Functional orthosis
DeviceSee arm descriptions
NCT Number: NCT05412693
Stability dictates treatment choice for trans-syndesmotic fibula fractures. Optimal treatment for partially unstable fractures remains a topic of debate. The purpose of this study is to evaluate possible outcome non-inferior of functional orthosis treatment versus cast immobilization for these fractures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Østfold Hospital Trust, Sarpsborg, Østfold fylke, Norway
Evidence suggests that Weber B ankle fractures should be treated nonoperatively if the ankle mortise is stable. Stability is maintained if the deltoid ligament is intact, also known as a Weber B/SER2 injury. Functional orthosis treatment is advised for these injuries. Recently, authors have demonstrated that the fractured ankle can be functionally stable even with a partial deltoid ligament injury. Our interpretation of a partial deltoid ligament injury is when weightbearing radiographs indicate stability (no increase in medial clear space), while concomitant gravity stress radiographs indicate instability (due to increase in medial clear space). It is suggested that this is referred to as a Weber B/SER4a injury. Although now considered for nonoperative treatment, partially unstable/SER4a injuries were traditionally treated operatively. Today, the superiority of one method of nonoperative treatment over another for partially unstable/SER4a injuries remains unclear. Some authors advocate cast immobilization while others have shown good outcomes after inconsistently using different orthoses and cast devices. The argument for cast immobilization appears to be a fear of posttraumatic osteoarthritis because of potential recurrent instability. As a result, cast immobilization of partially unstable/SER4a fractures is implemented in reference European guidelines, and thus must be considered the reference treatment. To our knowledge, no study has documented increased prevalence of osteoarthritis associated with functional treatment of partially unstable/SER4a fractures. The use of cast immobilization remains a precautionary principle, but the choice is not so clear cut because cast immobilization comes with an increased risk of joint stiffness and thromboembolic complications. Long-term radiographic and patient-reported outcome data evaluating possible non-inferiority of functional orthosis treatment compared to cast immobilization will assist in guiding future treatment strategies of these common fractures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
See arm descriptions
See arm descriptions
Time frame: 2 years
Scale 0-100, lower scores indicate less pain and symptoms.
Time frame: 2 years
Scale 0-100, higher scores indicate less pain and symptoms.
Time frame: 6 weeks
A 0-10 rating scale for perceived satisfaction with orthosis or cast
Time frame: 2 years
Measurement of ankle medial clear space from weightbearing and gravity stress ankle radiographs
Time frame: 2 years
Registration of possible loss of congruence, delayed union, non-union, thromboembolic events
Time frame: 6 weeks, 2 years
Measurement using a goniometer (ad modum Lindsjø)
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Other
Six Weeks Functional Orthosis Versus Cast Immobilization for Partially Unstable Weber B/SER4a Ankle Fractures - a Multicenter Randomized Non-inferiority Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05662449
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Aberdeen, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05494645
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03809520
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06599554
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Bologna, Italy
View Trial Details