Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06270875

Addressing Pain Through Navigator-Led Palliative Care Optimized for Heart Failure (ADAPT-HF)

Using the MOST framework, factorial pilot design, and an iterative, community-based process, the purpose of this study is to pilot test to further develop and refine a palliative care (PC) intervention addressing pain of Black adults (age > 18) with advanced HF. Thirty-six persons with advancing heart failure (HF) will be randomized to receive one of 16 conditions (different combinations of navigator coach-delivered PC pain intervention components).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

About this study

Developing culturally-responsive, effective, efficient, and scalable and unpacking mechanisms of action of heart failure palliative care interventions have been identified a key research priorities by NIH, AHA, and others. To begin to answer questions of mechanism and efficiency, the study team explored the dose effect of ENABLE CHF-PC, a large phase III RCT that demonstrated small improvements in secondary outcomes of pain intensity and interference. These additional exploratory analyses showed that those with poor baseline QOL and high pain intensity who received a full intervention dose had improved outcomes.

However ENABLE CHF-PC and other HF PC studies included interventions designed to be delivered as a "bundled" package where all intervention participants received the same intervention at set times and dose, making it hard to assess which content or dose led to outcome change. To efficiently test multiple intervention components, doses, and intensity simultaneously requires innovative methods and frameworks, like the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Guided by the Total Pain Theory and ENABLE CHF-PC and other HF PC and pain interventions, the project team identified 4 intervention components (HF pain and PC education, relaxation training, COPE attitude and other coping skills, health-related communication) and spirituality and meaning making to be modified, adapted, and evaluated for inclusion in a new, lay navigator-led early palliative care pain telehealth intervention, ADAPT HF (ADdressing pain through A navigator led Palliative care opTimized for Heart Failure).

Aim 1: Using the innovative MOST framework, determine ADAPT HF components feasibility, acceptability, enrollment, retention, and completion rates in advanced HF patients (n=36) for 12 weeks. Feasibility: ≥80% of participants will adhere to and complete assigned intervention components and study-related assessments. Acceptability: Through post-intervention qualitative interviews and acceptability outcomes (acceptability of intervention measure and intervention appropriateness measure), the project team will elicit feedback on intervention components, experiences, and clinical trial procedures.

Aim 2: Explore the preliminary efficacy of ADAPT HF intervention components on outcomes at 12- and 24- weeks after baseline including a) pain interference & pain intensity (primary outcome) using PROMIS measures b) symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and c) mood using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and d) QOL using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Scale.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18
  • African American
  • Diagnosis of advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association Class II-IV or American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Stage C-D)
  • English speaking
  • Willing to participate
  • Primary residence in CAPC East South Central or West South Central regions* (Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas)
  • Self-endorses pain in the last month
  • Willing to participate in intervention and data collection

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <18
  • Not African American
  • Ineligible HF classification
  • Self-reported, untreated severe mental illness
  • Dementia
  • Active Suicidal Ideation
  • Active substance abuse
  • Uncorrected hearing loss
  • Unable to respond in English

Treatment and study plan

ADAPT HF

Behavioral

ADAPT is a multicomponent, lay palliative care coach-led or self-led supportive care intervention designed to improve pain of life in individuals with advanced heart failure. Participants will complete weekly sessions of the educational programs. This program includes the following modules: pain psychoeducation, self-care and relaxation tips, social support and communication, and spirituality and meaning coping. The sessions will either be self-guided or completed with a lay coach navigator.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Intervention Delivery and Data Collection

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

    Proportion of participants who complete assigned intervention components and study-related assessments.

  2. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    A 4-item measure of perceived intervention acceptability. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (Completely Disagree-Completely Agree). Minimum score is 4 and maximum is 20. Higher scores indicate a higher chance of acceptability. Lower scores indicate a lower chance of acceptability.

  3. PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

    Through PROMIS measures, we will explore reports on pain intensity. This includes a 3-item questionnaire on pain intensity and a 6-item question on pain interference over a week. Minimum score is 3 and the maximum score is 15. Higher values indicate higher pain intensity. Lower values indicate lower pain intensity.

  4. Pain Interference Scale Short Form 6b

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

    A 6-item self-reported measure of the consequences of pain on relevant aspects of a person's life and may include the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Minimum score is 6 and maximum score is 30. Higher scores indicate higher pain interference. Lower scores indicate lower pain interference.

  5. Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    A 4-items scale that measures implementation outcomes that are often considered "leading indicators" of implementation success. Minimum score is 4 and maximum score is 20. Higher scores indicated higher feasibility and lower scores indicate less feasibility.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESES-r)

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

    A 10-item measuring symptom burden. This tool measures symptom burden on the following domains: pain, tiredness, nausea, lack of appetite, shortness of breath, anxiety, depression, overall well-being and self-reported other problems. Minimum score is 0 and Maximum score is 100. Higher scores indicate more symptom burden. Lower scores indicate less symptom burden.

  2. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Short Form

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

    12 items total; Measures changes in the quality of life, 5 domains: physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference, and quality of life. Minimum score is 0 and Maximum score is 100. Higher scores indicated better quality of life. Lower scores indicate poorer quality of life.

  3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

    14 items total, 7 items measure anxiety (e.g., feeling tense, restless, worry), 7 items measure depressive symptoms (e.g., cheerfulness, feeling slowed down). Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. Higher scores indicate worse anxiety/depression. Lower scores indicate less depression and anxiety.

  4. PROMIS General Self-efficacy

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    4 items measure self-efficacy (managing problems or events); Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. Higher values indicates greater self-efficacy. Lower values indicate worse self-efficacy.

  5. Self-care of Heart Failure Index

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    22 items; a measure of self-care defined as a naturalistic decision making process. Minimum score is 0 and Maximum score is 100. Higher scores indicate greater self-care adequacy. Lower scores indicate worse self-care adequacy.

  6. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    12-items; 2-items; questionnaire to identify an individual's perceived level of social support with family, friends, and significant others. Minimum score is 12 and Maximum score is 84. Higher scores indicate greater perceived social support. Lower scores indicate lower perceived social support.

  7. Patient Activation Measure (PAM) Short Form

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    3-items; assesses patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management; not scored; categorical (disagree strongly- agree strongly.

  8. Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness / Spirituality (BMMRS) - 6-item subscale for Religious/Spiritual Coping + 1 overall Q

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    6-item subscale for Religious/Spiritual Coping + 1 overall Q 6-items; measure of religiousness/spirituality; Not scored; Categorical (A great deal- Not at all)

  9. Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10)

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    10-items; a unidimensional self-reported scale consisting measuring resilience. Minimum score is 0 and Maximum score is 100. Higher scores reflect great resilience Lower scores indicate worse resilience.

  10. Discrimination in Medical Settings Scale Scale

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    17-items; measure of racial discrimination, scored as a mean. Higher means indicate more reports of racial discrimination in health care. Lower scores indicates lower reports of racial discrimination in healthcare settings.

  11. Cost/Resource Utilization Form

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    5-items; Investigator-developed questions- 5 patient-report; 5 related to intervention delivery costs; not scored, more responses indicate receiving more healthcare services.

  12. SF Global Health Scale

    Time frame: Baseline & 12 weeks

    10-item scale measuring measure self-reported physical, mental and social health. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. Higher scores indicate better health. Lower scores indicate poorer health.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Addressing Pain Through Navigator-Led Palliative Care Optimized for Heart Failure

Acronym: ADAPT HF

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 21, 2024
Registry last updated
May 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.