Kristen Bing
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
NCT Number: NCT03411356
The primary aim of this study is to is to determine if intermittent fasting (IMF) is an effective dietary strategy for treatment of obesity. A 1 year randomized trial will be used to compare weight loss generated by IMF versus Daily Caloric Restriction (DCR). The targeted weekly energy deficit is designed to be similar (~30%) and a comprehensive behavioral support program will be provided to both groups. The primary outcome is weight change at the end of the 1 year intervention; follow up measures will also be obtained 6 months after completing the intervention. This study will provide robust data regarding weight loss effectiveness of IMF and will further our understanding of the impact of IMF on energy balance.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Restricting daily calorie intake is the primary dietary strategy currently used to treat obesity. However, this approach is not effective for all individuals. Further, adherence to daily caloric restriction (DCR) typically decreases over time and many individuals who lose weight with this strategy will regain. Thus, novel dietary interventions are needed to provide a broader range of treatment options. The objective of this proposal is to determine if intermittent fasting (IMF) is an effective dietary strategy for treatment of obesity. IMF is an alternative method of reducing energy intake (EI) which has gained lay popularity in recent years as a strategy for weight loss. Short-term studies suggest IMF produces 3-8% weight loss in individuals with overweight and obesity. However, few studies have compared IMF to DCR and no studies have evaluated whether IMF is an effective long-term (≥1 year) weight loss strategy. Data from an 8-week pilot study comparing IMF to DCR suggests IMF is safe, tolerable, and produces similar short-term weight loss. After 6 months of unsupervised follow-up, changes in body composition tended to be more favorable with IMF and almost twice as many IMF participants maintained a ≥5 kg weight loss. Thus, IMF may be a more effective dietary strategy for sustaining weight loss than DCR. However, longer-term data are needed and little is known about adherence to IMF or the impact of IMF on energy expenditure (EE). Short-term studies suggest adherence to IMF may be superior to DCR, however, energy intake (EI) was based on self-report which may have significant limitations. Pilot data suggests resting energy expenditure (REE) was preserved during IMF-induced weight loss, which could decrease risk for weight regain. However, the impact of IMF on other components of EE including physical activity (PA) is largely unexamined. The study design is a pragmatic randomized trial to compare weight loss generated by IMF vs DCR. The targeted weekly energy deficit will be equivalent: DCR will be prescribed a ~30% daily energy restriction and IMF will be prescribed a modified fast (~80% energy restriction) on 3 non-consecutive days per week. The hypothesis is that a weight loss program based on IMF as the primary dietary strategy will result in greater weight loss at 1 year compared to a program based on traditional DCR. The approach is innovative as the targeted energy deficit will be matched between groups and EI will be assessed objectively (using doubly-labeled water) to provide an accurate comparison of adherence. In addition, both intervention groups will receive guidelines-based behavioral support to compare IMF to the current standard of care (DCR) in a more robust fashion. This study is significant as it could identify an effective alternative dietary strategy to help more people achieve and sustain weight loss.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants in this group will be given a calorie goal designed to produce a 34.3% energy deficit from estimated baseline weight maintenance energy requirements. Participants in this group will also receive a 12 month comprehensive group-based behavioral weight loss program and will be instructed in specific strategies to support DCR. Randomized groups will meet separately. Participants in this group will also be asked to increase moderate intensity physical activity to a target of 300 minutes per week.
Participants in this group will be instructed to limit energy intake to 20% of estimated baseline energy requirements on three non-consecutive days per week, and to eat ad libitum the other 4 days per week. Participants in this group will also receive a 12 month comprehensive group based behavioral weight loss program and will be instructed in specific strategies to support IMF. Randomized groups will meet separately. Participants in this group will also be asked to increase moderate intensity physical activity to a target of 300 minutes per week.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 13, 26, 39, 52.
Body weight will be measured via clinic scale.
Time frame: Week 78.
Body weight will be measured via clinic scale. The 78 month time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up weight.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 26, 52, and 78.
Body composition will be assessed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 13, 26, 52, and 78.
Blood pressure will be measured with a sphygomanometer. The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 26, 52, and 78.
12 hour fasting blood sample for measurement of lipid profile.The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 26, 52, and 78.
12 hour fasting blood sample for measurement of insulin and glucose. Insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]) will be calculated as ([insulin] x [fasting glucose x 0.055]/22.5). The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 26, 52, and 78.
EI will be measured using the doubly-labeled water (DLW) intake-balance method. The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 13, 26, 52, and 78.
Dietary energy intake (kcals/day) will be measured with diet diaries. The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 13, 26, 52, and 78.
Dietary macronutrient intake will be measured with diet diaries. The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 13, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 39, 44, 48, 52
Adherence to prescribed diet will be assessed with a monthly questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 26, 52, and 78.
REE will be measured using indirect calorimetry. The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 26, 52, and 78.
TDEE will be measured using the doubly-labeled water (DLW) method. The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 13, 26, 52, and 78.
Physical activity will be measured with activity monitors. The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 13, 26, 52, and 78.
Sedentary behavior will be measured with activity monitors. The 78 week time point was added via a protocol amendment after study start. This is not a primary outcome, but rather a 6-month post-primary outcome follow-up measure.
University of Colorado, Denver
Other
Comparison of Weight Loss Induced by Intermittent Fasting Versus Daily Caloric Restriction in Individuals With Obesity: A 1-Year Randomized Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05742165
Behavior, Body Weight
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05882045
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00342732
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details