Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04225273

Extension Study for 43USSA1705

To evaluate the long-term safety of Sculptra Aesthetic as a single regimen for correction of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) contour deficiencies after changes in reconstitution and injection procedures compared to the approved label.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

22 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Galderma Study Site, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Randomized to Sculptra Aesthetic 8ml reconstitution and successfully completed study 43USSA1705

Exclusion criteria

  • Medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion
  • Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
  • Participation in any interventional clinical study throughout the duration of the study

Treatment and study plan

Sculptra Aesthetic, Lidocaine HCL

Device

No intervention was administered during this extension study.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline on Both Sides of the Face as Assessed by the Evaluator Using the WAS at Weeks 72 and 96

    Time frame: Baseline of study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244), Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    The WAS is a validated photograph-based outcome instrument that is designed specifically for quantifying facial folds. Scoring of NLF wrinkle severity (grades 0-5, with 0 representing no wrinkles and 5 representing very deep wrinkles, redundant fold) was based on visual live assessment by the Blinded Evaluator at defined timepoints. Lower scores indicate better outcome. Effectiveness is defined as change from baseline on both sides of the face using WAS at 72 and 96 weeks after the first treatment session. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Based on the Participants Live Assessment

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A responder was defined as a participant assessed as at least "Improved" (very much improved, much improved, and improved) on both sides of the face concurrently assessed using GAIS by participant. The 7-graded GAIS used by the participant to live assess the aesthetic improvement had responses as follows: (3) Very Much Improved, (2) Much Improved, (1) Improved, (0) No Change, (-1) Worse, (-2) Much Worse, and (-3) Very Much Worse. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range -3 to 3). Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  2. Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the GAIS Based on the Investigator Live Assessment

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A responder was defined as a participant assessed as at least "Improved" (very much improved, much improved, and improved) on both sides of the face concurrently assessed using GAIS by investigator. The 7-graded GAIS used by the participant to live assess the aesthetic improvement had responses as follows: (3) Very Much Improved, (2) Much Improved, (1) Improved, (0) No Change, (-1) Worse, (-2) Much Worse, and (-3) Very Much Worse. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range -3 to 3). Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705. (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  3. FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Lines Rasch Transformed Total Scores: NLF Questionnaire

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    FACE-Q™ appraisal of lines NLF scores were used to assess participant's treatment satisfaction. The sum of the participants FACE-Q™ appraisal of lines NLF scores was converted to a Rasch-transformed total score (ranged from 0 to 100) according to the FACE-Q™ manual; a higher total score indicated greater participant satisfaction. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705. (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  4. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Recommend the Treatment to a Friend?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A subject satisfaction question with responses Yes or No. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  5. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You do the Treatment Again?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A subject satisfaction question with responses Yes or No. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  6. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Say the Subtle Treatment Results Over Time Was Worth it?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705. (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  7. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Say the Treatment Results Are Natural Looking?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point participant satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  8. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Facial Symmetry/Balance?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  9. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look the Way You Feel?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  10. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look/Feel More Confident in Your Life?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  11. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Self-confidence?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  12. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Overall Satisfaction With Your Appearance?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  13. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Feel Better About Yourself?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  14. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Attractiveness?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  15. Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look Younger?

    Time frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

  16. Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

    Time frame: From Baseline of study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244) up to Week 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs of a clinical investigation in participants, whether or not related to the investigational device which included events related to the investigational product (IP) or the reference product, events related to the procedures involved and events that were anticipated as well as unanticipated. SAE: an AE resulting in death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAE: any AEs occurring or worsening at or after first dose of IP or ongoing at time of enrollment. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Galderma R&D

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Open Label Extension Study for 43USSA1705 (A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Sculptra Aesthetic for Correction of Nasolabial Folds)

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 13, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 12, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.