Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06423183

Interprofessional Mindfulness Practices Advancing Cancer Teamwork

The purpose of the research is to understand if mindfulness team training can improve the well-being and teamwork in caring for oncology patients. This study will enroll healthcare professionals in oncology teams, including clinic nurses, nurse managers, medical assistants, social workers, technicians, patient navigators, advanced practice providers, and physicians at UW Madison. Participants will be on study for up to approximately 6 months.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UW Carbone Cancer Center

Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States

About this study

Aim 1: Determine the effect of resilience training on team resilience and well-being. The investigators test the hypothesis that resilience training provided to interprofessional oncology care teams will improve team resilience and individual well-being.

Aim 2: Determine the feasibility and acceptability of a resilience training on team resilience. The investigators test the hypothesis that resilience training is feasible and acceptable in interprofessional oncology care teams.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A care provider in an oncology clinic team (clinic nurse, nurse manager, medical assistant, technician, social worker, patient navigator, advanced practice provider, physician)

Exclusion criteria

  • Does not participate in patient care or support services

Treatment and study plan

A Mindful Approach to Building a Resilient Healthcare Workforce (RENEW)

Behavioral

Synchronous, 4-month intervention that teaches skills in mindfulness, stress management, and resilience as an individual and as a team. Sessions occur monthly and include a 1 hour in-person introductory session followed by 3 50-minute virtual sessions.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Teamwork Measure

    Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)

    4-item Edmondson's psychology safety scale is scored on a likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), where higher scores indicate higher psychology safety

  2. Number of Participants Who Attend Each Session

    Time frame: up to 3 months

    Session 1 baseline, session 2 at 1 month, session 3 at 2 months, session 4 at 3 months

  3. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    Time frame: up to 3 months

    AIM is a 4-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), where higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

  4. Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    Time frame: up to 3 months

    IAM is a 4-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), where higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.

  5. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    Time frame: up to 3 months

    FIM is a 4-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), where higher scores indicate greater feasibility.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Stress measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)

    PSS is a 10-item survey scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often) for a total possible range of scores from 0-40 where higher scores indicate higher perceived stress.

  2. Change in Burnout measured by Maslach Burnout Inventory

    Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)

    This is a 2-item survey scored from 0-6 where higher scores indicate increased burnout.

  3. Change in Resilience measured by Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 2)

    Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)

    CD-RISC 2 is a 2-item survey each scored on a 5 point likert scale from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all of the time), higher scores indicate increased resilience.

  4. Change in Well-being measured by Flourishing Index

    Time frame: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (3 months), follow up (6 months)

    Flourishing measure is a 12-item survey that measure well being in each of 6 domains: happiness and life satisfaction; mental and physical health; meaning and purpose; character and virtue; close social relationships; financial and material stability. Each domain is scored from 0 - 10 where higher numbers are indicative of increased well being.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Interprofessional Mindfulness Practices Advancing Cancer Teamwork (IMPACT Study)

Acronym: IMPACT

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 21, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 13, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.