Intubation During Resuscitation

The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of four intubation devices ( in a cardiopulmonary scenario with uninterrupted chest compressions with a standardized manikin model.

The investigators hypothesized that fiberoscope laryngoscopes may improve success rates.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Intubation Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

Devices using in study:

The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope (BONFILS)(KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA), The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope (RIFL)( AI Medical Devices, Inc., Williamston, MI, USA), The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope Blade Mac#3(C-MAC®S) (KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA) The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade no. 3 (MAC) (LifeLine Medical, Inc., Brooksville, FL, USA).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

experienced emergency personnel: nurses, paramedics

Exclusion criteria

no experience in out-of-hospital emergency medicine

Treatment and study plan

The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope

Device

Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.

The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope

Device

Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.

The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope

Device

Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.

the Macintosh laryngoscope

Device

Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.

Primary outcomes

Time to successful intubation

Time frame: Subjects complete study in 1 day

The devices to be compared include (1) The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope , (2) the Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope, (3) the C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope, (4) the Macintosh Laryngoscope. Successful intubation will be measured in the seconds from insertion of an intubation device to the first manual ventilation of the mannequin's lungs.
Success rate of ETI

Time frame: Subjects complete study in 1 day

The devices to be compared include (1) The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope , (2) the Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope, (3) the C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope, (4) the Macintosh Laryngoscope. Successful intubation will be measured in the seconds from insertion of an intubation device to the first manual ventilation of the mannequin's lungs.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Four Types of Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation During Chest Compressions

Acronym: IDR

Important dates

Study start: 2014
Primary completion: 2014
Study completion: 2014
First posted: Oct 29, 2014
Registry last updated: Oct 29, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed