Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03265600

Integrating Mindfulness Into the Patient-Centered Medical Home (Phase 2)

Among primary care patients, compare the effectiveness of an 8-week mindfulness-based intervention (Mindfulness Training for Primary Care[MTPC]) vs. a low-dose mindfulness introduction comparator on self-management of chronic illness and illness-related health behavior action plan initiation, as well as on measures related to anxiety, depression, and stress.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cambridge Health Alliance

Somerville, Massachusetts, 02143, United States

About this study

This study builds on a pilot study that investigated the impact of Mindfulness Training for Primary Care on anxiety, depression, stress, and chronic illness self-management in primary care patients receiving care in an urban, community, multi-cultural safety net healthcare system. The current comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial takes place in a larger sample, and investigates the impact of a refined MTPC curriculum on specific aspects of self-regulation such as action plan initiation, while examining potential mechanisms of change, including self-efficacy, perceived control, mindfulness, self-compassion, emotion regulation, and body awareness. Participants randomized to MTPC are compared with participants who are randomized to a low-dose comparator condition and receive a 1-hour introduction to mindfulness with a referral to community mindfulness resources. Outcome assessments are conducted at baseline and study weeks 8-10.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Current CHA patient with an enrolled CHA primary care doctor.
  • CHA patients 18 years of age and older.
  • Able to tolerate and participate in interviews and engage in all procedures.
  • Able to give written consent in English OR willing and able to provide consent and complete assessments through a professional language translator when necessary.
  • Diagnosis eligible to be covered by insurance for group visits (e.g., anxiety disorder, depression, or adjustment disorder related to chronic illness, pain, etc.).

Exclusion criteria

  • Any cognitive impairment that precludes informed consent.
  • Patients who, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, pose an imminent risk of suicide or danger to self or others.
  • Likelihood of potential incarceration such as a conviction or pending charges that may potentially result in imprisonment.
  • Previous enrollment or randomization of treatment in the present study within the 12 months.
  • Behaviors that may cause disruption to a mindfulness group.
  • Patients with symptoms of psychosis, thought disorder, and/or severe mental illness, including schizophrenia, schizoaffective, bipolar disorder, or a current severe episode of major depressive disorder.
  • Lack of insurance coverage for group psychotherapy may preclude participation in groups.
  • Patients in their third trimester of pregnancy who foresee conflicts that preclude their commitment to completing all activities.
  • Patients with highly unstable medical problems that put them at a high risk of hospitalization.

Treatment and study plan

Mindfulness Training for Primary Care

Behavioral

MTPC is a referral-based, insurance-reimbursable 8-week program that can be delivered as group psychotherapy by Patient-Centered Medical Home-integrated behavioral clinicians or as an 8-week primary care group visit delivered by a primary care provider. MTPC groups are 2 hours long for 8 weeks with a 7-hour weekend day of silent practice. MTPC emphasizes mindfulness-oriented skills for self-regulation, self-management of chronic illness, and health behavior change. All participants complete an action planning protocol during Week 7.

60-minute Introduction to Mindfulness

Behavioral

Participants in the low-dose comparator arm receive a 60-minute introduction to mindfulness. Participants are introduced to the definition(s) of mindfulness, brief mindfulness practices, discussion, and an orientation to an 8-week mindfulness group. They are also given a list of leading community, online, print, and smartphone mindfulness resources.

Primary outcomes

  1. Action Plan Initiation Survey (APIS-5)

    Time frame: Weeks 8-10

    The Action Plan Initiation Survey (APIS-5) is a 5-item self-report questionnaire adapted from a measure used by Guck et al. Participants are asked to indicate how successful they were in meeting a previously set Action Plan by using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (Not met at all) to 7 (Totally met), with a score of 5 or above indicating successful initiation of the goal. For each unmet goal, patients are asked to further rate the cause of not meeting the goal by using a 7-point Likert rating scale from 1 (Extremely controllable) to 7 (Not at all controllable).

    For this outcome we reported the number of participants in each arm who successfully initiated an Action Plan, as indicated by a score of 5 or above in reporting whether they were able to meet their action plan goal.

