First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens
Athens, Attica, 115 28, Greece
NCT Number: NCT04713683
Percutaneous PFO closure has been established as a first-line therapy for preventing recurrent strokes in selected patients. The devices used for the specific purpose contain and release nickel, which is considered as the most allergen metal in nature. Skin patch tests are considered as gold-standard for documenting nickel allergy. While the allergic contact dermatitis induced by nickel is well described, literature is inadequate on explaining the effect of nickel release on the clinical manifestations of patients implanted with such devices.
Our prospective, randomized, blinded trial will try to investigate the above by performing nickel skin patch tests to all patients, 14 days before and 90 days after the implantation. During follow-up, clinical manifestations and transthoracic echocardiographic findings will be evaluated and associated with patch skin tests.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me14 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Athens, Attica, 115 28, Greece
Percutaneous PFO closure has been established as a first-line therapy for preventing recurrent strokes, after embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) and a patent foramen ovale. The PFO closure is achieved by the implantation of suitable devices, which occlude the shunt between the two atria and prevent the creation and detachment of thrombi. Until today, there are two devices approved by FDA for the specific purpose; Amplatzer PFO Occluder and Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder. Despite the architectonic differences between these devices, the main material of both is nitinol, an alloy of nickel and titanium. While titanium is an extremely rare allergen, nickel is considered as one of the most common allergens and the most frequent metal allergen in nature, with a prevalence about 20%. The main clinical expression of nickel hypersensitivity is allergic contact dermatitis, but cases with systemic allergic reaction have been described as well. It has been observed that nickel is released by the implanted devices and circulates through bloodstream, having the potential to cause systemic clinical picture. Device syndrome includes signs and symptoms (i.e. palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain, rash, etc.), which are appeared after the device placement and are associated with hypersensitivity reaction. The existing literature is considered as inadequate for explaining the effect of nickel release in the patients implanted with an occluder.
The aim of our study is to evaluate whether patients with nickel hypersensitivity have an increased risk of adverse events following PFO closure, to assess the potential influence of device selection, and to evaluate potential sensitization or desensitization in patients without or with pre-existing nickel allergy, respectively.
Nickel hypersensitivity was assessed using skin patch testing prior to the procedure. The primary endpoint was device syndrome, a composite of patient-reported symptoms (chest pain, palpitations, migraines, dyspnea, and rash). Secondary endpoints included arrhythmias, bleeding, stroke, and all-cause mortality.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients with well-documented embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) and a patent foramen ovale (PFO) are indicated for percutaneous closure of PFO. The intervention is performed through the right femoral vein. The interventional cardiologist introduces the sheath and advances the device via inferior vena cava to right atrium. Then, the catheter is passed through the PFO, the device is deployed and the occlusion is achieved. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopy guidance with or without transesophageal echocardiography guidance.
Other names: Transcatheter PFO occlusion
Time frame: The first 90 days after the procedure
Clinical signs and symptoms during the first 90 days after the procedure will be evaluated through a questionnaire.
Time frame: The first 90 days after the procedure
Investigating the number of patients received Amplatzer device, who developed nickel sensitization.
Time frame: The first 90 days after the procedure
Investigating the number of patients received Gore device, who developed nickel sensitization.
Time frame: 90 days after the procedure
Evaluation of residual interatrial leakage, by performing transthoracic echocardiography
Time frame: 90 days after the procedure
The possible change (either as continuous or dichotomous outcome) of rest allergen skin patch test, after the device implantation
Time frame: 90 days after the procedure
The possible change (either as continuous or dichotomous outcome) of nickel skin patch test, after the device implantation
Time frame: 90 days after the procedure
patient-reported new-onset chest pain
Time frame: 90 days after the procedure
as described by the patients
Time frame: 90 days after the procedure
as described by the patients
Time frame: 90 days after the procedure
as described by the patients
Time frame: 90 days after the procedure
as described by the patients
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Other
Investigation of Nickel Sensitization After Percutaneous Implantation of Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder; a RandomizEd Trial.
Acronym: INSPIRE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02432131
Barotrauma, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT02957201
Atrial Septal Defect, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT02400892
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02127294
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Changchun, Jilin, China
View Trial Details