Diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic TestUltrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging
NCT Number: NCT04477824
This study aims to investigate the use of preoperative diagnostic imaging before appendectomy in Denmark and whether it has changed over time during the period from 2000-15. Secondly, the study aims to investigate regional, age and gender differences in the same setting.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of abdominal pain (1) and appendectomy is the most common emergency surgical procedure performed worldwide (2). During the last decades, there has been a paradigm shift in both diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis - surgical treatment has changed from open to laparoscopic appendectomy (3). Acute appendicitis has traditionally been a clinical diagnosis, but the use of preoperative diagnostic imaging has, in some countries, increased dramatically (4). The use of computed tomography (CT) before appendectomy is in the United States up to 90%, in England 13% and in Holland almost all patients undergo ultrasound and/or CT before appendectomy (1).
The use of antibiotics can be successful in the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis verified on CT, and the use of CT has significantly lowered the negative appendectomy rate compared to clinical evaluation only (1). But the use of CT is inevitably inducing radiation and increasing lifetime risk of cancer - especially in younger patients who most frequently present with acute appendicitis (1,5). It is estimated that CT of the abdominal region can avoid 12 negative appendectomies but at the cost of one cancer death due to radiation (5). In Denmark surgery is still the only treatment for appendicitis, but how is appendicitis diagnosed? Is acute appendicitis still a clinical diagnosis?
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 24 hours
Annual percentage use of abdominal ultrasonography, abdominal computerized tomography (with or without contrast) and abdominal MRI 24 hours before appendectomy for appendicitis.
Time frame: 24 hours
Differences in use of ultrasonography between gender, age groups divided into decades and the five Danish administrative regions.
Time frame: 24 hours
Differences in use of abdominal computerized tomography (with or without contrast) between gender, age groups divided into decades and the five Danish administrative regions.
Time frame: 24 hours
Differences in use of magnetic resonance imaging between gender, age groups divided into decades and the five Danish administrative regions.
Claus Anders Bertelsen, PhD, MD
Other
Is Acute Appendicitis Still a Clinical Diagnosis? Use of Preoperative Diagnostic Imaging Before Appendectomy in Denmark During 2000-15.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05002829
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05887414
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Baldwin Park, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05209061
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04986397
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details