Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04562896

Iterative Design of Custom Dynamic Orthoses to Reduce Articular Contact Stress

The proposed study evaluates the effect of carbon fiber brace design on forces across the ankle joint. Research suggests that ankle arthritis develops after ankle fracture, in part, due to elevated forces on the cartilage. It is expected that carbon fiber braces can be designed to reduce forces in the ankle joint and thereby reduce the risk of developing arthritis following traumatic injury. In this study, brace geometry will be varied to determine how these changes influence the forces experienced by ankle cartilage. The proposed study will provide evidence that can be used by clinicians and researchers to design braces that most effectively reduce forces on ankle cartilage.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

About this study

The primary purpose of this line of research is to investigate the effects of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) design on the forces and contact stress at the ankle, with the goal of reducing the development of post traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) in the ankle. Research suggests that ankle arthritis develops, in part, due to increased contact stresses within the ankle joint following fracture. It is expected that reducing articular contact stress at the ankle has the potential to delay or prevent the development of PTOA. CDOs have been shown to significantly improve function following extremity injury, and show promise for offloading the injured limb after severe lower extremity injuries. Therefore, the proposed effort is designed to evaluate how different CDO design factors influence offloading and therefore the reduction of forces and articular contact stress at the ankle.

Adult participants will be evaluated while wearing carbon fiber braces of varied geometry. The primary dependent measure is ankle joint contact stress. Following consent and enrollment computerized tomography (CT) images will be used to determine the geometry of the joint articular surfaces. Ankle contact stress will be calculated using discrete element analysis and biomechanical data collected in subsequent data collection.

Participants will be cast and fit for three CDOs with varied geometry. Participants will be blinded to the design variation of each device and will only know them as CDO-A, CDO-B, or CDO-C. Testing will be completed under 4 conditions: No-CDO, CDO-A, CDO-B, CDO-C, with each bracing condition (A/B/C) representing a CDO design variant. Physical performance measures will incorporate tests of agility, speed, and lower limb power to ensure that changes to device design do not negatively affect physical function. Questionnaires will be used to evaluate participants' current and desired activity level, pain with and without CDO use, satisfaction with the devices, perception of comfort and smoothness between devices, and preference between CDOs. Semi-structured interviews will be completed to fully capture the participant's perspective. Lower limb forces and motion will be assessed using a computerized motion capture system and force plates in the floor. Forces between the foot and CDO will be measured using force sensing insoles, and muscle activity data will be collected using surface electromyography. Devices will be mechanically tested, and participant demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

TIBIAL PILON FRACTURE PARTICIPANTS:

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages: 18-65
  • Sustained unilateral fracture of the tibial pilon within the preceding 5 years
  • The fracture has completely healed
  • Ability to walk 50 feet without use of an assistive device (cane, crutch, etc.)
  • Ability to walk at a slow to moderate pace
  • Shoe size between women's 8 and 13.5 or men's 6.5 and 13
  • Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent
  • Individuals with elevated contact stress according to model generated using PedCAT standing CT images (will be answered after completing visit one)

Exclusion criteria

  • Pain > 6/10 while walking
  • Increase in pain during testing of 3/10 or greater
  • Neurologic, musculoskeletal (including bilateral fractures) or other condition limiting function of the contralateral extremity
  • Medical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (ex. moderate or severe brain injury, stroke, heart disease)
  • Wounds to the calf that would prevent CDO fitting
  • Fractures secondary to neuropathy or severe osteopenia
  • Classification as non-ambulatory
  • Previous fractures near the tibial pilon on the involved limb
  • Surgery on involved limb anticipated in the next 6 months
  • Requirement of a knee stabilizing device (i.e. KAFO, KO…) to perform daily activities
  • Visual or hearing impairments that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
  • BMI greater than 40
  • Pregnancy- Per participant self-report. Due to the expected small number of pregnant individuals and resulting inability to account for its effect on resulting outcomes, participants will be withdrawn from the study.

HEALTHY ABLE-BODIED PARTICIPANTS:

Patient Inclusion Criteria

  • Between the ages of 18 and 65
  • Shoe size between women's 8 and 13.5 or men's 6.5 and 13
  • Healthy individuals without a current complaint of lower extremity pain, spine pain, or medical or neuromusculoskeletal disorders that have limited participation in work or exercise in the last 6 months
  • Full active range of motion of the bilateral lower extremities and spine
  • Ability to hop without pain
  • Ability to perform a full squat without pain
  • Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent

Patient Exclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed moderate or severe brain injury
  • Prior lower extremity injury resulting in surgery or limiting function for greater than 6 weeks
  • Diagnosis of a physical or psychological condition that would preclude testing (e.g. cardiac condition, clotting disorder, pulmonary condition)
  • Visual or hearing impairment that would interfere with instructions given during testing
  • Require an assistive device
  • Wounds to the foot or calf that would prevent CDO use
  • BMI greater than 40
  • Pregnancy - Per participant self-report. Due to the expected small number of pregnant individuals and resulting inability to account for its effect on resulting outcomes, participants will be withdrawn from the study

Treatment and study plan

Custom Carbon Fiber Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Device

The custom carbon fiber dynamic orthoses will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.

Other names: Ankle Foot Orthosis

Primary outcomes

  1. Joint Contact Stress Time Exposure (Model Estimated)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Joint contact stress time exposure (MPA-s/gait cycle) was estimated using a participant specific musculoskeletal model. Peak joint contact stress time exposure (MPA-s/gait cycle) acting on the tibia during the gait cycle were reported. Lower peak contact stress time exposure is considered a better outcome.