  2. Perceived Stress Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (10 items) measures the degree to which situations in life are stressful. Items are designed to evaluate how overloaded, unpredictable, and uncontrollable one finds one's life. Each item is scored on a 5 point Likert scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often). Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores reflecting worse results (more stress).

  3. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Anxiety Short Form (PROMIS-ASF)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Anxiety Short Form 8a (PROMIS-ASF) is an 8-item scale used to assess patient-reported health status for anxiety. PROMIS instruments are funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and used to reliably and validly measure patient-reported outcomes for clinical research and practice. Participants are asked to rate their experience of the item in the past seven days on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The values of the response to each question are summed into a raw score ranging from 8-40. The raw score is then rescaled with use of the PROMIS Assessment Center Scoring Service into a T score, a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher T-Score reflects worse results (greater symptom severity).

  4. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression Short Form (PROMIS-DSF)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression Short Form 8a (PROMIS-DSF) is an 8-item scale used to assess patient-reported health status for depression. PROMIS instruments are funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and used to reliably and validly measure patient-reported outcomes for clinical research and practice. Participants are asked to rate their experience of the item in the past seven days on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The values of the response to each question are summed into a raw score ranging from 8-40. The raw score is then rescaled with use of the PROMIS Assessment Center Scoring Service into a T score, a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher T-Score reflects reflect worse results (greater symptom severity).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is a 39-item scale that examines five factors that represent aspects of the current empirical conception of mindfulness. These five facets include: "observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience." Participants rate their degree of agreement with each of the items on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Never or very rarely true) to 5 (Very often or always true). Facet scores range from 8-40, with the exception of the nonreactivity facet, which ranges from 7-35. Total scores range from 39-195, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of mindfulness (a better outcome).

  2. Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The short-form Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-SF) is an abbreviated 12-item form of the original 26-item Self-Compassion Scale. The scale is scored on a 5 point Likert scale (1 = Almost never; 5 = Almost always), and negative subscale items are reverse scored, with higher scores indicating greater levels of self-compassion.

  3. Change in Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SECD-6)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale (SECD-6) is a 6-item scale that is used to evaluate a participant's ability to self-manage care for a chronic disease. SECD-6 asks participants to rate their confidence in their own ability to do certain activities, on a scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). Higher scores indicate better results (higher levels of self-efficacy).

  4. Perceived Control Questionnaire (PCQ)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The Perceived Control Questionnaire (PCQ) is adapted from a 5-item perceived control measure from Jerant et al. and a previously validated survey from Armitage et al. This 5-item scale asks participants to rate their sense of control over chronic illness self-management on a 7-point scale from 1 (None) to 7 (Total). Scores range from 5-35, with higher scores indicating better results (greater sense of control).

  5. Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation (DERS) Scale is a 36-item self-report scale designed to assess emotional dysregulation. Participants are asked to rate how often they have emotional dysregulation on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (almost never [0-10%]) to 5 (almost always [91-100%]). The scale assess 6 aspects of emotional dysregulation: non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal directed behavior, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness (reverse-scored), limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity. Total scores range from 5-180, with higher scores indicating worse results (more difficulty in emotional regulation).

  6. Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (pre to post Intervention)

    The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) is a 32-item self-report scale designed to assess 8 aspects of interoceptive awareness : noticing, not-distracting, not-worrying, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, body listening, and trusting. Participants are asked to rate their awareness of interoceptive experiences on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (Never) to 5 (Always). Each subscale has 3-7 items, and scores are obtained by reverse coding items 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and then taking the average of items in each scale. Scores range from 0-5, with higher scores indicating better results (greater interoception).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cambridge Health Alliance

Other

Collaborators

  • Brown University
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • The Arnold P. Gold Foundation
  • The Arthur Vining Davis Foundations

Registry information

Official study title

MINDFUL-PC: Integrating Mindfulness Into the Patient-Centered Medical Home - A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Chronic Illness Self-Management and Action Plan Initiation Among Primary Care Patients

Acronym: MINDFUL-PC-2

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2020
First posted
Aug 29, 2017
Registry last updated
Nov 25, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.