The University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
NCT Number: NCT04800510
The proposed study evaluates the effect of carbon fiber brace design on forces across the ankle joint. It is expected that carbon fiber braces can be designed to reduce forces in the ankle. In this study, brace geometry will be varied to determine how these changes influence the forces experienced by ankle cartilage. The purpose of this study is to refine a pre-existing musculoskeletal model and finalize the procedures for inputting multiple data sources into the model to evaluate ankle articular contact stresses.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
The purpose of this study is to refine a pre-existing musculoskeletal model and finalize the procedures for inputting multiple data sources into the model to evaluate ankle articular contact stresses.
Healthy adult participants will complete testing using three generic sized carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) and with no CDO. Participants will be blinded to the design variation of each device and will only know them as CDO-A, CDO-B, or CDO-C. Testing will be completed under 4 conditions: No-CDO, CDO-A, CDO-B, CDO-C, with each bracing condition (A/B/C) representing a CDO design variant. Physical performance measures will incorporate tests of agility, speed, and lower limb power to ensure that changes to device design do not negatively affect physical function. Questionnaires will be used to evaluate participants' current and desired activity level, pain with and without CDO use, satisfaction with the devices, perception of comfort and smoothness between devices, and preference between CDOs. Semi-structured interviews will be completed to fully capture the participant's perspective. Lower limb forces and motion will be assessed using a computerized motion capture system and force plates in the floor. Forces between the foot and CDO will be measured using force sensing insoles, and muscle activity data will be collected using surface electromyography. Devices will be mechanically tested, and participant demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded.
The information obtained from this study will help refine the musculoskeletal model data input methods to be used in future studies. The knowledge that will be gained from this investigation has the potential to substantially improve the long-term efficacy and efficiency of the musculoskeletal model and help improve ankle foot orthosis
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The CDO will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.
Other names: Ankle Foot Orthosis
Time frame: Baseline
Joint contact stress-time exposure (MPA-s/gait cycle) will be estimated using a participant specific musculoskeletal model. The model included surface geometry of each participants tibia and talus. Contact stress -time exposure, measured in MPa-s, was calculated at 13 points across the gait cycle. Higher values indicate greater contact stress-time exposure.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak dorsiflexion angle (degrees) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak ankle moment (Nm/kg) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak ankle power (W/kg) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Force data (N) collected across the total foot measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Force data (N) collected across the forefoot (distal 40% of insole) measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Force data (N) collected across the midfoot (middle 30% of insole) measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Force data (N) collected across the hindfoot (proximal 30% of insole) measured between the foot and orthosis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
The 4SST (s) is a standardized timed test of balance and agility.
Time frame: Baseline
STS5 (s) is a well-established timed measure of lower limb muscle strength and power. Participants are instructed to stand up and sit down 5 times as fast as possible.
Time frame: Baseline
Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline
Satisfaction with device will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Device Score. The survey asks users to indicate how much they agree with each statement on a scale from - Strongly Agree (5) to Strongly Disagree (0) with a Don't Know/Not Applicable option. The average score across all questions was calculated and reported, larger scores indicate a better outcome associated with that device. The maximum possible score is a 5 and the minimum possible score is a 0.
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Soleus muscle forces (N) will be estimated using an Opensim model
Time frame: Baseline
Peak Gastrocnemius muscle forces (N) will be estimated using an OpenSim model
Time frame: Baseline
Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable.
Time frame: Baseline
Comfort scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth.
Time frame: Baseline
The participant will rank order their preference for their standard of care device (if applicable), No Device, CDO-A, CDO-B, CDO-C on a questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline
Semi-structured interviews will also be used to fully capture the patients' perspectives, experience, and opinions associated with the device options they experienced as part of the study.
Time frame: Baseline
Timing of peak center of pressure velocity (percent stance) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Magnitude of peak center of pressure velocity (m/s) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the Soleus during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the Rectus Femoris during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the Vastus Medialis during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the Medial Gastrocnemius during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Electromyography (EMG, % Maximum) of the Tibialis Anterior during gait.
University of Iowa
Other
Iterative Design of Custom Dynamic Orthoses and Comprehensive Design of Musculoskeletal Model
Acronym: PRMRP-Norms
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05090956
Adult ALL, Healthy
Toulouse, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04646304
Adult ALL, Healthy
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05209360
Adult ALL, Arthritis
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04806100
Adult ALL, Healthy
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial Details