometric Change After XEN, Trabeculectomy and Tube Shunts

The main goal of this study is to assess the severity of postoperative corneal astigmatism induced by implantation of the XEN Gel Stent compared to that induced by traditional filtering surgery (trabeculectomy and GDDs). Corneal astigmatism can be assessed using corneal topography, a non-invasive tool which provides an accurate estimate of corneal curvature in all meridians. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet attempted to quantify the amount of astigmatism induced by the XEN Gel Stent.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4, Canada

About this study

Following glaucoma surgery, patients often experience decreased visual acuity (VA) which can partly be explained by induced changes to the optical properties of the cornea. Corneal astigmatism can be assessed using corneal topography, a non-invasive tool which provides an accurate estimate of corneal curvature in all meridians. Obtained keratometric measures (termed K values) can allow clinicians to quantify the amount of astigmatism before and after surgical intervention.

Multiple studies have been previously published to evaluate induced postoperative astigmatism after trabeculectomy. However, only two studies have characterized the impact of GDDs on keratometric values. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet attempted to quantify the amount of astigmatism induced by the XEN Gel Stent.

Assessing the impact of the XEN implant on corneal astigmatism is important to better characterize the expected course of postoperative visual rehabilitation, the impact of novel glaucoma devices on corneal properties and the predictability of refractive outcomes after XEN implantation. Compared to traditional filtering surgery, the XEN Gel Stent is inserted without opening the conjunctiva and is implanted further from the corneal limbus (5 mm). These factors may allow for a reduced amount of surgically induced corneal astigmatism.

We hypothesize that the XEN Gel Stent implantation induces less corneal astigmatism compared to traditional filtering surgery, such as the trabeculectomy and GDDs (BGI or AGV).

The main goal of this prospective interventional comparative study is to assess the severity of postoperative corneal astigmatism induced by implantation of the XEN Gel Stent compared to that induced by traditional filtering surgery (trabeculectomy and GDDs).

Secondary objectives are evaluation of visual acuity recovery as well as IOP reduction and other parameters between groups.

Glaucoma surgery (XEN Gel Stent, trabeculectomy or GDD implantation) will be performed by the ophthalmologists in charge of the study according to standard procedures. For each patient, the most appropriate type of glaucoma surgery will be recommended by the ophthalmologist regardless of patients' participation in the study, as dictated by the specific nature of their glaucoma and following current standards of care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Eyes with an IOP above target and/or progressing on maximally tolerated medical therapy;
  • Patients aged 18 years or older;
  • Ability to provide informed consent;
  • Ability to be followed for the entire duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients less than 18 years old;
  • Inability to provide informed consent;
  • Inability to be followed for the entire duration of the study;
  • Patients undergoing surgery combined with cataract extraction;
  • Presence of severe dry eye disease;
  • Presence of ocular comorbidities other than glaucoma, such as corneal or retinal disease.

Treatment and study plan

Corneal topography: OPD-Scan

Diagnostic Test

Corneal topography photography, taken by specular reflection (OPD-Scan) by measuring corneal curvature, thickness and topography.

Corneal topography: Pentacam

Diagnostic Test

Corneal topography photography, taken by Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) by measuring corneal curvature, thickness and topography.

Primary outcomes

  1. Keratometric values (OPD-Scan)

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months

    Change in simulated keratometric (K) values obtained by OPD-Scan between the indicated timepoints.

  2. Keratometric values (Pentacam)

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months

    Change in simulated keratometric (K) values obtained by Pentacam between the indicated timepoints.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Best-corrected visual acuity change

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months

    Evaluation of visual acuity change, measured using the Snellen chart.

  2. Intraocular pressure change

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months

    Evaluation of intraocular pressure control, measured using gold standard Goldmann applanation tonometry.

  3. Visual field change change

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

    Evaluation of visual field change. Visual field change will be calculated using the mean deviation (MD) values and pattern standard deviation (PSD) values measured using automated Humphrey 24-2 perimetry.

  4. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness change

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

    Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness change (µm), using the average RNFL thickness values measured using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT). The change in thickness (µm) will be calculated between the time points described.

  5. Ganglion cell layer thickness change

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

    Evaluation of ganglion cell layer (GCL+) thickness. This GCL+ thickness is measured using the values for the average ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer thickness of the retina (value called "Average GCL + IPL thickness") obtained by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT). The change in thickness (µm) will be calculated between the time points described.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Other

Collaborators

  • Allergan

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Keratometric Change After Xen Gel Stent Implantation, Trabeculectomy, and Tube Shunts

Acronym: Topo-XEN

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Oct 26, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 9, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.