Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05991154

JoyPop Mobile Mental Health App With Indigenous Transitional-Aged Youth

Indigenous youth in Northwestern Ontario who need mental health supports experience longer waits than non-Indigenous youth within the region and when compared to youth in other more urban areas. Limited access and extended waits can exacerbate symptoms, prolong distress, and increase risk for more serious outcomes. Transitional aged youth (i.e., those in their mid-late teens to early twenties) are a particularly vulnerable group. Novel, innovative approaches are urgently needed to provide support for Indigenous youth in Northwestern Ontario. In partnership with Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, the investigators are evaluating the impact of a mental health app (JoyPop) as a tool for Indigenous transitional-aged youth who are waiting for mental health services. The JoyPop app was developed to support improved emotion regulation - a key difficulty for youth presenting with mental health challenges. A two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the app compared to usual practice while Indigenous transitional-aged youth are waiting for mental health services.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Lakehead University

Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B5E1, Canada

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Aislin R Mushquash, Ph.D.

CONTACT

Amanda Newton, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Arto Ohinmaa, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Elaine Toombs, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Fred Schmidt, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Janine Olthuis, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Sherry Stewart, PhD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Indigenous youth in Northwestern Ontario who need mental health supports experience longer waits than non-Indigenous youth within the region and when compared to youth in other more urban areas. Limited access and extended waits can exacerbate symptoms, prolong distress, increase risk for more serious outcomes like suicide, self-harm, and hospitalization, and negatively impact engagement in treatment once it is offered. Transitional aged youth (i.e., those in their mid-late teens to early twenties) are a particularly vulnerable group as they are navigating many developmental challenges (e.g., identity, relationships, schooling, housing) with the loss of supports and structures that may have been in place during childhood and adolescence. Transitional aged youth in underserviced areas such as Northwestern Ontario have increased need for and decreased access to mental health treatment, especially those in rural and remote areas. Novel, innovative approaches are urgently needed to provide support for Indigenous youth in Northwestern Ontario.

In partnership with Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, the investigators are evaluating the impact of a mental health app (JoyPop) as a tool for Indigenous transitional-aged youth who are waiting for mental health services. The JoyPop app was developed to support improved emotion regulation - a key difficulty for youth presenting with mental health challenges. Despite the promise of mobile mental health apps, significant gaps exist between the growing number of apps available in the public domain and empirical demonstration of the beneficial impacts of apps for users. Of the apps that address emotion regulation, most have not been evaluated, are narrow in scope, or have only been evaluated among non-diverse adult populations. The JoyPop app includes a broader focus, and this research is unique given its focus on rigorously evaluating the JoyPop app as a tool for treatment-seeking, Indigenous transitional-aged youth in Northwestern Ontario.

Using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, the primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of the JoyPop app in improving emotion regulation among Indigenous transitional-aged youth (18-25) who are waiting for mental health services as compared to usual practice (UP; monitoring those on the wait-list). The secondary objectives are to: (1) Assess change in mental health difficulties and treatment readiness between youth in each condition to better understand the app's broader impact as a wait-list tool; (2) Conduct an economic analysis to determine whether receiving the app while waiting for mental health services reduces other health service use and associated costs; (3) Define the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the primary outcome measure; and (4) Assess youth perspective the quality of the JoyPop app.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Indigenous transitional-aged youth must be on the wait-list for mental health services at Dilico Anishinabek Family Care and be between 18-25 years old.
  • Eligible youth will also need to be available to attend a virtual or in-person orientation session.
  • In order to download the JoyPop app, participants will need access to an iOS device (e.g., iPhone, iPad). Refurbished iPhones containing just the JoyPop app will be provided to participants to use for the duration of the trial if they do not have access to their own.

Treatment and study plan

Usual Practice + JoyPop

Behavioral

Participants will be asked to use the app at least twice daily but will otherwise not be provided with requirements related to feature or total usage.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in emotion regulation (overall)

    Time frame: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotion regulation will be assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form. Total scores range from 18 to 90 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties in emotion regulation.

  2. Change in emotion regulation (strategies)

    Time frame: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotion regulation strategies will be assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form strategies subscale. Total scores range from 3 to 15 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties.

  3. Change in emotion regulation (non-acceptance)

    Time frame: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotion regulation strategies will be assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form non-acceptance subscale. Total scores range from 3 to 15 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties.

  4. Change in emotion regulation (impulse)

    Time frame: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotion regulation strategies will be assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form impulse subscale. Total scores range from 3 to 15 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties.

