The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong
NCT Number: NCT01508884
Despite the WHO International Health Regulations Emergency Committee declared an end to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic globally, the emergence of the novel 2009 H1N1 virus in March 2009 has affected more than 214 countries with at least 18000 deaths [1]. Patients with chronic underlying illness and extreme of ages are at risk of developing severe disease and complications [2-3]. Resistance to oseltamivir has also been reported [4]. Therefore, vaccination with the 2010/2011 trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) with the 2009 H1N1-like virus incorporated will be the best protection against the influenza infection, especially among the at risk population. Recent study on dose sparing seasonal influenza vaccine delivered via a novel intradermal microneedle has demonstrated good immunogenic responses similar to full-dose intramuscular vaccination [6]. Poor immunogenicity of the H1N1 2009 component of the trivalent influenza has been reported [7].
Study has also suggested the combined intradermal vaccination with local stimulation of dermal antigen presenting cells by applying imiquimod cream (Aldara) to the injection site, which activate antigen presenting cells (APC) through the toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) may produce better immunogenicity [8].
Imiquimod cream is currently registered for the treatment of warts and basal cell carcinoma. Scientific evidence has demonstrated that after treatment with imiquimod, the antigen is processed and presented to cells of the adaptive immune system leading to clearance of the virus and subsequent clearance of the lesions [9]. In addition to functional maturation, imiquimod induces migration of dendritic cells from the dermis to draining lymph nodes [10,11]. Subcutaneous administration of imiquimod as vaccine adjuvant simultaneously with the antigen of interest, has shown to induce enhanced responses towards the administered antigen [12].
We therefore performed a prospective, double blind, randomized controlled study to compare the safety and immunogenicity between intradermal 2011/2012 TIV immunization with pretreatment of imiquimod cream and conventional full dose intramuscular 2011/2012 TIV immunization with pretreatment of aqueous cream as control.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hong Kong
References
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
single dose of intradermal 15 mcg non-adjuvanted 2011/2012 trivalent influenza vaccine
Other names: Intanza 15
pretreatment with topical imiquimod cream to the injection site before vaccination
Other names: Aldara
pretreatment with topical aqueous cream to the injection site before vaccination
Time frame: day 7
The percentage of subjects with an hemagglutination inhibition antibody titre <10 at baseline and a post-vaccination titre of ≥40 or a titre >10 at baseline and at least a four-fold increase in titre post-vaccination on day 7
Time frame: day 21
The GMT fold increase in influenza antibody titer by hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization antibody assays on day 21 compared to day 0
Time frame: day 21
The percentage of subjects achieving an antibody titer achieving an influenza antibody titer of 1:40 or above by hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization antibody assay on day 21
Time frame: 30 minutes after vaccination
Patients who develop systemic or local adverse events within 30 minutes of vaccination
Time frame: day 7
The GMT fold increase in influenza antibody titer by hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization antibody assay on day 7 compared to day 0
Time frame: day 7
The percentage of subjects achieving an antibody titer achieving an influenza antibody titer of 1:40 or above by hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization antibody assay on day 7
Time frame: year 1
The GMT fold increase in influenza antibody titer by hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization antibody assay at year 1 compared to day 0
Time frame: year 1
The percentage of subjects achieving an antibody titer achieving an influenza antibody titer of 1:40 or above by hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization antibody assay at year 1
Time frame: Year 1
The percentage of subjects with an hemagglutination inhibition antibody titre <10 at baseline and a post-vaccination titre of ≥40 or a titre >10 at baseline and at least a four-fold increase in titre post-vaccination at year 1
Time frame: 7 days after vaccination
Patients who develop systemic or local adverse events within 1 week of vaccination
Time frame: Day 21
The percentage of subjects with an hemagglutination inhibition antibody titre <10 at baseline and a post-vaccination titre of ≥40 or a titre >10 at baseline and at least a four-fold increase in titre post-vaccination on day 21
Time frame: Day 14
The GMT fold increase in influenza antibody titer by hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization antibody assay at year 1 compared to day 0
Time frame: Day 14
The percentage of subjects achieving an antibody titer achieving an influenza antibody titer of 1:40 or above by hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization antibody assay at year 1
Time frame: Day 14
The percentage of subjects with an hemagglutination inhibition antibody titre <10 at baseline and a post-vaccination titre of ≥40 or a titre >10 at baseline and at least a four-fold increase in titre post-vaccination at year 1
Time frame: 1 year post vaccination
hospitalization for pneumonia or influenza
Time frame: 1 year post vaccination
Nasopharyngeal sample positive for influenza A
The University of Hong Kong
Other
Efficacy and Effectiveness of Intradermal Trivalent Influenza Vaccine With Topical Imiquimod, a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06270875
Chronic Disease, Chronic Illness
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04915079
Behavior, Bias, Racial
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05866705
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01480765
Chronic Disease, Chronic Illness
London, United Kingdom
View Trial Details