Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04713683

Investigation of Nickel Sensitization After Percutaneous Implantation of Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder

Percutaneous PFO closure has been established as a first-line therapy for preventing recurrent strokes in selected patients. The devices used for the specific purpose contain and release nickel, which is considered as the most allergen metal in nature. Skin patch tests are considered as gold-standard for documenting nickel allergy. While the allergic contact dermatitis induced by nickel is well described, literature is inadequate on explaining the effect of nickel release on the clinical manifestations of patients implanted with such devices.

Our prospective, randomized, blinded trial will try to investigate the above by performing nickel skin patch tests to all patients, 14 days before and 90 days after the implantation. During follow-up, clinical manifestations and transthoracic echocardiographic findings will be evaluated and associated with patch skin tests.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

14 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens

Athens, Attica, 115 28, Greece

About this study

Percutaneous PFO closure has been established as a first-line therapy for preventing recurrent strokes, after embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) and a patent foramen ovale. The PFO closure is achieved by the implantation of suitable devices, which occlude the shunt between the two atria and prevent the creation and detachment of thrombi. Until today, there are two devices approved by FDA for the specific purpose; Amplatzer PFO Occluder and Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder. Despite the architectonic differences between these devices, the main material of both is nitinol, an alloy of nickel and titanium. While titanium is an extremely rare allergen, nickel is considered as one of the most common allergens and the most frequent metal allergen in nature, with a prevalence about 20%. The main clinical expression of nickel hypersensitivity is allergic contact dermatitis, but cases with systemic allergic reaction have been described as well. It has been observed that nickel is released by the implanted devices and circulates through bloodstream, having the potential to cause systemic clinical picture. Device syndrome includes signs and symptoms (i.e. palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain, rash, etc.), which are appeared after the device placement and are associated with hypersensitivity reaction. The existing literature is considered as inadequate for explaining the effect of nickel release in the patients implanted with an occluder.

The aim of our study is to evaluate whether patients with nickel hypersensitivity have an increased risk of adverse events following PFO closure, to assess the potential influence of device selection, and to evaluate potential sensitization or desensitization in patients without or with pre-existing nickel allergy, respectively.

Nickel hypersensitivity was assessed using skin patch testing prior to the procedure. The primary endpoint was device syndrome, a composite of patient-reported symptoms (chest pain, palpitations, migraines, dyspnea, and rash). Secondary endpoints included arrhythmias, bleeding, stroke, and all-cause mortality.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: at least 14 years old
  • Well-documented indication for percutaneous PFO closure

Exclusion criteria

  • Corticosteroid treatment
  • Patient's refusal to participation

Treatment and study plan

Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Device

Patients with well-documented embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) and a patent foramen ovale (PFO) are indicated for percutaneous closure of PFO. The intervention is performed through the right femoral vein. The interventional cardiologist introduces the sheath and advances the device via inferior vena cava to right atrium. Then, the catheter is passed through the PFO, the device is deployed and the occlusion is achieved. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopy guidance with or without transesophageal echocardiography guidance.

Other names: Transcatheter PFO occlusion

Primary outcomes

  1. Device syndrome, a composite endpoint consisting of patient-reported new-onset chest pain, palpitations, new-onset or worsening migraines, dyspnea, and rash

    Time frame: The first 90 days after the procedure

    Clinical signs and symptoms during the first 90 days after the procedure will be evaluated through a questionnaire.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The nickel patch tests' results change after Amplatzer Device implantation

    Time frame: The first 90 days after the procedure

    Investigating the number of patients received Amplatzer device, who developed nickel sensitization.

  2. The nickel patch tests' results change after Gore Device implantation

    Time frame: The first 90 days after the procedure

    Investigating the number of patients received Gore device, who developed nickel sensitization.

  3. Residual interatrial leakage

    Time frame: 90 days after the procedure

    Evaluation of residual interatrial leakage, by performing transthoracic echocardiography

  4. Rest allergens skin patch test results' change

    Time frame: 90 days after the procedure

    The possible change (either as continuous or dichotomous outcome) of rest allergen skin patch test, after the device implantation

  5. Nickel patch test results' change

    Time frame: 90 days after the procedure

    The possible change (either as continuous or dichotomous outcome) of nickel skin patch test, after the device implantation

  6. patient-reported new-onset chest pain

    Time frame: 90 days after the procedure

    patient-reported new-onset chest pain

  7. palpitations

    Time frame: 90 days after the procedure

    as described by the patients

  8. new-onset or worsening migraines

    Time frame: 90 days after the procedure

    as described by the patients

  9. dyspnea

    Time frame: 90 days after the procedure

    as described by the patients

  10. Atrial arrhythmias

    Time frame: 90 days after the procedure

    as described by the patients

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Investigation of Nickel Sensitization After Percutaneous Implantation of Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder; a RandomizEd Trial.

Acronym: INSPIRE

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 19, 2021
Registry last updated
Feb 6, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.