Baseline
OtherMeasure Ottawa Decisional Regret at baseline when patients receive a diagnosis of appendicitis.
NCT Number: NCT05887414
While appendectomy has been the main treatment of appendicitis for over 100 years, recent European studies found that, at least among highly selected patients, antibiotics alone can be an effective alternative. Surgeons and patients alike have a difficult time deciding if surgery or antibiotics are the best choice to treat appendicitis. The goal of the TRIAD is to evaluate the patients who are a part of the TRIAD implementation program and assess satisfaction and decisional regret for patients with appendicitis. This information will be used to inform the design of decision-support interventions to help patients improve their ability to make an informed decision in-line with their preferences and values.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Kaiser Permanente Baldwin Park, Baldwin Park, California, United States
TRIAD Patient Surveys is a cross-sectional survey design that will lead to more informed decision making and better outcomes related to antibiotics for appendicitis.
TRIAD was developed from questions raised by the University of Washington CODA Trial that addressed many of the methodological issues in the European studies and included diverse, adult patients (n=1552) with almost all types of presentations of appendicitis.
TRIAD surveys will be carried out in clinics and hospitals across the United States. Patients who are diagnosed with appendicitis will be recruited for study participation regardless of which treatment (appendectomy or antibiotics) they receive. Investigators invite patients to participate in a survey designed to identify awareness of treatment options and levels of decisional conflict (measured with the Ottawa Decisional Conflict Score [DCS]). Participants will complete a baseline survey via a convenient electronic platform, and follow-up surveys will be sent at 30 days.
By implementing the TRIAD surveys, researchers hope to obtain a better understanding of patients' perspectives, knowledge, and decision-making processes regarding the choice between appendectomy and antibiotic treatment for appendicitis. This data can contribute to more informed decision-making and potentially improve outcomes related to antibiotic use for this condition.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Measure Ottawa Decisional Regret at baseline when patients receive a diagnosis of appendicitis.
Measure Ottawa Decisional Regret after 30 days.
Time frame: 3 years
Ottawa Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) measures personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options; modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty; and effective decision making
University of Washington
Other
Treatment Individualized Appendicitis Decision-Making (TRIAD) Patient Surveys
Acronym: TRIAD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05002829
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05209061
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04986397
Appendicitis, Cecal Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04614519
Appendectomy, Appendicitis
Nice, France
View Trial Details