  5. Change in emotion regulation (goals)

    Time frame: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotion regulation strategies will be assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form goals subscale. Total scores range from 3 to 15 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties.

  6. Change in emotion regulation (awareness)

    Time frame: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotion regulation strategies will be assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form awareness subscale. Total scores range from 3 to 15 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties.

  7. Change in emotion regulation (clarity)

    Time frame: Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotion regulation strategies will be assessed with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form clarity subscale. Total scores range from 3 to 15 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in psychological distress

    Time frame: Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Psychological distress will be assessed with the total score for all items on the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21. Total scores range from 0 to 63 with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.

  2. Change in depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed with the Depression subscale of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21. Total scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  3. Change in anxious symptoms

    Time frame: Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed with the Anxiety subscale of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21. Total scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  4. Change in stress

    Time frame: Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed with the Stress subscale of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21. Total scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  5. Change is overall difficulties

    Time frame: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Overall difficulties will be assessed with the total score from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (all subscales except prosocial). Total scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating worse difficulties.

  6. Change is emotional problems

    Time frame: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotional problems will be assessed with the Emotional Problems subscale from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse emotional problems.

  7. Change is conduct problems

    Time frame: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotional problems will be assessed with the Conduct Problems subscale from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse conduct problems.

  8. Change is hyperactivity

    Time frame: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotional problems will be assessed with the Hyperactivity subscale from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse hyperactivity.

  9. Change is peer problems

    Time frame: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotional problems will be assessed with the Peer Problems subscale from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse peer problems.

  10. Change is prosocial behaviour

    Time frame: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Emotional problems will be assessed with the Prosocial subscale from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Total scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse prosocial behaviour.

  11. Change in treatment readiness

    Time frame: Treatment Readiness subscale of the Motivation for Youth's Treatment Scale will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Treatment readiness will be assessed with the Treatment Readiness subscale of the Motivation for Youth's Treatment Scale. Total scores range from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater readiness.

Other outcomes

  1. App quality (overall)

    Time frame: User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale will be administered to the intervention group after 4 weeks (post)

    App quality (overall) will be assessed with the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Total scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater quality.

  2. App quality (engagement)

    Time frame: User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale will be administered to the intervention group after 4 weeks (post)

    App quality (engagement) will be assessed with the Engagement subscale of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Total scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater quality (engagement).

  3. App quality (functionality)

    Time frame: User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale will be administered to the intervention group after 4 weeks (post)

    App quality (functionality) will be assessed with the Functionality subscale of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Total scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater quality (functionality).

  4. App quality (aesthetics)

    Time frame: User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale will be administered to the intervention group after 4 weeks (post)

    App quality (aesthetics) will be assessed with the Aesthetics subscale of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Total scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater quality (aesthetics).

  5. App quality (information)

    Time frame: User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale will be administered to the intervention group after 4 weeks (post)

    App quality (information) will be assessed with the Information subscale of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Total scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater quality (information).

  6. App quality (subjective)

    Time frame: User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale will be administered to the intervention group after 4 weeks (post)

    App quality (subjective) will be assessed with the Subjective subscale of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Total scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater quality (subjective).

  7. App quality (perceived impact)

    Time frame: User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale will be administered to the intervention group after 4 weeks (post)

    App quality (perceived impact) will be assessed with the Perceived Impact subscale of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Total scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater quality (perceived impact).

  8. Service utilization

    Time frame: Service utilization measure will be administered at baseline (pre), after 2 weeks (mid), and after 4 weeks (post)

    Service utilization will be assessed with 5 items asking about frequency of healthcare services accessed over the prior 2 weeks. Response options are open-ended and will be analyzed individually and as a total score across service types.

  9. Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)

    Time frame: GRC will be administered to the intervention group after 2 weeks (mid) and 4 weeks (post)

    On the Global Rating of Change (GRC), the smallest change in emotion regulation that participants identify as important after completing the trial will be used to calculate the MCID. The GRC is an 11-point Likert scale (ranging from -5 to +5; -5 very much worse, 0 unchanged, +5 very much better) used to indicate the degree to which emotion regulation changed for the better, for the worse, or no change after receiving the intervention.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Aislin R Mushquash, Ph.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

807-343-8010 ext. 8771

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Lakehead University

Other

Collaborators

  • Dilico Anishinabek Family Care

Registry information

Official study title

Increasing Access to Mental Health Support for 18-25 Year Old Indigenous Youth With the JoyPop Mobile Mental Health App: Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Registry last updated
Sep 5, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.