  2. Peak Plantar Force (Total Foot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar forces normalized to body weight (N/kg) will be measured across the forefoot (100% of sensor) and normalized to participant body weight as they walk.

  3. Peak Plantar Force (Hindfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar forces normalized to body weight (N/kg) will be measured across the forefoot (proximal 30% of sensor) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

  4. Peak Plantar Force (Midfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar forces normalized to body weight (N/kg) will be measured across the forefoot (middle 30% of sensor) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

  5. Peak Plantar Force (Forefoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar forces normalized to body weight (N/kg) will be measured across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

  6. Plantar Force Impulse (Total Foot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse normalized to body weight (Ns/kg) across the forefoot (100% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase and normalized to participant body weight as they walk.

  7. Plantar Force Impulse (Hindfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse normalized to body weight (Ns/kg) across the forefoot (proximal 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

  8. Plantar Force Impulse (Midfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse normalized to body weight (Ns/kg) across the forefoot (middle 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

  9. Plantar Force Impulse (Forefoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse normalized to body weight (Ns/kg) across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk without a CDO and with each CDO.

  10. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (Before Performance Measures - 4SST, 5STS)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. Lower values are better as they indicate less pain.

  11. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (After Performance Measures - 4SST, 5STS)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. Lower values are better as they indicate less pain

  12. Participant Device Preference (Rank Order NoCDO, CDOA, CDOB, CDOC)

    Time frame: Baseline

    The participant will rank order their preference for their standard of care device (if applicable), No Device, CDO-A, CDO-B, CDO-C on a questionnaire.

  13. Participant Device Preference (First Preferred Condition)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Participants were asked to rank order their preference for NoCDO, CDO-A, CDO-B, CDO-C on a questionnaire.

  14. Participant Device Preference (Second Preferred Condition)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Participants were asked to rank order the testing conditions from the condition they would most prefer to walk in everyday (first preferred) to the condition they would least prefer to walk in everyday (fourth preferred).

  15. Participant Device Preference (Third Preferred Condition)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Participants were asked to rank order the testing conditions from the condition they would most prefer to walk in everyday (first preferred) to the condition they would least prefer to walk in everyday (fourth preferred).

  16. Participant Device Preference (Fourth Preferred Condition)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Participants were asked to rank order the testing conditions from the condition they would most prefer to walk in everyday (first preferred) to the condition they would least prefer to walk in everyday (fourth preferred).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peak Soleus Muscle Force (Model Estimated)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Peak soleus muscle force (N) during gait was estimated using a participant specific musculoskeletal model.

  2. Peak Gastrocnemius Muscle Force (Model Estimated)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Peak gastrocnemius muscle force (N) during gait was estimated using a participant specific musculoskeletal model.

  3. Ankle Range of Motion

    Time frame: Baseline

    Peak ankle dorsiflexion (degrees) during gait.

  4. Peak Ankle Moment

    Time frame: Baseline

    Peak ankle plantarflexion moment (Nm/kg) during gait.

  5. Peak Ankle Power

    Time frame: Baseline

    Peak ankle push-off power (W/kg) during gait.

  6. Four Square Step Test (4SST)

    Time frame: Baseline

    The 4SST (s) is a standardized timed test of balance and agility. One inch pipe is placed on the floor in the shape of a Maltese cross and participants are instructed to begin in the back left quadrant then to move 1) forward, 2) sideways right, 3) backward, then 4) sideways left, then to move in the reverse direction back to the original square.

  7. Sit to Stand 5 Times (STS5)

    Time frame: Baseline

    STS5 (s) is a well-established timed measure of lower limb muscle strength and power. Participants are instructed to start the test sitting with their arms folded across their chest and with their back against a standard chair. Patients are then instructed to stand up and sit down 5 times as fast as possible, avoiding touching their back to the chair during each repetition. The time to complete all five continuous repetitions is reported.

  8. The Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Satisfaction with device will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Device Score (11-55). Lower scores indicate a better outcome.

  9. Modified Socket Comfort Score (Comfort)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable. Higher scores are better as they indicate a more comfortable device.

  10. Modified Socket Comfort Score (Smoothness)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Comfort scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth. Higher scores are better as they indicate a smoother rollover with the device.

Other outcomes

  1. Semi-Structured Interview

    Time frame: Baseline

    Semi-structured interviews will also be used to fully capture the patients' perspectives, experience, and opinions associated with the device options they experienced as part of the study.

  2. Center of Pressure Velocity Timing

    Time frame: Baseline

    Timing of peak center of pressure velocity (percent stance) during gait.

  3. Center of Pressure Velocity Magnitude

    Time frame: Baseline

    Magnitude of peak center of pressure velocity (m/s) during gait.

  4. Soleus Muscle Activity (Electromyography)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the soleus during gait.

  5. Tibialis Anterior Muscle Activity (Electromyography)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of theTibialis Anterior during gait.

  6. Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle Activity (Electromyography)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the Medial Gastrocnemius during gait.

  7. Rectus Femoris Muscle Activity (Electromyography)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the Rectus Femoris during gait.

  8. Vastus Medialis Muscle Activity (Electromyography)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the Vastus Medialis during gait.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Iowa

Other

Collaborators

  • Bio-Mechanical Composites
  • Fabtech Systems
  • University of Delaware

Registry information

Acronym: PRMRP-FPA2

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 24, 2020
Registry last updated
Jan 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.