Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resin Versus Band-and-Loop Space Maintainers in Children: A Split-Mouth Clinical Study
NCT07730944
Malocclusion, Mouth Diseases
Najran, Najran Region, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT06235138
Background: Jawline improvement is nowadays a strong patients' demand. Among patients undergoing orthognathic surgery, it remains sometimes a challenge to manage angle definition due to the classic mandibular osteotomy trait which mostly allows sagittal mandibular movements but can't modify the ramus height. A few types of osteotomies can be used to improve jawline's shape while correcting malocclusion, but they remain technically difficult and often imply the necessity for bone grafting and/or the use of a specific saw and screwdriver. The advent of computer-assisted surgical planning and computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques for patient-specific implant (PSI) fabrication has enabled new methods for managing the jawline in orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study was to assess jawline improvement with patient-specific angle implants in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery with standard osteotomies.Methods: A virtual simulation of a Le Fort I osteotomy (if needed), a sagittal split ramus osteotomy with patient-specific titanium angle implants, and a genioplasty (if needed) was conducted on a preoperative three-dimensional (3D) model of each patient's skull using ProPlan CMF software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Computer-assisted osteotomy saw-and-drill guides and patient-specific implants (PSIs, titanium plates and angle implants) were produced and used during the surgery. The investigators chose to focus on jawline improvement by comparing the preoperative and the post-operative 3D-photographs using the VECTRA H2 3D imagine system (Canfield Scientific, **).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–43 year
All sexes
Observational
CHU NICE, Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Time frame: postoperative week 4
The primary outcome of interest was the postoperative aspect and position of the gonial angle, assessed by 3D-stereophotogrametry
Time frame: From post operative week 1 to one year follow-up
Scale title = échelle de Likert. Maximum score 5 (= not satisfied) / minimum score 1 (= total satisfaction)
Time frame: From post operative week 1 to one year follow-up
Secondary outcome of interest is number and type of complications
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07730944
Malocclusion, Mouth Diseases
Najran, Najran Region, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT07628491
Esthetics, Dental, Malocclusion
Sibiu, Sibiu County, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT07716007
Alveolar Bone Loss, Behavior
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07331090
Anxiety Disorders, Crossbite
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details