Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
NCT Number: NCT00850889
Juvederm Ultra With Lidocaine Compared With Restylane for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of Juvederm Ultra with lidocaine compared with Restylane in the correction of nasolabial folds.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary location
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Desires correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs)
- Both NLFs have the same pre-treatment NLF severity score (either moderate or severe)
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at baseline and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study
Exclusion criteria
- Cosmetic facial procedures [e.g., facelift, resurfacing (laser, photomodulation, intense pulsed light, radio frequency, dermabrasion, chemical peel or other ablative or non-ablative procedures), tissue augmentation with dermal fillers or fat injections, BOTOX Cosmetic injections, or mesotherapy] in the lower 2/3 of the face, including the neck, within 1 month prior to study entry or be planning to undergo any of these procedures at any time during the study
- Initiating use of any new over-the-counter or prescription, oral or topical, anti-wrinkle products in the NLF area within 1 month prior to enrollment or during the study
- Previous hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal filler treatment(s) injected within the last 12 months prior to enrollment is within 5mL of the recommended annual maximum volume for HA dermal fillers
- Previous injection of semi-permanent fillers or placement of facial implants anywhere in the head and neck or implantation of any of these products during the study
- Allergy or sensitivity to lidocaine, hyaluronic acid products, or Streptococcal protein
- Active inflammation, infection, cancerous or pre-cancerous lesion or unhealed wound in the NLF region
- Current treatment with anti-coagulation therapy or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or other substances known to increase coagulation time within 10 days of undergoing study injections
Treatment and study plan
Hyaluronic acid gel (24 mg/mL) with 0.3% lidocaine
DeviceDay 0, maximum total volume (dosage) allowed for each NLF is 1.6 mL
Other names: Juvederm® Ultra Injectable Gel with Lidocaine
A gel of hyaluronic acid (concentration of 20 mg/mL)
DeviceDay 0, maximum total volume (dosage) allowed for each NLF is 1.6 mL
Other names: Restylane® Injectable Gel
Primary outcomes
-
Procedural Pain Score
Time frame: 1 day
Subjects evaluated the pain associated with the procedure on an 11-point scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Secondary outcomes
-
Comparative Pain
Time frame: 1 day
A 5-point scale (-2 = Juvéderm with Lidocaine less painful than Restylane; -1 = Juvéderm with Lidocaine slightly less painful than Restylane; 0 = No difference; 1 = Juvéderm with Lidocaine slightly more painful than Restylane; 2 = Juvéderm with Lidocaine more painful than Restylane). Subjects selected one category from the scale; the percentage of subjects that selected each category is presented.
-
Investigator Assessment of Improvement Since Baseline in Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity
Time frame: Day 0, Day 14
Investigator determination of improvement in NLF severity score on 5-point NLF Severity Scale (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Extreme) two weeks after treatment with Juvéderm with Lidocaine in one NLF and Restylane in the other NLF
-
Subject Assessment of Improvement From Baseline in Nasolabial Fold (NLF) Severity
Time frame: Day 0, Day 14
Subject determination of improvement in NLF severity score on 5-point NLF Severity Scale (0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Severe; 4 = Extreme) two weeks after treatment with Juvéderm with Lidocaine in one NLF and Restylane in the other NLF
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Allergan Medical
Industry
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2008
- Primary completion
- 2008
- Study completion
- 2008
- First posted
- Feb 25, 2009
- Registry last updated
- Jan 9, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Study of the Subdermal Implant "Ultracol"
NCT07617350
Facial Lipoatrophy, Facial Wrinkles
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsExtension Study for 43USSA1705
NCT04225273
Nasolabial Folds
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsStudy for the Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the Dermal Filler Princess® VOLUME in Nasolabial Folds
NCT01798498
Nasolabial Folds
Graz, Austria
View Trial DetailsA Study to Assess Adverse Events and Effectiveness of HAC 20L Injections in Adult Participants for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds
NCT06018987
Nasolabial Folds
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
View Trial Details